• No results found

(The average numers of points obtained were respectively.) The best results obtained where 47 and 45 points, showing that the exam, while certainly long, was definitely doable

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "(The average numers of points obtained were respectively.) The best results obtained where 47 and 45 points, showing that the exam, while certainly long, was definitely doable"

Copied!
1
0
0

Bezig met laden.... (Bekijk nu de volledige tekst)

Hele tekst

(1)

Here are the results of the exam.

There were 50 points to be had, distributed on the four problems as follows: 6, 18, 18, 8. (The average numers of points obtained were 2.4, 12, 12.2, 3.9, respectively.)

The best results obtained where 47 and 45 points, showing that the exam, while certainly long, was definitely doable. (The next best results were 41.5 and 40.5 points.) Despite this, I graded the exam as if the total number of obtainable points had been 45, one reason being that problem 1 was done quite badly. Thus the mark of the exam would be obtained as POINTS / 45 * 10 (rounded to the next half integer excluding 5.5). However, I computed the final mark from the unrounded result of the exam and the unrounded average mark for the homework, weighted according to 60 / 40. (Mastermath forbids weighing the homework with more than 40%).

I hope everyone can find him/her-self in the table below. If not, contact me by e-mail.

Likewise, those who have not passed should contact my by e-mail to make arrangements for an oral retake exam. The date can be fixed according to your convenience. (The date next week provided by Mastermath is irrelevant since the retake will not be a written exam.)

Stud.Nr. Pts Exam Homew. Final

1024469 41.5 9.22 9.9 10

1052659 19 4.22 6.1 5

1158279 24.5 5.44 6.7 6

1620541 13.5 3 4.2 3

2501551 40.5 9 9.7 9

3756351 38 8.44 9.7 9

3864502 47 10.44 (!) 10 10

3888169 39 8.67 8.5 9

3968219 45 10 9.6 10

4015053 33 7.33 8.8 8

4035844 33.5 7.44 7.6 8

4062175 24.5 5.44 9.1 7

4117069 39 8.67 9.4 9

4121082 33 7.33 9.63 8

4125495 33 7.33 9.3 8

4130197 38 8.44 9.8 9

4148452 21.5 4.78 8.9 6

4161831 27 6 9.4 7

4224027 28 6.22 8.9 7

5942705 20.5 4.56 5.9 5

10002860 27 6 8.1 7

10084630 17 3.78 8.1 6

10217037 27 6 8.8 7

10251057 31 6.89 9.3 8

10282831 31.5 7 9.9 8

10294406 22 4.89 7 6

1

Referenties

GERELATEERDE DOCUMENTEN

In this section, we discuss a geometric approach to determine the group of rational points on an elliptic curve E defined over Q(t).. The elliptic surface E associated to E is a

“CatalogEntry” and the physical book class a “BookOnShelf.” For each copy of a book on shelf the library keeps a copyNumber and the date on which that copy was acquired by

The divergence theorem and Stokes’s theorem allow to express flux integrals of these vector fields across certain surfaces as triple or line integrals.. Choose S or S 3 for each of

When doing this, state what information is needed for this, how to get it (e.g., with what kind of sensor), and what approach / technique / algorithm / etc. one might use for this.

(Note: For the requirement, it is sufficient to write down the respective terms specified by Azuma. An explanation is not required. For the discussion, no lengthy description

INTRODUCTION TO MEASURE THEORY & INTEGRATION JULY 12, 2018, 14:00-17:00.. • There are 6 questions, worth

Method 2: Skolem’s method or Chabauty’s method Provided that J (Z) is of free rank strictly smaller than the dimension of J , this method uses p-adic analytic methods to provide a

Now that we have found both a lower and an upper bound for the maximum possible number of ordinary double points on surfaces of a given degree, we will turn to the specific