• No results found

Additional file 2

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "Additional file 2"

Copied!
4
0
0

Bezig met laden.... (Bekijk nu de volledige tekst)

Hele tekst

(1)

Additional file 2

S.P. Showa, F. Nyabadza, S.D. Hove-Musekwa, G. Magombedze.

Elasticity Analysis

The system of equations (7)-(14) can be written as

N (t + 1) = A (θ, n(t), B(t), C(t)) N(t) + Bn(t), n(t + 1) = U (θ, N(t), n(t), C(t)) n(t) + S, C(t + 1) = c (θ, n(t), C(t)) ,

B(t + 1) = b (θ, N(t), n(t), B(t)) ,

(1)

where

A (θ, n(t), B(t), C(t)) =

0 0 0 β

1

exp(−h 1+ωC

t1

B

t

)

θ 1 θ 3 0 0

0 θ 2 exp(−hC t ) θ 3 0

0 0 θ 2 φT t 0

 ,

B =

 0 β 2

0 0 0 0 0 0

, N (t) = 

D t P t Q t V t

 ′

, n(t) = 

T t T t

 ′

,

U (θ, N(t), n(t), C(t)) =

H 0

K (1 − µ T

) exp(−h 2 C t )

 ,

where H = ν exp



− β 1 V t

1 + ωC t

− β 2 T t



+ a exp



− T t

K



and K =



1 − exp



− β 1 V t

1 + ωC t

− β 2 T t



exp(−h 2 C t ), c (θ, n(t), C(t)) = f (T t )T t [1 − exp(−h 2 C t )] + (1 − µ C )C t , b (θ, N(t), n(t), B(t)) = g(T t )V t [1 − exp(−h 1 B t )] + (1 − µ B )B t ,

1

(2)

θ = 

h h 1 h 2 µ T

χ ψ



, B(t) = B t , C(t) = C t , and S = 

S T 0

 ′

Taking the differentials of the first equation of (1) we have

dN (t + 1) = (dA)N(t) + A(dN(t)) + Bdn(t) + (dB)n(t), (2) where A (θ, n(t), B(t), C(t)) = A. Multiplying the first entry on the right hand side of equation (2) by a 4 × 4 identity matrix I, respectively, we have

dN (t + 1) = I(dA)N(t) + A(dN(t)) + Bdn(t). (3) Applying the vec operator to (3) we have

dN (t + 1) = (N(t) ⊗ I) dvecA + AdN(t) (4)

+Bdn(t),

= (N(t) ⊗ I)  ∂vecA

∂θ dθ + ∂vecA

∂n(t) dn(t) + ∂vecA

∂C(t) dC(t)



(5) + (N(t) ⊗ I) ∂vecA

∂B(t) dB(t) + AdN(t) + Bdn(t).

Multiplying the right hand side of equation (5) by the identity

we get dN (t + 1) = (N(t) ⊗ I)  ∂vecA

∂θ + ∂vecA

∂n(t) dn(t)

+ ∂vecA

∂C(t) dC(t)

 dθ + (N(t) ⊗ I )  ∂vecA

∂B(t) dB(t)



dθ + A dN (t)

dθ + B dn(t) dθ dθ.

by the First identification theorem which states that if dy = Qdx then dy dx = Q we have, dN (t + 1)

= (N(t) ⊗ I)  ∂vecA

∂θ + ∂vecA

∂N (t) dN (t)

+ ∂vecA

∂n(t) dn(t)

+ ∂vecA

∂C(t) dC(t)



+ (N(t) ⊗ I)  ∂vecA

∂B(t) dB(t)



+ A dN (t)

+ B dn(t) dθ Performing the same operations on the second equation of (1) we have,

dn(t + 1)

= (n(t) ⊗ I )  ∂vecU

∂θ + ∂vecU

∂N (t) dN (t)



+ (n(t) ⊗ I)  ∂vecU

∂n(t) dn(t)

+ ∂vecU

∂C(t) dC(t)



+ U dn(t) dθ . It can easily be shown that

dC(t + 1) dθ = ∂c

∂θ + ∂c

∂n(t) dn(t)

+ ∂c

∂C(t) dC(t)

and

dB(t + 1) dθ = ∂b

∂θ + ∂b

∂N (t) dN (t)

+ ∂b

∂n(t) dn(t)

+ ∂b

∂B(t) dB(t)

.

2

(3)

Given initial conditions, we can recursively compute N(t), B(t), C(t), n(t), dN(t)

, dB(t)

, dC(t)

and dn(t)

. The mature virus population is given by weighted sum of stage densities as V (t) = e 4 N (t),

where e 4 is column vector with a one on the fourth position and zeros everywhere. The sensitivity of the virus population to the vector of parameters is then given by

dV (t)

= e 4 dN (t) dθ .

Proportional changes known as elasticities are used to compare the parameter sensitivities.

The elasticity of the virus population V (t) to the parameter vector θ is given by θ

V (t) dV (t)

.

Negative binomial distribution method to estimate transition prob- abilities

To calculate the proportion that goes to the virus stage and the proportion that remains in the provirus stage, we divide the provirus stage into K identical pseudo stages and let the probability of moving to the next stage in each of the pseudo stages be γ. The time τ required for the provirus to pass through all the K stages is the time required for the K th success in a series of identical Bernoulli trials with probability of success γ. This time has a negative Binomial distribution with mean τ = K γ and variance K (1−γ) γ

2

. The number of pseudo stages and their common transition probabilities are calculated from the mean and variance as;

γ = τ ¯

var(τ ) + ¯ τ , (6)

K = τ ¯ 2

var(τ ) + ¯ τ . (7)

HIV has a life cycle of one to two days [1, 2]. The early steps of HIV replication (from entry of the virus to integration) takes one day [3]. The average duration of the provirus stage is computed as 13.6 hours with a variance of 94.8 hours. With these values and using expressions (6) and (7), γ = 0.1263 and K = 2. Thus one pseudo provirus stage is added to the model and is represented by Q. The transition probability within the pseudo provirus stages and between the provirus stage and the mature virus stage, is then computed as θ 2 = 0.5 and γ = 0.06315. The probability that the provirus will survive and remain in the

3

(4)

same pseudo provirus stage is computed as θ 3 = 0.5(1 − γ) = 0.43685, where 0.5 is the stage specific survival [4].

References

[1] Folks T, Powell DM, Lightfoote MM, Benn S, Martin MA, A.S. Fauci: Induction of HTLV-111/LAV from a non virus producing T cell line, Implications for la- tency. Science 1986, 231:600-602.

[2] Wong D: Human Immunodeficiency Viruses [http://virology- online.com/viruses/HIV.htm].

[3] Butler SC, Mark S, Hansen T, Bushman FD: A quantitative assay for HIV DNA integration in vivo. Nat Med 2001 ,7(Suppl 5):631-634.

[4] Brinchmann JE, Albert J, Vartal F, Few infected CD4 + T cells but a high propor- tion of replication-competent provirus in the asymptomatic human immun- odefiency virus type 1 infection. J Virol 1991, 65(Suppl 4):2019-2023.

4

Referenties

GERELATEERDE DOCUMENTEN

Indicate if the pre-production stage (end of all sales, engineering, process planning and procurement activities before production) of the project was delayed in reflection to

These were victims of violence perpetrated by a partner, victims of several perpetrators, victims who had been exposed to domestic violence for a long time and

Participant 2 Traditional product is small compared to developed products Chose to make different products because of small market Developed products most important.. Participant 3

more prominent were the contacts from the end of the fifth millennium onward, with the in many respects differently organised neolithic communities of the loess

The starting point of this paper was the observation that, while standard game theory is based on the assumption of perfectly rational behavior in a well-de ned model that is

maximum soil moisture in a quadratic function; b: weight plot of the maximum soil moisture in a quadratic function; c: scatter plot of the quadratic model predictions against

This objection, however, makes two unjustified assumptions – firstly, that the future com- prises an actually infinite number of events and, secondly, that God’s knowledge cannot

The present text seems strongly to indicate the territorial restoration of the nation (cf. It will be greatly enlarged and permanently settled. However, we must