• No results found

Limitations in dual-task performance Pannebakker, M.M.

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "Limitations in dual-task performance Pannebakker, M.M."

Copied!
11
0
0

Bezig met laden.... (Bekijk nu de volledige tekst)

Hele tekst

(1)

Limitations in dual-task performance

Pannebakker, M.M.

Citation

Pannebakker, M. M. (2009, December 3). Limitations in dual-task performance. Retrieved from https://hdl.handle.net/1887/14475

Version: Not Applicable (or Unknown)

License: Licence agreement concerning inclusion of doctoral thesis in the

(2)

Limitations in Dual-Task Performance

Merel M. Pannebakker

(3)

ISBN 978-90-9024840-0

Copyright © 2009, Merel M. Pannebakker

Printed by Print Partners Ipskamp B.V. Amsterdam

All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronically, mechanically, by photocopy, by recording, or otherwise, without prior permission from the author.

(4)

Limitations in Dual-Task Performance

Proefschrift

ter verkrijging van

de graad van Doctor aan de Universiteit Leiden,

op gezag van Rector Magnificus prof. mr. P.F. van der Heijden, volgens besluit van het College voor Promoties

te verdedigen op donderdag 3 december 2009 klokke 13.45 uur

door

Merel Mathilde Pannebakker

geboren te Schiedam in 1977

(5)

Promotiecommissie

Promotor Prof. dr. B. Hommel

Prof. dr. K. R. Ridderinkhof (University of Amsterdam)

Copromotor Dr. G. P. H. Band

Overige leden Prof. dr. I. Koch (Aachen University) Prof. dr. N. O. Schiller

Dr. G. Wolters

(6)

Aan mijn ouders

(7)
(8)

Contents

List of Abbreviations 9

Chapter 1 General Introduction 11

Chapter 2 Process Compatibility: A neglected Contribution to Dual- task Costs

29

Chapter 3 What do Psychological Refractory Period and Attentional Blink have in Common?

63

Chapter 4 How does Mental Rotation affect Spatial Attention in a Psychological Refractory Period Paradigm: Behavioural and Neurophysiological measures

81

Chapter 5 Capacity Limitations of Cognitive Operations 107 Chapter 6 Discussion and Conclusion 131

Chapter 7 References 145

Appendices

Appendix A Summary in Dutch (Samenvatting) 161 Appendix B Acknowledgements (Dankwoord) 169 Appendix C Curriculum Vitae 173

(9)
(10)

List of Abbreviations

AB attentional blink

AEC adaptive executive control ANOVA analysis of variance

CCW counter clockwise

CW clockwise

ECTVA executive control theory of visual attention EEG electro-encephalogram EOG electro-oculogram

ERP event-related potential

fMRI functional magnetic resonance imaging

HEOG horizontal electro-oculogram

IQ intelligence quotient

LRP lateralized readiness potential MEG magneto-encephalogram

MSE mean square error

N2pc negative 2 posterior contralateral

OSPAN operation span

PC percentage correct

R response RSVP rapid serial visual presentation

RT reaction time

PRP psychological refractory period S stimulus

SD standard deviation

SOA stimulus onset asynchrony

SPCN sustained posterior contralateral negativity SPM standard progressive matrices

SEM standard error of the mean T task TEC theory of event coding

TVA theory of visual attention

VEOG vertical electro-oculogram VSTM visual short-term memory

WM working memory

(11)

Referenties

GERELATEERDE DOCUMENTEN

investigate the process overlap in a dual task between mental rotation and visual-spatial attention electrophysiologically to clarify whether attention can be used independent

Although modulation of the match effect by a task switch in itself underlines the importance of functional-capacity limitations in explaining the amount of parallel processing, it

Four tasks were conducted: the AB paradigm to measure the attentional impairment in reporting the second of two targets in terms of AB magnitude; the PRP paradigm to measure

In Brisson and Jolicœur’s (2007a) PRP experiment with an easy versus difficult response selection for T1 and a covert visual-spatial attention shifting task for T2, SPCN onset

Hence, if the main limitation in the rotation task is that the same operation cannot be implemented with different parameters at the same time (hypothesis C; see also HC in

The results (specifically Chapters 2 and 5) show that, in order to accommodate crucial aspects of the findings summarized in the preceding section, any model of dual- task

Executive control processes of working memory predict attentional blink magnitude over and above storage capacity?. Working Memory, Oxford: Oxford

De resultaten laten zien dat alhoewel een aanzienlijk gedeelte van het werkgeheugen inderdaad werd ingenomen door de extra taak, er nog steeds facilitatie was van de respons