• No results found

University of Groningen Standardization in fetal growth restriction Beune, Irene

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "University of Groningen Standardization in fetal growth restriction Beune, Irene"

Copied!
9
0
0

Bezig met laden.... (Bekijk nu de volledige tekst)

Hele tekst

(1)

University of Groningen

Standardization in fetal growth restriction

Beune, Irene

DOI:

10.33612/diss.156487314

IMPORTANT NOTE: You are advised to consult the publisher's version (publisher's PDF) if you wish to cite from it. Please check the document version below.

Document Version

Publisher's PDF, also known as Version of record

Publication date: 2021

Link to publication in University of Groningen/UMCG research database

Citation for published version (APA):

Beune, I. (2021). Standardization in fetal growth restriction: Progression by consensus. University of Groningen. https://doi.org/10.33612/diss.156487314

Copyright

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download or to forward/distribute the text or part of it without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license (like Creative Commons).

Take-down policy

If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact us providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim.

Downloaded from the University of Groningen/UMCG research database (Pure): http://www.rug.nl/research/portal. For technical reasons the number of authors shown on this cover page is limited to 10 maximum.

(2)

Standardization in fetal growth restriction

Progression by consensus

Irene Beune

(3)

Colofon

Standardization in fetal growth restriction Progression by consenses

Cover design: Esther van Lemmen Lay out: Esther van Lemmen Printing: Ridderprint

Copyright© Irene M Beune 2021

All rights resered. No part of this thesis may be reproduced, stored or transmitted in any way or by any means without the prior permission of the author, or when applicable, of the publishers of the scientific papers.

(4)

Standardization in fetal growth restriction

Progression by consensus

Proefschrift

ter verkrijging van de graad van doctor aan de Rijksuniversiteit Groningen

op gezag van de

rector magnificus prof. dr. C. Wijmenga en volgens besluit van het College voor Promoties.

De openbare verdediging zal plaatsvinden op maandag 8 februari 2021 om 14:30 uur

door

Irene Maria Beune geboren op 16 juli 1986

(5)

Promotor Prof. dr. J.J.H.M. Erwich Copromotores Dr. S.J. Gordijn Dr. J.W. Ganzevoort Beoordelingscommissie Prof. dr. K.W.M. Bloemenkamp Prof. dr. A. David

(6)
(7)
(8)

Contents

Chapter 1 Introduction

Part 1: What are the effects of fetal growth restriction?

Chapter 2 Early-onset Fetal Growth Restriction: A Systematic Review on Mortality and Morbidity

Part 2: Why is there a need for standardization in fetal growth restrition studies and medical care?

Chapter 3 Building Consensus and Standards in Fetal Growth Re striction Studies Chapter 4 Temporal variation in definition of fetal growth restriction

in the literature

Part 3: Is there a possibility to come to consensus how to diagnose

fetal growth restriction antenatal, postnatal and after fetal demise? Chapter 5 Consensus Definition of Fetal Growth Restriction:

A Delphi Procedure

Chapter 6 Consensus Definition and Essential Reporting Parame ters of Selective Fetal Growth Restriction in Twin Preg-nancy: A Delphi Procedure

Chapter 7 Consensus Based Definition of Growth Restriction in the Newborn

Chapter 8 Consensus definition of fetal growth restriction (FGR) in intra uterine fetal death (IUFD): a Delphi procedure

(9)

Chapter

Part 4: How to improve the methodology in consensus procedures?

Chapter 9 Testing online panel supports face-to-face meeting results of two Core Outcome Set consensus procedures; An additional on line consultation round

Chapter 10 General discussion and future perspectives Chapter 11 Summary/Nederlandse samenvatting Chapter 12 Appendices

Review committee List of publications Dankwoord Curriculum vitae

Referenties

GERELATEERDE DOCUMENTEN

From an immediate survival perspective, the optimal birth weight on a population level is suggested to be between the 80th and 84th percentiles as IUFD of unknown causes (as- sumed

By consensus FGR is defined as onset before 32 weeks of gestation, a fetal abdominal circum- ference or estimated fetal weight (EFW) below the 3rd centile or absent end-diastolic flow

The issue of sFGR in MC twins versus exclusion of twin–twin transfusion syndrome (TTTS) and the issue of whether to use twin-specific reference charts have been studied.(41)

The combination of Doppler measurements and fetal biometry has higher sensitivity in detecting FGR than do biometric measurements alone.(6–10) Moreover, serum markers for

For early FGR (<32 weeks), three soli- tary parameters (abdominal circumference (AC) <3(rd) centile, estimated fetal weight (EFW) <3(rd) centile and absent end-diastolic

For sFGR in DC twin pregnancy, one solitary parameter (EFW of one twin <3rd centile) and at least two out of three contributory parameters (EFW of one twin <10th centile,

Using the Delphi procedure, we were able to establish a consensus definition for growth restriction of the newborn that is not solely based on birth weight below a certain

The consensus was definition included: antenatal clinical diagnosis of fetal growth restriction OR a birth weight <3rd centile OR at least 5 out of 10 contributory variables