• No results found

Turning the tide: experimental estuaries

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Share "Turning the tide: experimental estuaries "

Copied!
1
0
0

Bezig met laden.... (Bekijk nu de volledige tekst)

Hele tekst

(1)

Background

Laboratory experiments of tidal systems have been rather unsuccessful the past century. Recently, Kleinhans et al. (2012) discovered that a periodically tilting flume generates dynamic tidal morphology, which opens up experimental investigation to complement numerical modelling.

References

Kleinhans, M.G., van der Vegt, M., Terwisscha van Scheltinga, R., Baar, A.W. and Markies, H., 2012. Turning the tide: experimental creation of tidal channel networks and ebb deltas. Netherlands Journal of Geosciences, 91(3), pp. 311‐323.

Acknowledgements

Chris Roosendaal, Henk Markies and Marcel van Maarseveen – technical support

Turning the tide: experimental estuaries

Jasper R.F.W. Leuven

1

, M.G. Kleinhans

2p

, L. Braat and M. van der Vegt

1leuven.jasper@gmail.com; 2m.g.kleinhans@uu.nl, www.geo.uu.nl/fg/mkleinhans; pPresenting author.

Objective

The main question is: what is the effect of upstream river discharge on the small‐scale dynamics and large‐scale equilibrium dimensions of estuaries?

We hypothesise that fluvial inflow (1) enhances dynamic shifting of ebb and flood tidal channels, and (2) increases the width, length and tidal prism of estuaries depending on the fluvial discharge relative to the tidal amplitude.

Conclusions

• River inflow increases the dimensions of the upper estuary (Fig. 4abc) and  probably causes wider and longer estuaries (Fig. 4d).

• River inflow enhances small‐scale dynamics, particularly migration and shifting  of channels and reversals in ebb and flood dominance of channels (Fig. 3bcd).

• Without river inflow a tidal system evolves into a short tidal basin (Fig. 3ae).

Jasper Leuven

Fig. 1: Top view of experiment. Locations of cross‐sectional profiles used in this study are indicated.

Image is taken from experiment 26 after 150 tidal cycles.

Fig. 3: (a,e) Time series of images taken from 2 m above the flume. (b,c,d) Time stack of upstream cross‐section (see Fig. 1). From the images, the B‐band (yellowness – 0‐256) of LAB colour space is used as a proxy for relative channel depth. The colour value of the sediment bed is higher than 153 and thus not shown. Maximum channel depth is used

as upper range of the colour scale. Location given in amount of pixels (width of one pixel is 0.51 mm). T corresponds to the duration of one tidal cycle. The red line indicates the location of the maximum channel depth. The green line indicates when the river closed off by infill of sediment at the upstream boundary.

Experimental setup

Fig. 2: (left) Schematic drawing showing the principle (Kleinhans et al., 2012). Yellow arrows indicate sediment transport, blue arrows pumping direction and brown arrows tilting direction. (right) Photograph showing the experimental setup.

Fig. 4: (a) Time series of channel width at upstream cross‐section; (b) Enlargement of the box shown in panel (a), showing the initial evolution of channel width; (c) Comparison of the evolution of inlet width and upstream channel width in experiments 26 and 32; (d) Time evolution of total estuary surface area in the experiments. In all panels T corresponds to the duration of one tidal cycle.

YouTube Movie of Exp. 26

Exp. Q (ml s‐1

26 20

29 9.3 31 9.0 27 6.1

32 0

Q = 0 .

Q = 20 mL s

‐1

.       Q = 9 mL s

‐1

Experiments

Tilting amplitude was set to 3.0 mm, resulting in maximum slopes of 0.0015. A stepping motor controlled constant tilting velocity (40 mm/minute) of flume. At maximum flume slope, the stepping motor paused 2 seconds before tilting direction

changed. The resulting tidal period (T) is 22 seconds. Sea level and sediment bed level were set to a constant value of respectively 0.054 m and 0.055 m above flume floor.

Dunes were represented with an erodible sediment barrier (Fig. 1) of 0.02 m high.

b. c. d.

b.

a. c.

d.

a. e.

Deep 029

Shallow

Referenties

GERELATEERDE DOCUMENTEN

Model results suggest that the observed cyclic behavior is the result of feedbacks among the periodically changing inlet configuration, waves, tidal currents and

• Dependence of length on location  formation mechanism related to tide, since the tidal.. amplitude increases and tidal prism decreases in easterly direction

• In most model runs, the formation of shoals is triggered by a (temporary) decrease in tidal prism and export of sediment. However, in some other model

• Mid-channel bars hardly migrate, cause bank erosion such that channel curvature increases and bars become strongly forced which further enhances bank erosion.. • This leads

Inlet narrows (one channel)  tidal prism decreases  sudden export of sediment forms shoal on ebb-tidal delta  shoal grows seaward  shoal.. migrates to downdrift island as

XMFit model processes this and returns water depth (bathymetry), current direction and magnitude and peak wave direction and period. Thus, the relation between hydrodynamics

sand- and mudflats Fluvial flood plain and marine salt-marsh areas Salt-marsh levees / ridges:. relatively high parts in the

No descriptive taxonomy and forecasting model for perpetually changing and interacting channels and shoals formed by ebb and flood currents in estuaries. • Are bar