• No results found

Disentangling deceptive communication : situation and person characteristics as determinants of lying in everyday life - References

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "Disentangling deceptive communication : situation and person characteristics as determinants of lying in everyday life - References"

Copied!
7
0
0

Bezig met laden.... (Bekijk nu de volledige tekst)

Hele tekst

(1)

UvA-DARE (Digital Academic Repository)

Disentangling deceptive communication : situation and person characteristics as

determinants of lying in everyday life

Backbier, E.H.F.

Publication date

2001

Link to publication

Citation for published version (APA):

Backbier, E. H. F. (2001). Disentangling deceptive communication : situation and person

characteristics as determinants of lying in everyday life. Thela Thesis.

General rights

It is not permitted to download or to forward/distribute the text or part of it without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), other than for strictly personal, individual use, unless the work is under an open content license (like Creative Commons).

Disclaimer/Complaints regulations

If you believe that digital publication of certain material infringes any of your rights or (privacy) interests, please let the Library know, stating your reasons. In case of a legitimate complaint, the Library will make the material inaccessible and/or remove it from the website. Please Ask the Library: https://uba.uva.nl/en/contact, or a letter to: Library of the University of Amsterdam, Secretariat, Singel 425, 1012 WP Amsterdam, The Netherlands. You will be contacted as soon as possible.

(2)

Ajzen,, I. & Fishbein, M. (1980). Understanding attitudes and predicting social behavior. Englewoodd Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

Ajzen,, I. (1985). From intentions to actions: A theory of planned behavior. In J. Kuhl & J. Beckmannn (Eds.), Action-control: From cognition to behavior, (pp. 11-39). Heidelberg:: Springer.

Baarda,, D. B., Goede, de, M. P. M. & Teunissen, J. (1995). Basisboek Kwalitatief

Onderzoek.Onderzoek. Praktische handleiding voor het opzetten en uitvoeren van kwalitatief onderzoek.onderzoek. Houten: Educatieve Partners Nederland B.V..

Backbier,, E. (1994). Liegen in dagelijkse situaties: focusgroepinterviews. Intern verslag, Faculteitt der Psychologie, Vakgroep Psychologische Methodenleer, Universiteit vann Amsterdam.

Barnes,, J. A. (1994). A pack of lies. Cambridge University Press.

Baumeister,, R. F. (1993). Lying to yourself. In M. Lewis & C. Saarai (Eds.), Lying and deceptiondeception in everyday life (pp. 166-183). New York: Guilford Press. Bavelas,, J. B., Black, A., Chovil, N. & Mullett, J. (1990). Equivocal Communication.

Newburyy Park: Sage.

Beck,, L. & Ajzen, I. (1991). Predicting dishonest actions using the theory of planned behavior.. Journal of Research in Personality, 25, 285-301.

Bok,, S. (1978). Lying: moral choice in public and private life. New York: Vintage Books. Brink,, van den, W. P. & Koele, P. (1987). Statistiek Deel 3: Toepassingen. Meppel:

Boom. .

Buller,, D. B. & Burgoon, J.K. (1994). Deception: Strategic and nonstrategic communication.. In J. A. Daly & J. M. Wiemann (Eds.), Strategic Interpersonal CommunicationCommunication (pp. 191-223). Hillsdale, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum. Buller,, D. B. & Burgoon, J. K. (1996). Interpersonal Deception Theory. Communication

Theory,Theory, 6, 3, 203 -242.

Burgoon,, M., Callister, M. & Hansaker, F. G. (1994). Patients who deceive. An empirical investigationn of patient-physician communication. Journal of Language and Social Psychology,Psychology, 13, 4,443-468.

Camden,, C , Mothey, M. T. & Wilson, A. (1984). White Lies in interpersonal communication.. Western Journal of Speech Communication, 48, 309-325.

(3)

References References

Christie,, R. & Geis, F. L. (1970). Studies in Machiavellianism. New York: Academic Press. .

Coleman,, L. & Kay, P. (1981). Prototype semantics: The English word lie. Language, 57, 26-44. .

Crowne,, D. P. & Marlowe, D. (1964). The approval motive. Studies in evaluative dependence.dependence. New York: Wiley.

DePaulo,, B. M. & Rosenthal, R. (1979). Telling Lies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,Psychology, 70,1713-1722.

DePaulo,, B. M., Epstein, J. A. & Wyer, M. M. (1993). Sex differences in lying: How womenn and men deal with the dilemma of deceit In M. Lewis & C. Saarni (Eds.), LyingLying and deception in everyday life (pp. 126-147). New York: Guilford Press. DePaulo,, B. M., Kirkendol, S. E., Kashy, D. A., Wyer, M. M. & Epstein, J. A. (1996).

Lyingg in Everyday Life. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 979-995. Dee Vries, D. L. & Ajzen, I. (1971). The relationship of attitudes and normative beliefs to

cheatingg in college. The Journal of Social Psychology, 83, 199-207.

Drew,, P. (1984). Speakers' reportings in invitation sequences. In: J. M. Atkinson & J. Heritagee (Eds.). Structures of Social Action. Studies in Conversation Analysis. Cambridge,, Mas.: Cambridge University Press.

Ebescu,, A. S. & Miller, M. D. (1994). Verbal and Non-verbal Behaviors as a Function of Deceptionn Type. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 13, 418-442.

Edwards,, A. L. (1957). The social desirability variable in personality assessment and research.research. New York: Dryden Press.

Eggen,, T. J. H. M. & Sanders, P.F. (Red.) (1993). Psychometrie in de Praktijk. Arnhem: Citoo Instituut voor Toetsontwikkeling.

Ekman,, P. (1992). Telling Lies. (2nd. Edn.). New York: Norton.

Enker,, M. S. (1987) Attitudinal and normative variables as predictors of cheating behavior. JournalJournal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 18, 315-330.

Eysenck,, H.J. & Eysenck, S.B.G. (1964). The manual of Eysenck Personality Inventory. London:: University of London Press.

Feldman,, R. S. (1982). Development of non-verbal behavior in children. New York: Springer. .

Fienberg,, S. E. (1994). The Analysis of Cross-Classified Categorical Data. Cambridge, MA:: MIT Press.

(4)

Fogarty,, J. S. (1997). Reactance Theory and Patient Non-compliance. Social Science and Medicine,Medicine, 45, 8, 1277-1288.

Ford,, C. V. (1996). Lies! Lies!! Lies!!! The Psychology of Deceit. Washington, DC: Americann Psychiatric Press, Inc..

Grover,, S.L. (1997). Lying in organizations: Theory, research and future directions. In R.A.. Giaclione & J. Greenberg (Eds.), Antisocial Behaviour in organizations (pp. 68-84).. London: Sage.

Hartmann,, P. (1993). Controlling Response Bias by Social Desirability Scales. In Krebs & Schmidtt (Eds.), New Directions in Attitude Measurement, (pp. 338-349).

Hathaway,, S. R. & McKinley, J. C. (1943). Manual for the Minnesota Multiphasic PersonalityPersonality Inventory. New York: Psychological Cooperation.

Heuts,, L. (1997). Reacties op Dilemma's in de Werksituatie: Een Onderzoek naar Liegen onderr Docenten. Doctoraalwerkstuk, Faculteit der Psychologie, Vakgroep Arbeids-enn Organisatiepsychologie, Universiteit Van Amsterdam.

Hopper,, R. & Bell, R. A. (1982). Broadening the deception construct. Quarterly Journal of Speech,Speech, 70, 288-302.

Hyman,, R. (1989). The Psychology of Deception. Annual Review of Psychology, 40, 133-154. .

Kalbfleisch,, P. J. (1994). The Language of Detecting Deceit. Journal of Language and SocialSocial Psychology, 13, 497- 514.

Kashy,, D. A. & DePaulo, B. M. (1996). Who Lies? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,Psychology, 70,5, 1037-1051.

Keating,, C. F. & Heltman, K. R. (1994). Dominance and deception in children and adults: Aree leaders the best misleaders? Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 20, 312-321. .

Krahé,, B. (1990). Situation Cognition and Coherence in Personality. An individual-centredcentred approach. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Kuckartz,, U. (1995a). MAX for WINDOWS. Version 1.0+. User's Guide and Reference. Berlin:: Verein zur Förderung der Ökologie im Bildungsbereich e. V.

Kuckartz,, U. (1995b). MAX for WINDOWS Version 1.0+. Berlin: Verein zur Förderung derr Ökologie im Bildungsbereich e.V.

Lewis,, M. (1993). The development of Deception. In M. Lewis & C. Saarni (Eds.), Lying andand deception in everyday life (pp. 126-147). New York: Guilford Press.

(5)

References References

Lindskold,, S. & Walters, P. S. (1983). Categories for the acceptability of lies. The Journal ofof Social Psychology, 120, 129-136.

Lindskold,, S. & Han, G. (1986). Intent and the judgement of lies. The Journal of Social Psychology,Psychology, 126, 129-130.

Lippard,, E.P. (1988). "Ask me no questions, I'll tell you no lies". Western Journal of SpeechSpeech Communication, 52, 91-103.

Maier,, R. A. & Lavrakas, P. J. (1976). Lying behavior and the evaluation of lies. PerceptualPerceptual and Motor Skills, 42, 575-581.

Mason,, J. (1996). Qualitative Researching. London, UK: Sage.

McComack,, S. A. (1992). Information Manipulation Theory. Communication Monographs,Monographs, 59, 1-16.

Meerumm Terwogt-Kouwenhoven, K. (1992). Over misleiding. Nederlands Tijdschrift voor dede Psychologie, 47, 205-222.

Meerumm Terwogt-Kouwenhoven, K. (1993). Het verkeerde been. Over alledaagse vormen vanvan misleiding. Amsterdam: Boom.

Metts,, S. (1989). An exploratory investigation of deception in close relationships. Journal ofof Social and Personal Relationships, 6, 159-179.

Millar,, K. U. & Tesser, A. (1988). Deceptive Behavior in Social Relationships: A Consequencee of Violated Expectations. The Journal of Psychology, 122, 263-273. Miller,, L. C , Cody, M. J. & McLaughlin, M. L. (1994). Situations and Goals as

Fundamentall Constructs in Interpersonal Communication Research. In M. L. Knapp && G. R. Miller (Eds.), Handbook of Interpersonal Communication, (pp. 162-198). Beverlyy Hills, CA: Sage.

Miller,, G. R., deTurck, M. A. & Kalbfleisch, P. J. (1983). Self-monitoring, rehearsal, and deceptivee communication. Human Communication Research, 10, 97-117.

Miller,, G. R. & Stiff, J. B. (1993). Deceptive Communication. Newbury Park: Sage. Mokken,, R. J. (1971). A theory and procedure of scale analysis with applications in

politicalpolitical research. New York/Berlin: Walter Gruyter / Mouton.

Molenaar,, I. W. (1982). Mokken scaling revisited. Kwantitatieve Methoden, 3, 145-164. Molenaar,, I. W. (1996). Nonparametric models for polytomous responses. In R. J.

Mokken,, I. W. Molenaar, K. Sijtsma & W. H. Van Schuur (Samenstellers)

Niet-parametrischparametrisch Latente Trek Modellen. Literatuurbundel (pp. 58 - 80). Postdoctoraal Seminariumm 3 - 7 juni 1996, Universitaire Onderzoeksschool voor Psychometrie en

(6)

Hemker,, B. T., Sijtsma. K. & Molenaar, I. W. (1995). Selection of Unidimensional Scales Fromm a Multidimensional Item Bank in the Polytomous Mokken IRT Model. Applied PsychologicalPsychological Measurement, 19, 337-352.

Molenaar,, I.W., Debets, P., Sijtsma, K., Hemker, B.T. (1994). MSP a program for Mokken ScaleScale analysis for Polytomous Items. User's Manual, version 3.0. Groningen: ProGAMMA. .

Paulhus,, D. L. (1984). Two-Component Models of Socially Desirable Responding. JournalJournal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46, 3, 598-609.

Paulhus,, D. L. (1986). Self-Deception and Impression Management in test Responses. In A.. Angleiter & J. S. Wiggens (Eds.), Personality assessment via questionnaires: CurrentCurrent issues in theory and measurement (pp. 143-165). Berlin: Springer. Pearson,, P. R. & Francis. L. J. (1989). The Dual Nature of the Eysenckian Lie Scales: Are

Religiouss Adolescents more Truthful? Personality and Individual Differences, 10, 10,10, 1041-1048.

Pope,, W. R. & Forsyth, D. R. (1986). Judgements of deceptive communications: A multidimensionall analysis. Bulletin of the Psychonomie Society, 24, 453-436. Reis,, H. T., Lin, Y. C , Bennet, M. E. & Nezlek, J. B. (1993). Change and consistency in

sociall participation during early adulthood. Developmental Psychology, 29, 633-645. Riggio,, R. E. (1994). Epilogue: Where Are We Going, and How Do We Get There?

JournalJournal of Language and Social Psychology, 13,514-518.

Robinson,, W. P. (1996). Deceit, delusion, and detection. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Saxe,, L. (1991). Lying. Thoughts of an Applied Social Psychologist. American

Psychologist,Psychologist, 46, 409-415.

Seibold,, D. R., Cantrill, J. G. & Meyers, R. A. (1985). Communication and Interpersonal Influence.. In M. L. Knapp & G. R. Miller (Eds.), Handbook of Interpersonal Communication,Communication, (1st edition, pp. 551 -611). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage. Seibold,, D.R., Cantrill, J. G. & Meyers, R. A. (1994). Communication and Interpersonal

Influence.. In M. L. Knapp & G. R. Miller (Eds.), Handbook of Interpersonal Communication,Communication, (pp. 542 -588). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

Siegel,, S. & Castellan, N. J. (1988). Nonparametric Statistics for the Behavioral Sciences. Neww York: McGraw-Hill.

Suls,, J. & Wan, C. K. (1987). In Search of the False-Uniqueness Phenomenon: Fear and Estimatess of Social Consensus. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 211-217. .

(7)

References References

Tornqvist,, J. S., Anderson, D. E. & DePaulo, B. M. (in press). Deceiving. In W. P. Robinsonn & H. Giles (Eds.), Handbook of Language and Social Psychology, (2n edition).. Chester, UK: J. Wiley & Sons.

Vann Eenbergen, M. (1998). Het hoe en waarom van grote en kleine leugens. Een kwalitatievee en kwantitatieve benadering van verbale misleiding. Doctoraalwerkstuk, Faculteitt der Psychologie, Vakgroep Psychologische Methodenleer, Universiteit van Amsterdam. .

Vorst,, H. & Oosterveld, P. (1994). Impression Management en Self Deception Vragenlijst. Faculteitt der Psychologie, Vakgroep Psychologische Methodenleer, Universiteit vann Amsterdam.

Vrij,, A. (1998). De psychologie van de leugenaar. Liegen en voorgelogen worden op het werk,werk, in de rechtszaal en thuis. Lisse: Swets & Zeitlinger.

Wilde,, G. J. S. (1963). Neurotische Labiliteit, gemeten volgens de Vragenlijstmethode. Amsterdam:: Van Rossen.

Referenties

GERELATEERDE DOCUMENTEN

Chapter 6 describes how the electromagnetic calorimeter clusters are formed and matched to charged tracks and also shows how the electromagnetic calorimeter cluster energies and

Effectiveness of Interactive Game Bikes on Physical Activity Motivation among Parents and Young Children in the Home: A Pilot Study.‖ I am looking for families who would like to

The potential for any sort of therapeutic chloride transporter seems weak, however this new motif is a potent recognition element and the studies outlined in this thesis may

differences in the degree to which the children inquired about narrative text, and the text, the teacher's actions and the social context influenced the

By the Mycenaean period, textile production was already thousands of years old, but with urbanization and the consolidation of the power of the elites, it became a palatial

That film has yet to make an appearance, but in the time since my rediscovery of it, I have eagerly shared the story of Andrew Henry, the story of how I lost and found the book

promoting cultural exchange. In the later years of the settlement‘s life, Salvador Fidalgo closed off the settlement to the local First Nations, except for occasional visits by local

The analysis will be followed by analytic constructions with preceding adjectives in constructions that convey positive meanings (e.g. tidy little room) and end with