• No results found

Lernanto: An ambient display to support differentiated instruction

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "Lernanto: An ambient display to support differentiated instruction"

Copied!
3
0
0

Bezig met laden.... (Bekijk nu de volledige tekst)

Hele tekst

(1)

Lernanto

Citation for published version (APA):

van Alphen, E., & Bakker, S. (2015). Lernanto: An ambient display to support differentiated instruction. 759-760. Poster session presented at CSCL 2015 conference on Computer Supported Collaborative Learning,

Gothenburg, Sweden.

Document status and date: Published: 01/01/2015 Document Version:

Publisher’s PDF, also known as Version of Record (includes final page, issue and volume numbers) Please check the document version of this publication:

• A submitted manuscript is the version of the article upon submission and before peer-review. There can be important differences between the submitted version and the official published version of record. People interested in the research are advised to contact the author for the final version of the publication, or visit the DOI to the publisher's website.

• The final author version and the galley proof are versions of the publication after peer review.

• The final published version features the final layout of the paper including the volume, issue and page numbers.

Link to publication

General rights

Copyright and moral rights for the publications made accessible in the public portal are retained by the authors and/or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. • Users may download and print one copy of any publication from the public portal for the purpose of private study or research. • You may not further distribute the material or use it for any profit-making activity or commercial gain

• You may freely distribute the URL identifying the publication in the public portal.

If the publication is distributed under the terms of Article 25fa of the Dutch Copyright Act, indicated by the “Taverne” license above, please follow below link for the End User Agreement:

www.tue.nl/taverne

Take down policy

If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact us at:

openaccess@tue.nl

providing details and we will investigate your claim.

(2)

Lernanto:

An Ambient Display to Support Differentiated Instruction

Erik van Alphen, University of Amsterdam and Theresialyceum, e.v.alphen@theresialyceum.nl Saskia Bakker, Eindhoven University of Technology, s.bakker@tue.nl

Abstract: This paper presents Lernanto, an ambient display designed for secondary school

classrooms, aimed at supporting teachers in challenging each student at his or her own level, i.e. differentiated instruction. Lernanto displays real-time information about the progress of each individual student such that teachers can perceive it at a glance during their lessons.

Keywords: peripheral interaction, ambient display, classroom technology, classroom orchestration

Introduction

Today’s classrooms are characterizing by a growing diversity among students. Classes tend to increase in number of students, while at the same time there is an increasing social emphasis on and appreciation for excellence. Teachers are therefore encouraged to challenge each student at his or her own level, i.e. differentiated instruction (Ysseldyke and Tardrew 2007). Addressing this trend, adaptive educational software that adjusts its learning material to the individual student is being introduced in various schools. When using such software, students are thus working on different exercises depending on their level. This raises new challenges for teachers (Ysseldyke and Tardrew 2007): they have to divide their sparse time and attention without having a clear overview of the current progress of each individual student. Particularly in secondary schools, where teachers provide lessons to multiple different classes and thus to up to hundreds of students, it is difficult to be aware of individual levels and needs.

Lernanto aims to support teachers in providing differentiated instruction and structuring teamwork by leveraging data from (adaptive) educational software. This paper presents Lernanto’s design and discusses the evaluation setup of an in-progress field study.

Related work

Most (adaptive) educational software includes a “dashboard” (e.g. www.knowre.com), which displays the real-time performance of each individual student by means of graphs or tables on the teacher’s computer. To access this information, teachers thus need to focus their attention toward the screen during lessons, rather than towards their students, which may reduce the time available for instructions. However, real-time progress information can majorly support the teacher in providing differentiated instruction: it allows them to spend more time on individual instructions and enables them to better meet the individual student’s needs (Ysseldyke and Tardrew 2007). An alternative approach to access such information involves peripheral interaction (Bakker et al., 2013) or ambient displays (Hazlewood et al., 2011); presenting useful information in a subtle manner such that it can be perceived with minimum attention. FireFlies (Bakker et al., 2013), for example, displays information such as division of turns, on primary school children’s desks through light, which teachers can perceive at a glance. Lantern (Alavi et al., 2009) is a light object on students’ desks that presents information about the current exercise they are working on. Lernanto adds to this existing work by using an ambient display to flexibly display real-time information to teachers during lessons in the context of differentiated instruction. Different from the mentioned related designs, Lernanto is located on the classroom wall rather than on the students’ desk. As a result, the presented information is readily available to the teacher, while distractions for students are minimized. However, the information is still visible to students. The effects of this on the student’s experience are not known from related work; we intend to evaluate this when deploying Lernanto in a school.

Lernanto’s design and evaluation setup

Lernanto is a display at the back-wall of a secondary school classroom (see Figure 1a) consisting of several octagon shapes that can emit colored light, each representing one student. The aim of Lernanto is to subtly display information about the real-time progress of each individual student, supporting teachers in gaining quick insight in which student might deserve their attention. This insight is expected to relieve the teacher’s cognitive load, as the need to remember this information is taken away. Indicators chosen to represent the progress of students are the assignment or domain a student is working on (indicated by color) and the pace of work (indicated by the ‘fill’ of the octagon, see Figure 1c). The pace of each student differs depending on his or her level. Pace is therefore presented on a personal scale, relative to the individual expected level, which is

(3)

determined by earlier achievements. When a student is performing as can be expected, the octagon is equally filled, while unequal fill indicates performance slower or faster than expected, see Figure 1c.

(a) (b) (c)

Figure 1. (a) Illustration of Lernanto situated in a (hypothetical) classroom (image source: blenderartists.org); (b) the prototype version of Lernanto; and (c) the pace indication for individual students: at expected pace (top),

below (middle) and above (bottom) expected pace.

To make sure the teacher can quickly and easily interpret which student is represented by which octagon, Lernanto’s 2 dimensional space is mapped to the physical location of students in the room. To evaluate Lernanto’s usefulness as a support tool for teachers, we have developed a working prototype (see Figure 1b). We are currently running a field study with Lernanto. The prototype uses data from an adaptive educational software system (www.got-it.nl), which is being used during an arithmetic course. At the start of this course the students take a test to determine their level concerning arithmetic skills. During the field-study, the results of this test are used to determine the expected pace for each individual student. The software provides assignments fitting the needs of each individual student in one of four different domains within arithmetic (e.g. numbers, geometry), which are represented by four different colors in the prototype. Lernanto thus provides the teacher with real-time information about both the domain of the current exercise and the current pace of each individual student.

Conclusions

This paper presents the design of Lernanto, an ambient display to support differentiated instruction and teamwork. Lernanto presents real-time information about the progress of individual students and the subject they are working on, designed to be perceivable at a glance. This information is intended to help teachers in identifying, at any moment during the lesson, which students might need or deserve their attention. It also intends to help teachers to group students working on the same subject for instruction or teamwork. Thereby, this paper contributes an alternative approach to provide teachers with real-time information during lessons, which is to blend into the environment such that part of the teacher’s cognitive load is relieved.

References

Alavi, H.S., Dillenbourg, P., and Kaplan, F. (2009). Distributed Awareness for Class Orchestration. In Proceedings EC-TEL ’07: The 4th European Conference on Technology Enhanced Learning. pp. 211– 225. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag.

Bakker, S., Hoven, E. van den, Eggen, B. (2013). FireFlies: Physical Peripheral Interaction Design for the Everyday Routine of Primary School Teachers. In Proceedings of TEI ’13: The 7th International

Conference on Tangible, Embedded and Embodied Interaction. pp. 57–64. New York, NY, USA:

ACM.

Hazlewood, W.R., Stolterman, E., and Connelly, K. (2011). Issues in Evaluating Ambient Displays in the Wild: Two Case Studies. In Proceedings of CHI ’11: The 2011 Annual Conference on Human Factors in

Computing Systems. pp. 877–886. New York, NY, USA: ACM.

Ysseldyke, J., and Tardrew, S. (2007). Use of a Progress Monitoring System to Enable Teachers to Differentiate Mathematics Instruction. Journal of Applied School Psychology 24(1): 1–28.

Referenties

GERELATEERDE DOCUMENTEN

Next to increasing a leader’s future time orientation, it is also expected that high levels of cognitive complexity will result in a greater past and present time orientation..

In additional ANOVA analyses, containing the variable General health interest, it turned out that Assortment structure did have a significant positive direct effect on the

Estimation of the expected value of regular lessons and of di fferentiated instruction, perceived advantages and disadvantages, and student appreciation After the first cycle,

For additional background on the theory and practice of applied theatre, see Richard Boon and Jane Plastow, eds., Theatre and Empowerment: Community Drama on the World

With regard to differentiated instruction, teachers with a high level of teaching self-efficacy believe that they are capable to modify the class according to the

Peace of Mind Does this device provide a measure of peace of mind to the user.. Safety Does this device afford an increased feeling of safety to

However, two alternatives could be considered instead: a training for primary school teachers with regard to differentiation and an instructional video in which an

In the study reported in this article, we investigated whether student science teachers’ efficacy for teaching in classes they consider difficult can be enhanced by providing them