• No results found

List of consulted experts

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "List of consulted experts "

Copied!
2
0
0

Bezig met laden.... (Bekijk nu de volledige tekst)

Hele tekst

(1)

Appendix A - Questionnaire

- 92 - University of Groningen - Faculty of spatial sciences

Appendix

Questionnaire

Introduction

What is the reason for starting this project?

What is the goal of the project?

What is the current state of the project?

Category 1: Form of Private Involvement

1. Which form of private involvement is being applied in this project?

2. Which form of private involvement was originally aimed for?

3. Why has the form of private involvement changed during the course of the project?

Category 2: Chances and Problems

4. Which chances and problems to improve the environmental quality of the project have emerged or disappeared by using this form of private involvement?

5. Which chances and problems could emerge or disappear by applying on earlier or later private involvement?

Category 3: Preconditions

6. What are the preconditions for successful private involvement? Are these preconditions different for early private involvement?

7. What are the preconditions for fitting in the project in the environment spatially, when applying private involvement?

8. What are the preconditions to optimise the environmental quality? How can private parties be stimulated to optimise the environmental quality?

Conclusion

9. What is your vision on the future developments with regard to early private involvement?

A

(2)

Appendix A - Questionnaire

University of Groningen - Faculty of spatial sciences -93-

Appendix

List of consulted experts

Interviews:

- Martijn van Berkel

- Martin van der Does de Bye - Onno Dwars

- Jos Geurts

- Maarten Haverkamp - Frank Hoogenboom - Gijs Jurgens

- Jeroen Maas - Jan Sanner

- William van der Sluis - Bart Spaargaren - Stan Roestenberg - Cees Zijlmans - Mario van de Zwan

Expert group meeting:

- Jos Arts

- Harry van der Burgt - Hans Eenhoorn - Dirk Knook

- Sibout Nooteboom - Ad de Rooy

B

Referenties

GERELATEERDE DOCUMENTEN

In this chapter I focus on the social psychological underpinnings of nature conservation performed by farmers. In a subsequent chapter I will argue that these

Taken together, this dissertation aims to provide the reader with a perspective on the entire process of commitment making: under which conditions people engage in it, if it

Chapter 3 Using Tailored Information and Public Commitment to Improve the Environmental Quality of Farm Lands 29 Method 34 Results 37. General Discussion

In this chapter I focus on the social psychological underpinnings of nature conservation performed by farmers. In a subsequent chapter I will argue that these underpinnings can

More specifically, we hypothesize that: The TPB constructs will significantly predict both the intention to perform non-subsidized nature conservation practices as well as the

More specifi- cally, we hypothesized that this would result in a more positive attitude towards conserva- tion, a stronger desire to engage in conservation, more time spent

Receiving information that is incongruent with general expectations may induce people to choose differently from what they would do based on these general expectations. In gene-

If making a commitment keeps the issue salient and activates cognitive processes such as “cognitive elaboration”, this could account for why commitment leads to long-term attitude