• No results found

framework of the Inter-Sectoral Impact Model Intercomparison Project (ISI-MIP; http://www.isi-mip.org/).

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Share "framework of the Inter-Sectoral Impact Model Intercomparison Project (ISI-MIP; http://www.isi-mip.org/)."

Copied!
1
0
0

Bezig met laden.... (Bekijk nu de volledige tekst)

Hele tekst

(1)

We employed a set of seven global hydrological models (GHMs) to quantify the impact of climate change on regional irrigation water demand, and the resulting uncertainties arising from newly available CMIP5 climate projections in the

framework of the Inter-Sectoral Impact Model Intercomparison Project (ISI-MIP; http://www.isi-mip.org/).

GHMs used:

H08, LPJmL, MPI-HM, PCR-GLOBWB, VIC, WaterGAP, WBM (all at a 0.5 degree grid or ≈50km by ≈50km at the equator) The GHMs calculate irrigation water requirement per unit crop area from daily soil water balance under four Representative Concentration Pathways (RCPs) from five Global Climate Models (GCMs) respectively.

RCPs used: RCP2.6, RCP4.5, RCP6.0, RCP8.5 GCMs used:

HadGEM2-ES, IPSL-CM5A-LR, GFDL-ESM2M, MIROC-ESM- CHEM, NorESM1-M

Output used: Potential irrigation water demand

Simulation period: 1971-2099 (Irrigated areas remain constant)

Future irrigation water demand under climate change: regional variability and uncertainties arising from GHMs and CMIP5 climate projections

Jacob Schewe 1 , Yoshihide Wada 2 , and Dominik Wisser 2,3

AGU 2012: H43C-1355: Ecohydrological Systems, Ecosystem Services, and Freshwater Sustainability: Modeling, Uncertainty, and Organizing Principles 1 Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research, Germany

2 Department of Physical Geography, Utrecht University, The Netherlands 3 Center for Development Research (ZEF), University of Bonn, Germany jacob.schewe@pik-potsdam.de, y.wada@uu.nl, dwisser@uni-bonn.de

Potential irrigation water demand in million m

3

yr

-1

AGU Fall Meeting 2012

San Francisco 3-7 December 2012

1. INTRODUCTION

2. METHODS – MODEL and DATA

3. RESULTS

4. CONCLUSIONS The irrigation sector uses by far the largest amount of water and

is responsible for 70% of the global water demand. At a country scale, irrigation water demand often exceeds 90% of the total water demand in many of developing countries such as India, China, Pakistan, where irrigation sustains much of food production and the livelihood of millions of people. The global area of irrigated land is not expected to expand dramatically in the coming decades. Future irrigation water demand is, however, subject to large uncertainties due to anticipated climate change, i.e. warming temperature and changing precipitation variability, in various regions of the world.

Ensemble mean (All) 2090s

2090s 2050s

The relative contribution of each source (GHMs, GCMs, RCPs) of uncertainty (fractional uncertainty; %) in irrigation water demand projections over the period 2005-2100, relative to the period the

1971–2005.

- Global irrigation water demand increased by ~6% by 2050 and ~10% by 2100 respectively primarily due to higher evaporative demand as a result of increased temperature (ensemble mean).

- Regional irrigation water demand decreased over some parts of Europe and Southeast Asia, but increased over South Asia, the U.S., the Middle East and Africa.

- The global and regional projections are highly uncertain over many parts of the world.

- The ensemble projections among the different GHMs, GCMs, and RCPs vary between - 30% and +35% for India, between -25% and +28 for the U.S., between -20% and +28%

for Mexico, between -22% and +26% for Pakistan, and between -22% and +24% for China.

- The model uncertainty among the different GHMs dominates the uncertainty in the irrigation water demand projections by ≈2025. However, afterwards the uncertainty of the climate projections, or specifically in the precipitation projections derived from different RCPs from different GCMs, substantially increases. Thus, the dominant sources of the uncertainty lie both in the GHMs and in the climate projections.

Ensemble coefficient of variation (All)

Coefficient of Variation [ - ] 10.9 0.80.7 0.6 0.50.40.3 0.2 0.1 0

Coefficient of Variation [ - ] 10.9 0.80.7 0.6 0.50.40.3 0.2 0.1 0

Coefficient of Variation [ - ] 10.9 0.8 0.7 0.6 0.5 0.40.3 0.2 0.1 0

Coefficient of Variation [ - ] 10.9 0.8 0.7 0.6 0.5 0.40.30.2 0.1 0

0 - 2 2 - 20 20 - 100 100 - 300 300 - 1000 > 1000

1

0.90.80.70.60.50.40.30.20.1 0

Coefficient of variation = the ratio of the standard deviation to the mean

Referenties

GERELATEERDE DOCUMENTEN

Since future projections do not only predict an increase in the annual number of extreme weather events due to the anthropogenic climate change but also in their

Under a failed transition, the extra risk premium that also compensates for higher standard deviations grows to approximately 160 basis points compared to a no global warming

Looking only at the event study method with this event selection, research question 2, whether the ECB's consideration of a more active role in the financing process

Als u door ziekte of om andere redenen verhinderd bent om uw afspraak na te komen, wordt u verzocht zo snel mogelijk contact op te nemen met de polikliniek longgeneeskunde. Als u

From the results of the simulations of isolated change in desalination capacity (presented in Table 4) it is clear that the extraction by desalination and the rate of evaporation

Attributing changes in the global hydrological system to land cover change, climate change, and water abstraction and irrigation, will im- prove projections of future changes in

Fig 6.: Projected changes in the contribution of snowmelt (Qs) to total surface water availability (Q) for selected river basins during the growing season(s). Global

Applying this typology to the twelve missions of the German Hightech Strategy, she underlined that different missions face specific types of challenges and therefore require