Modality in typological perspective - Bibliography

UvA-DARE is a service provided by the library of the University of Amsterdam (https://dare.uva.nl)

UvA-DARE (Digital Academic Repository)

Modality in typological perspective

Publication date 2008

Link to publication

Citation for published version (APA):

Nauze, F. D. (2008). Modality in typological perspective. Institute for Logic, Language and Computation.

General rights

It is not permitted to download or to forward/distribute the text or part of it without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), other than for strictly personal, individual use, unless the work is under an open content license (like Creative Commons).

Disclaimer/Complaints regulations

If you believe that digital publication of certain material infringes any of your rights or (privacy) interests, please let the Library know, stating your reasons. In case of a legitimate complaint, the Library will make the material inaccessible and/or remove it from the website. Please Ask the Library: https://uba.uva.nl/en/contact, or a letter to: Library of the University of Amsterdam, Secretariat, Singel 425, 1012 WP Amsterdam, The Netherlands. You will be contacted as soon as possible.

Aboh, E. O.: 2004, The Morphosyntax of Complement-Head Sequences: Clause

Structure and Word Order Patterns in Kwa, Oxford University Press,

Ox-ford, New York.

Aboh, E. O.: 2006, Complementation in Saramaccan and Gungbe: The case of C-type modal particles, Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 24, 1–55. van der Auwera, J. and Ammann, A.: 2005, Overlap between epistemic and

situational possibility, in M. Haspelmath, M. S. Dryer, D. Gil and B. Comrie (eds), World Atlas of Language Structures, Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 310–313.

van der Auwera, J., Ammann, A. and Kindt, S.: 2005, Modal polyfunctionality and Standard Average European, Modality: Studies in form and function, Equinox Publishing Ltd., London, chapter 11, pp. 247–272.

van der Auwera, J. and Plungian, V. A.: 1998, Modality’s semantic map,

Lin-guistic Typology 2(1), 79–124.

Avolonto, A.: 1992, Les particules modales en f`Ongb`e et la nature de INFL dans les phrases injonctives, in C. Collins and V. Manfredi (eds), Proceedings of

the Kwa Comparative Syntax Workshop, Vol. 17 of MIT Working Papers in Linguistics, MIT Press, pp. 27–40.

Bach, E.: 1982, Purpose clauses and control, in P. Jacobson and G. K. Pullum (eds), The Nature of Syntactic Representation, D. Reidel Publishing Com-pany.

Barbiers, S.: 2006, The syntax of modal auxiliaries, in M. Everaert and H. van Riemsdijk (eds), The Blackwell Companion to Syntax, Vol. 5, Blackwell Pub-lishing, Oxford, chapter 70, pp. 1–22.

230 Bibliography

Besnier, N.: 1988, Semantic and pragmatic contraints on Tuvaluan raising,

Lin-guistics 26, 747–778.

Besnier, N.: 2000, Tuvaluan: A Polynesian Language of the Central Pacific, Routledge, London and New York.

Brennan, V.: 1993, Root and Epistemic Modal Auxiliary Verbs, PhD thesis, Uni-versity of Massachusetts, Amherst.

Brown, M. A.: 1988, On the logic of ability, Journal of Philosophical Logic 17, 1– 26.

Bybee, J., Perkins, R. and Pagliuca, W.: 1994, The Evolution of Grammar:

Tense, Aspect, and Modality in the Languages of the World, The University

of Chicago Press, Chicago and London.

Capo, H. B. C.: 1991, A Comparative Phonology of Gbe, number 14 in

Publica-tions in African Languages and Linguistics, Foris PublicaPublica-tions, Berlin and

New York.

Chung, S. and Seiter, W. J.: 1980, The history of raising and relativization in Polynesian, Language 56(3), 622–638.

Cinque, G.: 1999, Adverbs and Funtional Heads: a Cross-linguistic Perspective, Oxford studies in comparative syntax, Oxford University Press, New York. Cinque, G.: 2001, A note on mood, modality, tense and aspect affixes in Turkish,

in E. E. Taylan (ed.), The Verb in Turkish, Vol. 44 of Linguistik aktuell,

John Benjamins, Amsterdam, pp. 47–59.

Comrie, B.: 1989, Language Universals and Linguistic Typology, second edn, Basil Blackwell, Oxford.

Condoravdi, C.: 2001, Temporal interpretation of modals: Modals for the present and for the past, in D. Beaver, S. Kaufmann, B. Clark and L. Casillas (eds),

Stanford Papers on Semantics, CSLI Publications, Stanford, California.

Corcu, D.: 2003, The scope of epistemic modal adverbs on deontic necessity in Turkish and English, in M. Stede and H. Zeevat (eds), Proceedings of

ESS-LLI’03 Workshop ‘The Meaning and Implementation of Discourse Particles’.

Croft, W.: 2003, Typology and Universals, Cambridge Textbooks in Linguistics, second edn, Cambridge University Press.

Davis, H., Matthewson, L. and Rullmann, H.: 2006, Modality in St’´at’imcets and its implications. handout from a talk at TAM TAM: Cross-linguistic semantics of Tense, Aspect, and Modality, Radboud University Nijmegen, November 15 & 16.

Davis, H., Matthewson, L. and Rullmann, H.: to appear, ‘out of control’ marking as circumstantial modality in St’´at’imcets, Proceedings of the TAM TAM

workshop.

Demirdache, H.: 1997, ‘Out of Control’ in Salish and Event (De)Composition, in A. Mendikoetxea and M. Uribe-Etxebarria (eds), Theoretical Issues at the

Morphology-Syntax Interface, University of the Basque Country.

E-ANS: 2004. electronic version of (Haeseryn et al. 1997), http://oase.uci.

kun.nl/~ans/.

URL: http://oase.uci.kun.nl/ ans/

van Eijk, J.: 1997, The Lillooet Language: Phonology, Morphology, Syntax, First Nations Languages, UBC Press, Vancouver.

Faller, M.: 2002, Semantics and Pragmatics of Evidentials in Cuzco Quechua, PhD thesis, Stanford University.

Fehringer, C.: 1999, A Reference Grammar of Dutch, Cambridge University Press.

Feldman, F.: 1986, Doing the Best We Can: An Essay in Informal Deontic Logic, Reidel.

von Fintel, K.: 2006, Modality and Language, in D. M. Borchert (ed.),

Encyclo-pedia of Philosophy, second edn, MacMillan, Detroit.

URL: http://mit.edu/fintel/www/modality.pdf

von Fintel, K. and Iatridou, S.: 2004, What to do if you want to go to Harlem: Anankastic conditionals and related matters. ms.

URL: http://mit.edu/fintel/www/harlem.pdf

von Fintel, K. and Iatridou, S.: 2006, How to say Ought in foreign: The compo-sition of weak necessity modals. draft.

von Fintel, K. and Iatridou, S.: 2007, Anatomy of a modal construction,

Linguis-tic Inquiry 38(3), 445–483.

Fontein, A. M. and Pescher-ter Meer, A.: 2000, Nederlandse Grammatica voor

Anderstaligen, Nederlands Centrum Buitenlanders.

Frank, A.: 1997, Context Dependence in Modal Constructions, PhD thesis, Uni-versity of Stuttgart.

Geurts, B.: 2004, On an ambiguity in quantified conditionals. ms.

232 Bibliography

G¨oksel, A. and Kerslake, C.: 2005, Turkish: A Comprehensive Grammar, Rout-legde, New York.

Greenberg, J.: 1974, Language Typology: A Historical and Analytical Overview, Mounton, The Hague.

Groenendijk, J., Stokhof, M. and Veltman, F.: 1996, Coreference and modality,

in S. Lapin (ed.), Handbook of Contemporary Semantic Theory, Blackwell,

Oxford, pp. 179–216.

de Haan, F.: 1997, The Interaction of Modality and Negation: A Typological

Study, Outstanding dissertations in linguistics, Garland Publishing, New

York & London.

de Haan, F.: 2000, The relation between modality and evidentiality, Linguistische

Berichten .

Hackl, M.: 1998, On the semantics of “ability attributions”. unpublished draft. Haeseryn, W., Romijn, K., Geerts, G., de Rooij, J. and van den Toorn, M.: 1997,

Algemene Nederlandse Spraakkunst, second edn, Martinus Nijhoff

uitgev-ers/Wolters Plantyn.

Haspelmath, M., Dryer, M. S., Gil, D. and Comrie, B.: 2005, The World Atlas

of Language Structure, Oxford University Press.

Hengeveld, K.: 2004, Illocution, mood and modality, in G. Booij, C. Lehmann, J. Mugdan and S. Skopeteas (eds), Morphology: An International Handbook

on Inflection and Word-Formation, Vol. 2, Walter de Gruyter, Berlin.

Huitink, J.: 2004, Analyzing anankastic conditionals. Presentation at Sinn und Bedeutung 9, Nijmegen.

Iatridou, S.: 2000, The grammatical ingredients of counterfactuality, Linguistic

Inquiry 31(2), 231–270.

Izvorski, R.: 1997, The present perfect as an epistemic modal, in A. Lawson (ed.),

Proceedings of SALT VII, CLC Publications.

Jackendoff, R.: 1972, Semantic interpretation in generative grammar, MIT Press, Cambridge.

Karttunen, L.: 1972, Possible and must, in J. Kimball (ed.), Syntax and

Seman-tics, Vol. 1, Academic Press, New York, pp. 1–20.

Kenny, A.: 1976, Human abilities and dynamic modalities, in J. Manninen and R. Tuomela (eds), Essays on Explanation and Understanding, Reidel Pub-lishing Company, pp. 209–232.

Kornfilt, J.: 1997, Turkish, Descriptive grammars, Routledge, London.

Kratzer, A.: 1976, Was “k¨onnen” und “n¨ussen” bedeuten k¨unnen m¨ussen,

Lin-guistische Berichten 42, 128–160.

Kratzer, A.: 1978, Semantik der Rede: Kontexttheorie, Modalw¨orter, Kondition-als¨atze, Scriptor, K¨onigstein.

Kratzer, A.: 1981, The notional category of modality, in H. J. Eikmeyer and H. Rieser (eds), Words, Worlds and Contexts. New Approaches in Word

Semantics, Walter de Gruyter, Berlin, pp. 38–74. Reprinted in Portner &

Partee (Portner and Partee 2002), 289-323.

Kratzer, A.: 1991, Modality/Conditionals, in A. von Stechow and D. Wun-derlich (eds), Semantik: ein internationales Handbuch der zeitgen¨ ossis-chen Forschung, Vol. 6 of Handb¨ucher zur Sprach- und Kommunikation-swissenschaft, Walter de Gruyter, Berlin, pp. 639–656.

Lambert-Br´eti`ere, R.: 2005, Les Construction S´erielles en Fon: Approche Ty-pologique, PhD thesis, Universit´e Lumi`ere Lyon 2.

Lee, H. H. B.: 1989, Korean Grammar, Oxford University Press.

Lefebvre, C. and Brousseau, A.-M.: 2002, A Grammar of Fongbe, Mouton de Gruyter, Berlin, New York.

Lewis, D. K.: 1973, Counterfactuals, Basil Blackwell, Oxford.

Lewis, G. L.: 1975, Turkish Grammar, second edn, Oxford University Press. Mastop, R.: 2005, What Can You Do? Imperative Mood in Semantic Theory,

PhD thesis, ILLC Dissertation Series. Mastop, R.: 2007, On granting choices. ms.

Matthewson, L.: 2001, Quantification and the nature of crosslinguistic variation,

Natural Language Semantics 9, 145–189.

Matthewson, L.: 2005, When I Was Small - I Wan Kwikws, First Nations Lan-guages, UBC Press, Vancouver, Toronto.

Matthewson, L., Rullmann, H. and Davis, H.: 2005, Modality in St’´at’imcets,

Papers for the 40th International Conference on Salish and Neighbouring Languages.

234 Bibliography

Matthewson, L., Rullmann, H. and Davis, H.: 2006, Evidentials are epistemic modals in St’´at’imcets, in M. Kiyota, J. L. Thompson and N. Yamane-Tanaka (eds), Papers for the 41st international conference on Salish and

neighbouring languages, University of British Columbia Working Papers in

Linguistics, Vancouver, BC, pp. 211–263.

McCarthy, J.: 1980, Circumscription: A form of non-monotonic reasoning,

Arti-ficial Intelligence 13, 27–39.

Mithun, M.: 1991, Active/agentive case marking and its motivations, Language

67(3), 510–546.

Nauze, F.: to appear, Modality and context dependence, in L. Hogeweg, H. de Hoop and A. Malˇcukov (eds), Proceedings of TAM TAM Workshop, John Benjamins Publishing Company.

Nissenbaum, J.: 2005, Kissing Pedro Martinez: (existential) anankastic condi-tionals and rationale clauses, Semantics and Linguistic Theory 15.

Nuyts, J.: 2001, Epistemic Modality, Language, and Conceptualization: A Cognitive-Pragmatic Perspective, Vol. 5 of Human Cognitive Processing,

Ben-jamins, Amsterdam.

Nuyts, J.: 2004, Over de (beperkte) combineerbaarheid van deontische,

epis-temische en evidenti¨ele uitdrukkingen in het Nederlands, number 108 in Antwerp Papers in Linguistics, Department of Linguistics of the University

of Antwerp.

Nuyts, J., Byloo, P. and Diepeveen, J.: 2005, On deontic modality, directivity, and mood: A case study of Dutch mogen and moeten, Antwerp Papers in

Linguistics 110.

Otsuka, Y.: 2000, Ergativity in Tongan, PhD thesis, Linacre College, University of Oxford.

Otsuka, Y.: 2001, Empty categories in Tuvaluan: NP-trace, PRO, pro, or vari-able?, Oceanic Linguistics 40(2), 342–365. Review Article of (Besnier 2000). Palmer, F. R.: 1986, Mood and Modality, Cambridge Textbooks in Linguistics,

Cambridge University Press.

Palmer, F. R.: 2001, Mood and Modality, Cambridge Textbooks in Linguistics, second edn, Cambridge University Press.

Portner, P.: 2003, The meaning and force of imperatives, Paper presented at the workshop “Conditional and Unconditional Modality” (ESSLLI 2003, Vi-enna).

Portner, P.: 2007, Imperatives and modals, Natural Language Semantics 15, 351– 383.

Portner, P. and Partee, B. H. (eds): 2002, Formal Semantics: The Essential

Readings, Blackwell.

Rijkhoff, J., Bakker, D., Hengeveld, K. and Kahrel, P.: 1993, A method of lan-guage sampling, Studies in Lanlan-guage 17(1), 169–203.

Ruhlen, M.: 1987, A guide to the World’s Languages, Vol. 1: Classification, Edward Arnold, London.

Rullmann, H., Matthewson, L. and Davis, H.: 2006, Modals as distributive in-definites. ms.

Sæbø, K. J.: 2001, Necessary conditions in a natural language, in C. F´ery and W. Sternefeld (eds), Audiatur Vox Sapientiae. A Festschrift for Arnim von

Stechow, Akademie Verlag, Berlin, pp. 427–449.

Sava¸sır, ˙I.: 1986, Habits and abilities in Turkish, in D. I. Slobin and K. Zimmer (eds), Studies in Turkish Linguistics, Vol. 8, John Benjamins Publishing Company, pp. 137–146.

Schiering, R.: 2006, Morphologization in turkish: Implications for phonology in grammaticalization, Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on

Turkish Linguistics.

Schulz, K.: 2007, Minimal Models in Semantics and Pragmatics, PhD thesis, ILLC.

Schwager, M.: 2005, Exhaustive imperatives, in P. Dekker and M. Franke (eds), Proceedings of the Fifteenth Amsterdam Colloquium : December 19-21, pp. 233–238.

Seiter, W. J.: 1980, Studies in Niuean Syntax, Outstanding Dissertation in Lin-guistics, Garland Publishing, New York & London.

Shaw, I. S.: 1980, Stackability of modalities, Kansas Working Papers in

Linguis-tics 5(1), 115–131.

Shetter, W. Z. and Van der Gruysse-Van Antwerpen, I.: 2002, Dutch: An

Essen-tial Grammar, 8th edn, Routledge, London and New York.

von Stechow, A., Krasikova, S. and Penka, D.: 2004, The meaning of German

um zu: Necessary condition and enough/too. Workshop Modal Verbs and

236 Bibliography

von Stechow, A., Krasikova, S. and Penka, D.: 2006, Anankastic conditionals again. ms.

Thomason, R. H.: 2005, Ability, action, and context. draft msc.

Van Ostaeyen, G. and Nuyts, J.: 2004, De diachronie van kunnen, Antwerp Papers

in Linguistics 109.

Veltman, F.: 1996, Defaults in update semantics, Journal of Philosophical Logic

25(3), 221–261.

Veltman, F.: 2007, Who says so? Imperatives at the semantics/pragmatics inter-face. RUC-ILLC Workshop on Deontic Logic, November 8-9.

Wekenon Tokponto, M.: 2002, Deutsch-beninische M¨archenforschung am Beispiel von M¨archen in der Fon-Sprache mit phonetischer Transkription, Studie und Darstellung der Hauptfiguren und Themenvergleich, PhD thesis, Fakult¨at f¨ur Linguistik und Literaturwissenschaft, Universit¨at Bielefed.

Wilson, S. and Saygın, A. P.: 2001, Adverbs and functional heads in Turkish: Linear order and scope, Proceedings of WECOL 2001: Western Conference

on Linguistics, Seattle, WA.

von Wright, G. H.: 1963, Norm and Action: A Logical Enquiry, Routledge and Kegan Paul, London.

Wurmbrand, S.: 1999, Modal verbs must be raising verbs, in S. Bird, A. Carnie, J. Haugen and P. Norquest (eds), WCCFL 18 Proceedings, Cascadilla Press, Somerville, MA, pp. 599–612.

Wurmbrand, S. and Bobaljik, J.: 1999, Modals, raising, and a-reconstruction, handout.

Wymann, A. T.: 1996a, Aspects of mood and modality in Korean and Japanese,

Towards a Typology of Modality: The encoding of modal attitudes in English, Turkish, Korean, Japanese, and Tagalog, Institut f¨ur Sprachwissenschaft, Universit¨at Bern, chapter 4, pp. 55–90.

Wymann, A. T.: 1996b, The Expression of Modality in Korean, PhD thesis, Universit¨at Bern.

Zvolenszky, Z.: 2002, Is a possible-worlds semantics of modality possible? A problem for Kratzer’s semantics, in B. Jackson (ed.), Proceedings of SALT