• No results found

Source of scattered light

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "Source of scattered light"

Copied!
16
0
0

Bezig met laden.... (Bekijk nu de volledige tekst)

Hele tekst

(1)

Baffles and cryostat : Scattered light noise

Jean-Yves VINET

(2)

Main beam

Mirror

Source of scattered light

( ) s x 

D

( ) s y 

Propagated scattered light = speckle D

Rough mirror

(3)

Hypotheses :

Distribution of scattered light vs scattering angle :

( )

2

p θ κ

≈ θ

0

g

w

θ λ

= π

For angles much larger than

LSD of seismic motion :

2

-8

10 Hz

( ) 10 m/ Hz

x f f

δ ≈

 

(4)

θ

D

2 2 2

2 0

1 ' '

2 2 2

(

( , , ') )exp exp

2

x x x x

kw ik

D D

C D x x

D p

θ π

ε

 − 

     

 

   

 

 =

 



Memory of the stored mode

Distribution of Scattered light : Mirror’s roughness

Integrated Scatt. losses

(5)

Emission of SL

Reflexion of SL 2d scattering

TEM00

TEM00

D1

1( ) s x

3( ) s x

2

( ) s x 

4( ) s x

Spurious (noisy) phase modulation caused by the coupling :

00, TEM s

γ =< >

Moving reflecting element

5( ) s x

D2

emitter

receiver

(6)

5 2 2 3 2 2 1 1

, s , M P ( . )m s , M P [ . (m P M )]

γ

=< Φ >=< Φ >=< Φ Φ >

M1

M1

M2

m D1

D2 s1

s2 s3 s4

s5 Φ

Φ

(7)

1 2

e

i ( )t

m x s ( )

D

( ) x s

D

( ) x dx

γ =

   

1 1 2 2

* m x m x ( ) ( ') * s

D

( ) x s

D

( ') * x s

D

( ) x s

D

( ') * x dxdx '

γγ = ∫        

2

. (

1

, , ')

* m x ( ) ( ') * m x C D x x . C D ( , , ' x x ) dxd x ' γγ

Γ ≡ = ∫        

Coupling coefficient with TEM00 :

Expectation value :

In terms of the speckle autocorrelation :

(8)

1/ 2 θ δ x f( )

= Γ

δ x λ

( ) δ x t

PSD of SL-noise : If

Reflecting element

θ

( )t 4π cos x t( )

φ θ δ

= λ

(9)

Possible cases of coupling

1) Direct reflection from elementary spots IM IM and EMEM

1) Transmission EM IM and IMEM via inner baffle edge

3) Transmission EM IM and IMEM via

spots on the inner edge

(10)

D

(α,β)

rC

Direct reflection

By reflecting element

Relevant parameters : -distance from mirror -Misaligment

(α,β)

(11)

D=0.9 m,

∆α

=0.46° D=1.5 m,

∆α

=0.28°

D=2.2 m,

∆α

=0.19° D=5 m,

∆α

=0.09°

β = 0

r

C

= D

S=10

-6

m

2

(12)

Case of input zone baffle  End mirror D=3000 m,

∆α

=0.04°

(13)

ROC of the reflecting element

(14)

Conclusions for small reflecting defects : -Unsensitive to ROC of the zone

-Sensitive to the distance

-Sensitive to the pointing error

Summary

2

-25 -1/2

2

-25 -1/2

2

-25 -1/2

-24

10 Hz

0.9 m : ( ) 3.65 10 Hz , 0.46°

10 Hz

1.5 m : ( ) 5.96 10 Hz , 0.28°

10 Hz

2.2 m : ( ) 8.53 10 Hz , 0.19°

10 Hz 5 m : ( ) 1.75 10

D h f

f

D h f

f

D h f

f

D h f

α α α

= = ∆ =

= = ∆ =

= = ∆ =

= =

2

Hz-1/2, α 0.09°

∆ =

(15)

θ

1

θ

2

1 2

2 α = θ θ +

1 2

2

µ = θ θ

α µ

D1 D2

Reflexion of scattered light by the inner edge of a baffle

or by a

reflecting element under

grazing incidence

(16)

D=0.9 m ,

∆α

=0.33° D=1.5 m, Da=0.20°

D=5 m,

∆α

=0.07°

D=2.2 m,

∆α

=0.14°

Referenties

GERELATEERDE DOCUMENTEN

Solution Hendrik Reuvers and Jaap Spies submitted partial solutions. This subring

Does there exist a k for which the students can coordinate 1 their answers such that it is guaranteed that at least one student passes the exam. Solution We received solutions from

Solution Solutions were submitted by Hans Samuels Brusse, Hendrik Reuvers and Paul Hutschemakers. The solution below is based on the solution

This Problem Section is open to everyone; everybody is encouraged to send in solutions and propose problems.. Group contributions

is it then possible to divide each single bag into proper subsets of equal weight? Again, it turns out that this is not always possible, but the simplest example that we know has

Solution We received solutions from Raymond van Bommel, Josephine Buskes, Alex Heinis, Thijmen Krebs, Hendrik Reuvers, Djurre Tijsma, Steven Troch, Traian Viteam and Robert van

Gabriele Dalla Torre Christophe Debry Jinbi Jin Marco Streng Wouter Zomervrucht Problemenrubriek NAW Mathematisch Instituut Universiteit Leiden Postbus 9512 2300 RA

Oplossingen | Solutions Solution We received solutions from Johan Commelin and Raymond van Bommel, Alex. Heinis and