• No results found

Form: Report aircraft proximity ILT.052

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Share "Form: Report aircraft proximity ILT.052"

Copied!
4
0
0

Bezig met laden.... (Bekijk nu de volledige tekst)

Hele tekst

(1)

Details notifier

|

n Pilot n ATS-personnel

|

| |

|

|

|

Details aircraft

|

|

|

|

An aircraft proximity (airprox) is an occurrence in which, in the opinion of a pilot or air traffic personnel, the distance between aircraft as well as their relative positions and speed have been such that the safety of the aircraft involved may have been compromised.

Initial report:

An initial report of an airprox initiated by the party concerned should be made immediately by radio, prefixing the message with the word

"Airprox".

Confirmation report:

Initial reports must be confirmed within 72 hours by completing the full "airprox report" or an equivalent incident report form as used by the ATS-unit or the company. Reporting should be done by or on behalf of a pilot or the ATS-personnel concerned.

Purpose of investigation:

To promote the safety of air traffic by recommending where necessary to the appropriate authorities or aircraft operators any action which needs to be taken to avoid similar occurrences. No disciplenary action shall be taken in the event of pilot or controller error because the fundamental objective of the investigation is prevention of an airprox, not to apportion blame or liability, except in case of gross negligence.

The Dutch CAA (occurrence reporting bureau) determines the

‘occurrence class’ of the incident. In case of a serious incident; the report shall be forwarded to the Dutch Investigation board. It is the responsibility of the Dutch Investigation Board to decide if further investigation is necessary.

The trend for the reports which are classified as ‘incident’ will be closely monitored by the Dutch CAA. If necessary; corrective actions shall be taken by the authorities.

Send the form to abl@ilent.nl or send to Inspectie Leefomgeving en Transport / Luchtvaart P.O. Box 16191, 2500 BD Den Haag

Additional information about this form can be obtained via telephone +31 88 489 00 00 or E-mail abl@ilent.nl

Visiting address: Kingsfordweg 1, 1043 GN Amsterdam, the Netherlands

Additional information 088 489 00 00 | www.ilent.nl

1

1.1 Name (incl. initials and prefix) 1.2 Function notifier

1.3 Residence address

1.4 Postcode and place of residence 1.5 Country

1.6 Phonenumber(s) 1.7 E-mailaddress

2

2.1 Aircraft registration 2.2 Aircraft type

2.3 Name of pilot in command 2.4 Operator

Report

Aircraft proximity

ILT.052.08 | 1 of 4

(2)

Details flight

|

|

|

|

|

n IFR n VFR n None

|

n A n B n C n D n E n F n G

|

|

|

n Ft n FL

|

Altimeter setting hPa n Level flight n Climbing n Descending n Turning left n Turning right

|

Rate of climb Ft/min

|

Rate of descend Ft/min

Flight weather conditions at time of airprox

n IMC n VMC

n Cloud n Haze n Fog Feet n Above n Below

|

n feet n meters

n In cloud n In fog n Between cloudlayers

n In snow n In rain n In sleet n In haze n Into the sun n Out of sun

|

n KM n NM

Details airprox

| |

n Yes n No

n AFIS n TWR n APP n ACC n FIC

|

| |

Details other aircraft

n Civil n Military

n High wing n Low wing n Other:

|

|

|

|

|

3

3.1 Radio callsign

3.2 Callsign of groundstation 3.3 Frequency at time of airprox 3.4 Aerodrome of departure 3.5 Aerodrome of first intended

landing and destination, if different

3.6 Type of flight plan 3.7 Position at time of airprox 3.8 Airspace classification 3.9 Heading or route 3.10 True airspeed 3.11 Altitude or FL 3.12 Attitude

3.13 Rate of climb or descend

4

4.1 Meteorological conditions 4.2 Vertical distance from

4.3 Horizontal distance from cloud 4.4 The aircraft was

4.5 The aircraft was flying 4.6 Flight visibility

5

5.1 Date and time of airprox (in UTC) 5.2 Initially reported by radio 5.3 Reported to

5.4 Name of the station 5.5 Date and time of the report

6

6.1 Other aircraft was 6.2 Other aircraft had 6.3 Aircraft registration 6.4 Type of aircraft 6.5 Radio callsign 6.6 Lighting

6.7 Number of engines

Report

Aircraft proximity

Human Environment and Transport Inspectorate Ministry of Infrastructure and Water Management

ILT.052.08 | 2 of 4

(3)

|

n N n NE n E n SE n S n SW n W n NW n Climbing n Level flight n Descending

View from above View from astern Example

Estimated horizontal separation: Estimated vertical separation:

|

n Meters n NM n Meters n Feet

ACAS

n Yes n No n Yes n No

n Traffic advisory n Resolution advisory n Both

n Yes n No

n Yes (state advice) n No (please explain)

|

|

n Yes n No

Transponder

n Yes n No n Yes n No

n Off n Standby n On n ALT / C

|

Form proceeding

n Yes n No 6.8 Aircraft colour

6.9 Other characteristic details or markings

6.10 Movement horizontal 6.11 Movement vertical

6.12 Mark the passage of the other aircraft relative to you in plan on the left and in elevation on the right, assuming you are in the centre of each diagram. Indicate horizontal and vertical distance.

7

7.1 Did you carry ACAS?

7.2 If yes, was ACAS active?

7.3 What did ACAS give?

7.4 Did you take avoiding action?

7.5 Was avoiding action based on ACAS advisory?

7.6 Was ACAS advisory in conflict with ATC instruction?

8

8.1 Did you carry a transponder?

8.2 Was it mode S capable?

8.3 What was the operational status 8.4 Transponder code selected

9

9.1 Do you want this form to be sent to the inspector (via the occurrence bureau)?

Report

Aircraft proximity

Human Environment and Transport Inspectorate Ministry of Infrastructure and Water Management

ILT.052.08 | 3 of 4

(4)

Comments or suggestions

10

10.1 Give comments or suggestions, including your opinion on the probable cause of the airprox.

Please add the following items:

- avoiding action by own and/or other aircraft

- kind of avoiding action - estimated shortest distance to the other aircraft vertically and/

or horizontally.

Report

Aircraft proximity

Human Environment and Transport Inspectorate Ministry of Infrastructure and Water Management

ILT.052.08 | 4 of 4

Referenties

GERELATEERDE DOCUMENTEN

7.. moeten worden herhaald en grote krachten kunnen vragen. Dit soort werk wordt door de mens als eentonig en vermoeiend ervaren. Geen wonder dus dat eeuwenlang

Let i be the index of the smallest element of EXPECTED. This process is repeated until the smallest element of EXPECTED is no longer below five. Elements having

Besides, the decarboxylation of the pyruvate anion by means of 1,3- azolium cations bas been examined with the CND0/2 method, since most enzymic reactions in

Using structuration theory as a lens to understand interorganizational collaboration, our analysis reveals five episode types where (1) changes in interorgani- zational networks

Second, the penetration of the magnetic field through the window opening and its mounting needs to be calculated. Point of special attention have been discussed in the

The potential contributions and advantages of the QPAIS platform are as follows: 1 it allows uniform illumination on a small volume of the target sample, using an easy fiber

The fact that companies scored low with respect to reporting on targets (regarding both operations and supply chain) shows that it is still quite unusual in the private sector to

In the end, and using the example of FCA again, my study proves that for the majority of the stocks of my sample where my regression model applies, the American stock will pose moves