• No results found

Genetic basis of allochronic differentiation in the fall armyworm - 12862_2017_911_MOESM6_ESM

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "Genetic basis of allochronic differentiation in the fall armyworm - 12862_2017_911_MOESM6_ESM"

Copied!
2
0
0

Bezig met laden.... (Bekijk nu de volledige tekst)

Hele tekst

(1)

UvA-DARE is a service provided by the library of the University of Amsterdam (https://dare.uva.nl)

UvA-DARE (Digital Academic Repository)

Genetic basis of allochronic differentiation in the fall armyworm

Hänniger, S.; Dumas, P.; Schöfl, G.; Gebauer-Jung, S.; Vogel, H.; Unbehend, M.; Heckel, D.G.; Groot, A.T. DOI 10.1186/s12862-017-0911-5 Publication date 2017 Document Version Other version Published in BMC Evolutionary Biology Link to publication

Citation for published version (APA):

Hänniger, S., Dumas, P., Schöfl, G., Gebauer-Jung, S., Vogel, H., Unbehend, M., Heckel, D. G., & Groot, A. T. (2017). Genetic basis of allochronic differentiation in the fall armyworm. BMC Evolutionary Biology, 17, [68]. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12862-017-0911-5

General rights

It is not permitted to download or to forward/distribute the text or part of it without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), other than for strictly personal, individual use, unless the work is under an open content license (like Creative Commons).

Disclaimer/Complaints regulations

If you believe that digital publication of certain material infringes any of your rights or (privacy) interests, please let the Library know, stating your reasons. In case of a legitimate complaint, the Library will make the material inaccessible and/or remove it from the website. Please Ask the Library: https://uba.uva.nl/en/contact, or a letter to: Library of the University of Amsterdam, Secretariat, Singel 425, 1012 WP Amsterdam, The Netherlands. You will be contacted as soon as possible.

(2)

Additional file 6

Homologous chromosomes of S. frugiperda and B. mori.

Homology is indicated by framed numbers at the intersection of Bm and Sf chromosomes. Numbers at intersections correspond to numbers of individual Sf contigs that produced significant BLAST hits against the Bm chromosome. BLAST hits originating from both BCs were given preference. When no Bm chromosome was hit by contigs from both BCs, the highest number of individual hits was given preference. Orange field = BLAST hits produced by contigs originating from BC_A. Blue field = BLAST hits produced by contigs originating from BC_B. Green fields = BLAST hits produced by contigs originating from BC_A+B. Clock genes mapping to the Bm chromosomes are indicated in the second column. R2 and P-values of the Sf QTC are given in the two right columns.

R² BC_A +BC_B P BC_A +BC_B A B 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11* 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23* 24* 25 26 27 28 1 clk, cyc, per, pdp1 X X 2 28 29 4 1 1 0.077 0.014 3 lark, jet 1 23 11 4 1 3 1 3 1 1 2 2 3 4 4 tim 31 15 15 1 4 1 5 CK2α 9 9 17 1 1 1 1 1 1 6 30 10 11 2 0.082 0.01 7 19 25 8 8 15 1 2 6 4 1 1 1 2 9 16 3 6 3 1 0,5 0,5 10 14 16 1 1 13 1 1 1 1 11* 21 22 7 1 12 20 21 1 1 2 2 14 1 2 1 1 0.065 0.023 13 24 24 1 1 1 14 3 18 1 3 2 1 1 1 15 cry2, CK2β 23 7 17 1 1 1 16 4 2 6 1 1 17 cry1, dbt 17 20 2 3 2 1 1 5 4 16 1 1 2 2 18 sgg 13 14 1 4 1 1 19 8 8 2 1 1 1 13 1 1 1 1 1 20 5 5 2 1 2 6 1 2 2 9 1 21 26 12 1 1 1 2 1 2 8 22 cwo, CaMKII 6 6 4 1 8 23* 29 28 1 1 2 1 12 2 23* 12 13 2 24* 32 2 25 2 17 1 1 4 3 19 1 27 vri 25 27 1 1 2 1 7 0.191 0.0001 28 slimb 10 11 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 6 11 0,5 0,5 18 30 1 1 1 22 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 4 2 1 19 1 1 0,5 0,5 1,5 0,5 Bm chromosomes Sf chr. Bm chr. clock genes mapping to Bm chromosomes

Referenties

GERELATEERDE DOCUMENTEN

Given the fact that mutually unbiased bases seem to be a good choice if we use only two or d + 1 measurement settings, it may be tempting to conclude that choosing our measurements

It is not permitted to download or to forward/distribute the text or part of it without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), other than for strictly

In particular, as we explain in more detail in Chapter 8 we see that the question of how much post-measurement information is required is the same as the following: given a set

Liang and Doherty [LD07] have shown how to ob- tain lower and upper bounds on the optimal strategy achievable using a fixed quantum state using semidefinite programming

In particular, we are given the probabilities Pr[a −j |s −j ] that the remaining players obtain outcomes a −j for their measurement settings s −j , as well as the value of

In particular, we show that a two-prover one-round interactive proof system where the verifier computes the XOR of two binary answers and the provers are allowed to share an

It is not permitted to download or to forward/distribute the text or part of it without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), other than for strictly

First, we introduce a framework for the classification of bit string commit- ments in terms of the length n of the string, Alice’s ability to cheat on at most a bits and Bob’s ability