• No results found

“When Everybody is Fighting for their Promised Land:” Congressional Lobbying and the Arab-Israeli Conflict

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "“When Everybody is Fighting for their Promised Land:” Congressional Lobbying and the Arab-Israeli Conflict"

Copied!
3
0
0

Bezig met laden.... (Bekijk nu de volledige tekst)

Hele tekst

(1)

Name: Sytse Buruma Student number: 1391747

Course title: Master Dissertation American Studies Supervisor: Prof. Dr. W.M. Verhoeven

Year: 4 (Master) Academic year: 2007-2008

Course code: LAX999M20 Credits: 20

Word count: 16.413 Date: December 16, 2007

(2)

ABSTRACT

This dissertation seeks to analyze the strained relations between America and the Middle East. It has been written upon the assumption that the current situation is essentially a political conflict, as Washington’s Middle East policy is a major source of the current chaos. America’s position in the Arab-Israeli conflict effectively illustrates this, seeing that it contributed to the strained power relations in the region, increased anti-Americanism throughout the Arab world, and served as a breeding ground for terrorism. In scrutinizing this unfortunate policy, it is my opinion that an understanding of Washington’s foreign policy requires an appreciation of the domestic factors that shape it. In this case, especially the role of Congress is crucial, since Capitol Hill is the main architect of America’s pro-Israel policy. However, academic literature concerning America’s position in the Arab-Israeli conflict has often overlooked the influence of Congress, and the factors that shape the Hill’s Middle East policy. This remains a shortcoming, because many explanations for America’s actions can be disclosed by scrutinizing these aspects. Indeed, I will argue that Congress plays a vital role in establishing America’s foreign policy, and is heavily influenced by interest groups in formulating its course of action. Applying this to America’s position in the Arab-Israeli conflict, I will further contend that the American Jewish lobby has become extremely influential on the Hill, and this alliance between Congress and the pro-Israel lobby blocks every attempt to a more neutral and balanced approach toward the conflict. Arab-Americans, on the other hand, have been unable to effectively present their perspective on Capitol Hill. This is slowly changing, though, and the Arab-American lobby is on the rise, but cannot be expected to equal its Jewish counterpart in the foreseeable future. Consequently, the iron grip of American Jews on the Hill, combined with the inability of Arab-Americans to form a

(3)

CONTENTS

Introduction 1

Chapter I: Congress and Foreign Policy 10

Chapter II: Interest Groups 16

Chapter III: The Jewish Lobby 20

Chapter IV: The Arab-American Lobby 33

Conclusion 47

Referenties

GERELATEERDE DOCUMENTEN

Among those who want full integration or assimilation into American society, especial- ly middle-class Arab Americans, many em- phasize the strong cultural link between Arabs

Tot de weinig betrokkenen behoren relatief veel vrouwen (62%). Het inkomensniveau en de opleiding zijn lager dan gemiddeld. Men heeft minder kennis van de natuur dan gemiddeld,

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download or to forward/distribute the text or part of it without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright

Light inside this wavelength range can be effectively absorbed by both trans and cis azobenzenes, but the absorbance by trans is still large enough to trigger the dynamic

Moreover, when construction workers have to deal with problems that are exceeding the subcontractor they work for (i.e. they have to communicate with construction

The issue between Israel and Palestine is purely a political issue.” When asked why Christians from various commu- nities in Nigeria view it as a religious issue,

Adhesion force measurements were performed with Si–Glass, SiO 2 –Glass, Al 2 O 3 –Glass and the ZrO 2 –ZrO 2 combinations both in ambient and vacuum. A typical force–displace

In the majority of the participants, the meningococcal vaccine clearly induced naïve responses to MenW and MenY as compared to a booster response to MenC.. At this one year time