• No results found

University of Groningen Partner and family relations in the context of European integration and intra-EU mobility De Winter, Tom

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "University of Groningen Partner and family relations in the context of European integration and intra-EU mobility De Winter, Tom"

Copied!
2
0
0

Bezig met laden.... (Bekijk nu de volledige tekst)

Hele tekst

(1)

University of Groningen

Partner and family relations in the context of European integration and intra-EU mobility De Winter, Tom

DOI:

10.33612/diss.167715339

IMPORTANT NOTE: You are advised to consult the publisher's version (publisher's PDF) if you wish to cite from it. Please check the document version below.

Document Version

Publisher's PDF, also known as Version of record

Publication date: 2021

Link to publication in University of Groningen/UMCG research database

Citation for published version (APA):

De Winter, T. (2021). Partner and family relations in the context of European integration and intra-EU mobility. University of Groningen. https://doi.org/10.33612/diss.167715339

Copyright

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download or to forward/distribute the text or part of it without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license (like Creative Commons).

Take-down policy

If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact us providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim.

Downloaded from the University of Groningen/UMCG research database (Pure): http://www.rug.nl/research/portal. For technical reasons the number of authors shown on this cover page is limited to 10 maximum.

(2)

P

ARTNER AND FAMILY RELATIONS IN THE CONTEXT OF

E

UROPEAN INTEGRATION AND INTRA

-EU

MOBILITY

BY

TOM DE WINTER

-

P

ROPOSITIONS ACCOMPANYING THE DISSERTATION

-

1. Intra-EU mobility, which is fundamental to the European integration project, affects partner choice of Europeans through direct mobility experiences in adolescence and early adulthood. (Chapter 2)

2. The domains in which intra-EU mobility is actively encouraged – work and education – are also important meeting contexts for European binational couples. These contexts as such do not differ strongly from the formation contexts of uninational couples (Chapter 3)

3. Among most European binational couples only one of the partners was ‘mobile’ at the moment of first meeting. This also implies a link between immobility and European integration, which may give new directions to future research (Chapter 3) 4. Among female university students, being in a romantic relationship results in

significant lower aspirations to study abroad. (Chapter 4)

5. The scientific study of studying abroad decisions among higher education students in Europe should be more sensitive to the family/partner context of these students, given that study abroad aspirations seem to ‘compete’ with other domains of life. (Chapter 4)

6. In an intra-EU mobility context transnational care exchange is more feasible than for migrants from non-EU countries, although geographical distance remains an impeding factor. (Chapter 5)

7. Several theories and frameworks that are used to explain family and partner relations in an intra-EU mobility context would benefit from a life course approach. This would make a broad range of context factors more explicit and thereby more visible in the scientific literature.

Referenties

GERELATEERDE DOCUMENTEN

“the main opportunity for chronic care programs to realize short-term medical cost savings is via reductions in costly and avoidable hospital admissions” and “a focus on avoiding

Table 5-4: Multinomial regression parameters - dependent variable: Face-to-Face contact frequency with mother; reference category: once a week or less

In the first chapter, I will look at the effect of intra-EU mobility on partner choice, more specifically I will examine whether student mobility, such as an Erasmus stay

Short term mobility as a child seems to have only a small effect, insofar that natives who have visited many countries as a child, although mainly within Europe, have a

As we will study European binational couples in three countries, Belgium, the Netherlands and Spain, it is important to be aware of the migration and mobility context in

It seems that it is a selection of male students with very high intrinsic motivation (and with highly educated mothers) who are particularly likely to aspire to participate

For the odds of ‘never’ compared to ‘once a week or less’ we find a significant effect of migrant origin: migrants from other (non- neighboring) EU-countries or from non-EU

Meeting opportunities are stated to be a crucial aspect in partner choice, and could also easily be linked to the ‘time and place’ principle of the life course paradigm: the European