• No results found

3D printed graphene-coated flexible lattice as piezoresistive presure sensor

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "3D printed graphene-coated flexible lattice as piezoresistive presure sensor"

Copied!
2
0
0

Bezig met laden.... (Bekijk nu de volledige tekst)

Hele tekst

(1)

University of Groningen

3D printed graphene-coated flexible lattice as piezoresistive presure sensor Kamat, Amar M; Kottapalli, Ajay Giri Prakash

IMPORTANT NOTE: You are advised to consult the publisher's version (publisher's PDF) if you wish to cite from it. Please check the document version below.

Document Version

Publisher's PDF, also known as Version of record Publication date:

2021

Link to publication in University of Groningen/UMCG research database

Citation for published version (APA):

Kamat, A. M., & Kottapalli, A. G. P. (Accepted/In press). 3D printed graphene-coated flexible lattice as piezoresistive presure sensor. Poster session presented at Transducers 2021, .

Copyright

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download or to forward/distribute the text or part of it without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license (like Creative Commons).

Take-down policy

If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact us providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim.

Downloaded from the University of Groningen/UMCG research database (Pure): http://www.rug.nl/research/portal. For technical reasons the number of authors shown on this cover page is limited to 10 maximum.

(2)

B4-411d

3D PRINTED GRAPHENE-COATED FLEXIBLE LATTICE

AS PIEZORESISTIVE PRESSURE SENSOR

Amar M. Kamat

1,*

and Ajay Giri Prakash Kottapalli

1,2

1

Advanced Production Engineering, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands

2

MIT Sea Grant College Program, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, USA

*

a.m.kamat@rug.nl

Background

- Piezoresistive sponges are a popular design for flexible pressure sensors. - Advantages: higher strain, light weight, fast recovery time, low hysteresis.

- Traditional methods (direct templating, emulsion templating, gas forming, etc.) do not afford good control on sponge microstructure and properties.

Sensor fabrication

Methodology

- Utilize design freedom of stereolithography (SLA) 3D printing to fabricate elastic foams with desired structure (e.g. body-centered cubic) and properties.

- Dip-coat lattice structure with graphene nanoparticles (GNP) to make it piezoresistive. - High gauge factor of GNP + compressible elastomeric BCC lattice = high sensitivity.

Sensor characterization

Summary and conclusions

Ref. Gauge factor

Sensitivity

(kPa-1) Materials

This work 3.25 0.1 Formlabs elastic resin BCC lattice + GNP

Ref. [1] 0.38 0.023 Polyurethane sponge

+ carbon black

Ref. [2] 1.58 N/A Polyurethane sponge +

cellulose/Ag nanowire

Ref. [3] N/A 0.033 PDMS sponge + CNT

Stress-strain curve Static test

Dynamic test (1 Hz) Comparison with the literature

- Piezoresistive pressure sensor showed low stiffness (31.5 kPa), high compressibility (up to 60%), high gauge factor (3.25) and sensitivity (0.1 kPa-1).

- 3D printing workflow can enable better control over sensor properties (e.g. tunable stiffness, density, porosity) compared to traditional methods of making spongy sensors.

[1] X. Wu et al., Adv. Funct. Mater., vol. 26, no. 34, pp. 6246–6256, 2016

[2] S. Zhang et al., ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces, vol. 11, no. 11, pp. 10922–10932, 2019 [3] Y. Song et al., Small, vol. 13, no. 39, p. 1702091, Oct. 2017

This work was funded by the ITEA DayTime (ITEA-2018-17030-Daytime) and the NWO Idea Generator (NWA.1228.192.279) projects. The authors thank Melvin van der Werff for his help with lattice design.

Referenties

GERELATEERDE DOCUMENTEN

Publisher’s PDF, also known as Version of Record (includes final page, issue and volume numbers) Please check the document version of this publication:.. • A submitted manuscript is

It calculates what is the maximum deflection of the bottom surface when pressure is applied on the sensor using the ultrasound probe and when the sensor encounters cancerous

Figure 2.5 shows the effect of changing the flow velocity on the thermal profile inside the fluidic channel for both distilled water and olive oil... Effect Of Changing

In these simulations the strain gauge length/height is set at 10% of the height of the sensor, and e is taken to be 0.8 mm for the large model and taken 0.4 mm for the small and

Figure 5.5: Resistance and capacitance change for both strain gauges when a force is applied to the whisker.. Comparing the different subplots of Figure 5.5 it can clearly be seen

However, the manager of the Flair Mania bar academy, and the manger of the Indian Professional bartending academy taught me that Indian female bartenders don’t work in one

The reason why the context of this thesis does not immediately fit the frame of the crisis reform thesis is that the disaster management system of Queensland was

Abstract - We show that the output of a 3D printed, flexible tactile sensor can be improved markedly using a differential measurementI. We 3D printed a cantilever beam with