• No results found

PDF hosted at the Radboud Repository of the Radboud University Nijmegen

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "PDF hosted at the Radboud Repository of the Radboud University Nijmegen"

Copied!
24
0
0

Bezig met laden.... (Bekijk nu de volledige tekst)

Hele tekst

(1)

PDF hosted at the Radboud Repository of the Radboud University Nijmegen

The following full text is a publisher's version.

For additional information about this publication click this link.

https://hdl.handle.net/2066/230293

Please be advised that this information was generated on 2021-11-24 and may be subject to

change.

(2)

Contents lists available atScienceDirect

Physics Letters B

www.elsevier.com/locate/physletb

Measurement of the jet mass in high transverse momentum Z (bb ) γ production at s = 13 TeV using the ATLAS detector

.The ATLASCollaboration

a rt i c l e i n f o a b s t r a c t

Articlehistory:

Received17July2019

Receivedinrevisedform27November2020 Accepted30November2020

Availableonline3December2020 Editor: M.Doser

The integrated fiducial cross-section and unfolded differential jet mass spectrum of high transverse momentum Zbb decays are measuredin Zγ events inproton–proton collisions at

s=13 TeV.

The data analysed were collected between 2015 and 2016 with the ATLAS detector at the Large Hadron Collider and correspond to an integrated luminosity of 36.1 fb1. Photons are required to have a transverse momentum pT>175 GeV. The Zbb decay is reconstructed using a jet with pT>200 GeV, foundwith the anti-kt R=1.0 jet algorithm,and groomed to removesoftand wide- angleradiationand tomitigatecontributionsfromthe underlyingevent andadditional proton–proton collisions.Twodifferentbutrelatedmeasurementsareperformedusingtwojetgroomingdefinitionsfor reconstructingthe Zbb decay:trimmingandsoftdrop.Thesealgorithmsdifferintheirexperimental and phenomenological implications regarding jet mass reconstruction and theoretical precision. To identifyZ bosons,b-taggedR=0.2 track-jetsmatchedtothegroomedlarge-R calorimeterjetareusedas aproxyfortheb-quarks.Thesignalyieldisdeterminedfromfitsofthedata-drivenbackgroundtemplates tothedifferentjetmassdistributionsforthetwogroomingmethods.Integratedfiducialcross-sections andunfolded jetmassspectraforeachgroomingmethodare comparedwithleading-ordertheoretical predictions.TheresultsarefoundtobeingoodagreementwithStandardModelexpectationswithinthe currentstatisticalandsystematicuncertainties.

©2020TheAuthor.PublishedbyElsevierB.V.ThisisanopenaccessarticleundertheCCBYlicense (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).FundedbySCOAP3.

Contents

1. Introduction . . . . 2

2. ATLASdetector . . . . 2

3. DataandMonteCarlosimulation . . . . 2

4. Eventreconstructionandselection . . . . 3

5. Signalandbackgroundestimation . . . . 4

6. Definitionoftheobservableandcorrectionfordetectoreffects . . . . 5

7. Systematicuncertainties . . . . 5

8. Results . . . . 7

8.1. Fitresultsandsignificanceestimate . . . . 7

8.2. Integratedfiducialcross-sectionmeasurement . . . . 7

8.3. Differentialfiducialcross-sectionmeasurement . . . . 7

9. Conclusion . . . . 7

Declarationofcompetinginterest . . . . 9

Acknowledgements . . . . 9

References . . . . 9

TheATLASCollaboration . . . . 11

 E-mailaddress:atlas.publications@cern.ch.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physletb.2020.135991

0370-2693/©2020TheAuthor.PublishedbyElsevierB.V.ThisisanopenaccessarticleundertheCCBYlicense(http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).Fundedby SCOAP3.

(3)

1. Introduction

ThisLetter presentsa measurement ofthefiducial anddiffer- ential jet mass cross-sectionsofhightransverse momentum (pT) Z bosonsthatdecayintobb pairs¯ andareproducedinassociation witha photon, denotedby Z(bb¯)γ.The analysisuses proton–

proton(pp)collisiondatacollectedin2015and2016bytheATLAS detector [1] attheLargeHadronCollider(LHC)atacenter-of-mass energyof

s=13 TeV.Thismeasurementoftheunfoldedjetmass spectrum of hadronically decaying Z bosonsat theLHC explores the experimental features and phenomenological implications of techniquesusedtoreconstructboostedbosons –coloursinglets – decayingintobb.¯ Similarmeasurementsofgluons –colouroctets – decayingintobb pairs¯ havealsobeenmadebytheATLAS Collab- oration [2].The Z(→bb¯)γ processprovidesawell-definedexper- imental signature formeasuring massiveboosted Z bosonsusing high-pT jetscontaining pairsofb-quarks.A detailed study ofthe Zbb signal¯ isimportant forassessingsystematicuncertainties andidentification techniquesfor themeasurement of Hbb in¯ the high-pT range, as well asfor potential TeV-scale resonances decaying intodibosons,one ofthem beinga Z boson ora Higgs bosondecayingintobb [3,4].¯

The Z(→bb¯)γ channeloffersadvantagesinaccessingthe Z bb signal¯ compared to the inclusive channels studied in Run 1 by ATLAS [5] and in Run 2 by CMS [6] since it provides both a useful trigger signature via the photon and an opportunity to directly estimate background processes usingthe data. Initial re- sultsofthemodellingofjetkinematicsinthe Z(bb¯)γ channel using 13 TeV data collected by ATLAS are presented in Ref. [7].

The measurement described in this Letter selects bb decays¯ of a Z boson contained within a single jet, referred to as a Z -jet, with transversemomentum pZ -jetT >200 GeV anda photon with transverse momentum pγ

T >175 GeV. The high-pT requirement enhancesthe signal overthe dominant γ +jets backgroundpro- duction, which has a softer pT spectrum. The candidate Z -jet is reconstructed using a ‘groomed’ anti-kt [8] jet with radius pa- rameter R=1.0 (large-R jet). A multivariate algorithm is used to determinewhether R=0.2 track-jetsthat are associatedwith the large-R jet are b-tagged, i.e. ifthey contain b-hadron decay products.TheapproachtotaggingpresentedinthisLetterisbuilt uponafoundationofstudiesfromLHCrunsat

s=7 and8 TeV, includingextensivestudiesofjetreconstructionandgroomingal- gorithms [9–11] and detailed investigations of track-jet-based b- tagginginboostedtopologies [7,12].

Twodifferentjetgroomingalgorithmsareusedtoperformthe measurement: ‘trimming’ [10], and‘soft drop’ [11,13].The exper- imental and phenomenological implications for jet mass recon- structionandtheoreticalprecisionaredifferentforthetwogroom- ingalgorithms. ThetrimmingalgorithmisthedefaultusedinAT- LAS to study boosted bosons, chosen as a result ofoptimisation studiesperformedfromLHCrunsat

s=8 and13 TeV [14].The soft-dropcalculationsachieveadifferenttheoreticalprecisionand offer advantages such as the formal absence of non-global loga- rithms. The distribution ofthe soft-drop massfor QCD processes hasnowbeencalculatedbothatnext-to-leadingorder(NLO)with next-to-leading-logarithm (NLL) accuracy [15,16] and at leading order (LO) with next-to-next-to-leading-logarithm (NNLL) accu- racy [17,18].Thislevel ofprecision forajet substructureobserv- able at a hadron collider is surpassed only by the calculation of thrust ine+e interactions [19].Similar calculationsarenot cur- rentlyavailablefortrimmedjets.

Thedoubledifferentialcross-sectionofsoft-dropjetsasafunc- tionofthemassandtransversemomentumwerepreviouslymea- suredbyATLAS [20] andCMS [21] inbalanceddijeteventsat

s= 13 TeV.The trimmedjetmassdistributionindijetandW/Z +jets eventswas measuredbyCMSat

s=7 TeV [22].Whileprevious

analyses measured thecross-section of quark andgluon-initiated jetsfordifferentgroomingalgorithms,thisanalyses measuresthe massoflarge-R jetscontaining thehadronicdecayproductsof Z bosonsinZ(→bb¯)γ eventsat

s=13 TeV.

2. ATLASdetector

The ATLAS detectorat theLHC is a multipurposeparticle de- tector with a forward–backward symmetric cylindrical geometry and a near 4π coverage in solid angle.1 It consists of an inner detector (ID) for tracking surrounded by a thin superconducting solenoidprovidinga2 Taxialmagneticfield,electromagneticand hadroniccalorimeters,andamuonspectrometer.TheIDcoversthe pseudorapidity range|η|<2.5. It consistsofsilicon pixel,silicon microstrip,andtransitionradiationtrackingdetectors.A newinner pixel layer, the insertable B-layer [23,24], was added at a mean radius of 3.3 cm during the period between Run 1 and Run 2 oftheLHC.Lead/liquid-argon(LAr)samplingcalorimetersprovide electromagnetic(EM)energymeasurements withhighgranularity (|η|<3.2). The hadronic calorimeter uses a steel/scintillator-tile samplingdetectorin the centralpseudorapidity range (|η|<1.7) anda copper/LArdetector inthe region 1.5<|η|<3.2. The for- ward regions (3.2<|η|<4.9) are instrumented withcopper/LAr andtungsten/LAr calorimetermodules optimised for electromag- netic and hadronic measurements, respectively. A muon spec- trometer with an air-core toroid magnet system surrounds the calorimeters.Threelayersofhigh-precisiontrackingchamberspro- videcoverageintherange|η|<2.7,whilededicatedfastchambers allow triggering in the region |η|<2.4. The ATLAS trigger sys- temconsistsofahardware-based first-leveltriggerfollowedby a software-basedhigh-leveltrigger [25].

3. DataandMonteCarlosimulation

Thedatawere collectedin pp collisionsattheLHCwith s= 13 TeV and a 25 nsproton bunch crossing interval during 2015 and2016. The full data sample corresponds to an integratedlu- minosityof 36.1 fb1 afterrequiringthat alldetectorsubsystems were operational during data recording. The uncertainty in the combined2015–2016integratedluminosity is2.1% [26], obtained usingtheLUCID-2 detector[27] for theprimary luminosity mea- surements.Collisioneventswererecordedwithatriggerselecting eventswithatleastone photoncandidatewithtransverseenergy ET>140 GeV.

MonteCarlo(MC) eventsamplesthat includeanATLAS detec- torsimulation [28] based on Geant 4 [29] areusedtomodelthe Zγ signal and the small tt¯+γ and Wγ background contribu- tions.Inaddition, γ+jets MCeventsamplesareusedtostudythe triggermodelling. Inadditionto thehard scatter,each eventwas overlaid with additional pp collisions (pile-up) according to the distribution ofthe average number of pp interactions per bunch crossing,μ,observedindata.Theseadditionalpp collisionswere generatedwith Pythia 8.1 [30] using theATLAS A2set of tuned parameters [31] andtheNNPDF23LO [32] partondistributionfunc- tion(PDF)set.Simulatedeventswerethenreconstructedwiththe samealgorithmsasthoserunoncollisiondata.

1 ATLASusesaright-handedcoordinatesystemwithitsoriginat thenominal interactionpointinthecentreofthedetector.Thepositivex-axisisdefinedbythe directionfromtheinteractionpointtothecentreoftheLHCring,withthepositive y-axispointingupwards,whilethebeamdirectiondefinesthez-axis.Cylindrical coordinates(r,φ)areusedinthetransverse plane,φ beingtheazimuthal angle aroundthez-axis.Thepseudorapidityηisdefinedintermsofthepolarangleθ byη= −ln tan(θ/2).Rapidityisdefinedasy=0.5ln[(E+pz)/(Epz)]whereE denotestheenergyand pzisthecomponentofthemomentumalongthebeam direction.TheangulardistanceR isdefinedas

(y)2+ (φ)2.

(4)

The Zγ signal was modelled using the LO Sherpa 2.1.1 [33]

generator, withthe CT10NLO [34] PDFset;thesample isflavour inclusive ( Z(→qq)γ). An alternative Zγ sample was produced with MadGraph 5.2 [35],whichgeneratedLOmatrixelementsthat werethenpartonshoweredwith Pythia 8.1usingtheNNPDF23LO PDF set andtheATLAS A14 setof tuned parameters [36] forthe underlying event.This alternativesignal sample is usedto deter- mine the systematicuncertaintyassociated withthe signal mod- elling.

The γ+jets sampleswerealsogeneratedwith Sherpa 2.1.1and theCT10NLOPDFset.Thematrixelementwasconfiguredtoallow aphotonwithuptothreepartonsinthefinalstate.Thett¯+γ pro- cesses were modelled by MadGraph 5.2 interfacedto Pythia 8.1.

NLO corrections were applied to the tt¯+γ cross-section [37].

The Wγ MCsampleswithhadronicallydecaying W bosonswere generated using Sherpa 2.1.1,witha configurationsimilar tothat usedforthe Zγ sample.PredictionsforWγ productionwerenor- malisedaccordingtothecross-sectionsprovidedbythegenerator.

4. Eventreconstructionandselection

Eventsarerequiredtohaveareconstructedprimaryvertex,de- fined as the vertex with at least two reconstructed tracks with pT>0.4 GeV andwiththehighestsumofsquaredtransversemo- mentaofassociatedtracks [38].

Hadronicallydecayinghigh-pT Zbb candidates¯ areidentified usinglarge-R jetstocapturebothb-quarks,sincetheywillbevery closeduetothehighLorentzboost.Thetwo differentjetgroom- ingalgorithmsconsideredintheanalysis,trimming andsoftdrop, differintheirpile-upmitigationandmassresolutionperformance.

Trimmed calorimeter jets Trimmed calorimeter jets are recon- structed from noise-suppressedtopological clusters(topoclusters) of calorimeter energy deposits calibrated to the local hadronic scale (LC) [39], using the anti-kt algorithm with radius parame- ter R=1.0 implemented in FastJet [40,41].Trimmedcalorimeter jetsarethosejetstowhichthetrimmingalgorithm [10] isapplied.

The aim of this algorithm is to improve the jet mass resolu- tion and its stability with respect to pile-up by discarding the softer components of jets that originate from initial-state radia- tion,pile-upinteractions,ortheunderlyingevent.Thisisdoneby reclusteringtheconstituentsoftheinitiallarge-R jet,usingthekt algorithm [42,43], into subjets with radius parameter Rsub=0.2 andremoving anysubjetthat hasa pT lessthan5% ( fcut) ofthe parentjet pT.Thejetmassmjet,themainobservableinthisanal- ysis, is definedas themagnitude ofthe four-momentum sumof constituentsinsideajet.Itisreferred toasthecalorimeter-based mass ifit is calculated using the topoclustersasconstituents, or as the track-assisted jet mass [44] if it is estimated by using tracking information.Thejet massfortrimmed jetsisdefinedas theweighted combinationofthecalorimeter-based massandthe track-assistedjetmass [44],whereeachinputmassisweightedby afactorproportionaltotheirinverse-squaredmassresolution.

Soft-drop calorimeter jets Soft-drop calorimeter jets are formed by the applicationof the soft-drop algorithm [11] to the anti-kt R=1.0 jets described above, with additional topological cluster preprocessing that isdescribed below.The soft-drop algorithm is designed to remove soft andwide-angle radiation and also con- tamination from pile-up. In the first step of the grooming algo- rithm,theanti-kt R=1.0 jetsarereclusteredwiththeCambridge–

Aachen (C/A) [45,46] algorithm sothat theconstituents arecom- bined purely accordingto their angularseparation. Thesoft-drop algorithm then reverses the C/A algorithm clustering historyand removes thesofter subjetata specific step of theC/A clustering historyunlessthesoft-dropconditionisfulfilled:

min(pT1,pT2) pT1+pT2

>zcut

R12 R0

β ,

where zcut andβ are algorithm parameters, pT1 and pT2 arethe transversemomentaofthedeclusteredsubjetsateachhistorystep,

R12 isthedistancebetweenthesubjetsinthe(η,φ) spaceand R0 isathresholdcorresponding tothejetradius.The parameters β=0 and zcut=0.1 areusedin theanalysis,based onthestud- iesinRef. [47]. Thefinal measurementis performedforjetmass mjet>30 GeV,whichimpliesthatanycollineardivergenceisreg- ulated andthe measurement remains protected against collinear singularities.Thesoft-dropjetmassexhibitsapile-updependence withthechosenparametersandthereforeaspecialversionofpile- up suppressed topological clustersare used to construct the jets that are then groomed withthe soft-drop algorithm. Specifically, theSoftKiller(SK)algorithm [48] isusedinconjunctionwithCon- stituent Subtraction (CS) [49,50] based on the studies presented inRef. [47]. CS is applied before the SK algorithm.The CS is an extension of the pile-up subtraction based on jet area [51]. The algorithmproceedsasfollows.First,virtualparticleswithinfinites- imally small pT (ghosts) are addedto theevent(eachcovering a fixed area in the ηφ plane) with energy density matching the medianenergydensityoftheevent.Second,theaddedghostsare matchedto the topologicalclustersin ηφ spaceand onlythose withinR=0.25 ofthetopoclusterarefurtherconsideredforthe pile-upremovalprocedure.Thealgorithmproceedstheniteratively througheach topocluster–ghost pairinorder ofascending R.If thepT ofthetopoclusterislargerthanthatofthematchedghost, thepT oftheindividualtopoclusteriscorrectedbysubtractingthe pT of theghost andtheghost are removed. Otherwisethe pT of the topocluster is subtracted from the pT of the ghost and the pT ofthetopoclusterissettozero.TheSKalgorithmexploitsthe characteristicthat particlesoriginatingfrompile-upcollisions are softerthan those from thehard-scattering collision andremoves particlesthatfallbelowacertain pT threshold,determinedonan event-by-event basis. The pile-up suppressed topological clusters afterCSandSKareusedasinputtothesoft-drop jetreconstruc- tion.Thecalorimeter-basedjetmassisusedforsoft-dropjets.

Allgroomedjets A dedicatedMC-based calibration,similar tothe procedure used inRef. [44], is applied to correctthe jet pT and massofboth thetrimmedjetsandthesoft-drop jetsto thepar- ticle level. To account for semileptonic decays of the b-hadrons, thefour-momentumofthe closestreconstructed muoncandidate withinR=0.2 oftheb-taggedtrack-jetistakenintoaccountin thecalorimeter-based componentofthejet massobservable (see belowforthedescriptionofthetrack-jetdefinitionandb-tagging).

MuoncandidatesareidentifiedbymatchingIDtrackstofulltracks ortracksegmentsreconstructedinthemuonspectrometer.Muons are required to have pT>10 GeV and |η|<2.4, and to satisfy theloose identification criteriaofRef. [52], whichimpose quality requirements on the tracks,but no isolation criteria are applied.

A calibration is applied to correct the muon transverse momen- tum,andreconstruction andidentificationefficiencyscalefactors, derivedfrom Jμ+μ and Zμ+μ events [52], areap- pliedtosimulation.Large-R jetsarerequiredtohavepT>200 GeV and|η|<2.0.A comparisonofthecalibrated Z -jet massdistribu- tion andthe particle-leveljet mass distribution fortrimmedjets andsoft-dropjetsisshowninFig.1.Particle-leveljets,usedinthe unfoldingprocedure described in Section 6,are builtfrom stable final-stateparticles (definedasthose withproper lifetime τ cor- respondingto cτ >10 mm) excluding muonsand neutrinos and using the same jet reconstruction algorithms used for calorime- terjets. Similarly to themuon-in-jet correction at reconstruction leveldescribedinSection4,particle-levelmuonsareaddedtothe particle-leveljet if they are within R=0.2 ofa b-hadron. The

Referenties

GERELATEERDE DOCUMENTEN

58 (a) Department of Modern Physics and State Key Laboratory of Particle Detection and Electronics, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, China; (b) Institute

Department of Modern Physics and State Key Laboratory of Particle Detection and Electronics, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei; (b) Institute of Frontier

Department of Modern Physics and State Key Laboratory of Particle Detection and Electronics (a) , University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei; Institute of Frontier

Department of Modern Physics and State Key Laboratory of Particle Detection and Electronics, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei (b) , Institute of Frontier

58 (a) Department of Modern Physics and State Key Laboratory of Particle Detection and Electronics, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, China; (b) Institute

Department of Modern Physics and State Key Laboratory of Particle Detection and Electronics, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei; (b) Institute of Frontier

60a Department of Modern Physics and State Key Laboratory of Particle Detection and Electronics, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei;. 60b Institute of Frontier

60 (a) Department of Modern Physics and State Key Laboratory of Particle Detection and Electronics, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei; (b) Institute of Frontier