• No results found

Optimising diagnosis and treatment of coagulopathy in severely injured trauma patients - Chapter 6: Is hypothermia at ICU admission an independent predictor of 28-days mortality?

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "Optimising diagnosis and treatment of coagulopathy in severely injured trauma patients - Chapter 6: Is hypothermia at ICU admission an independent predictor of 28-days mortality?"

Copied!
16
0
0

Bezig met laden.... (Bekijk nu de volledige tekst)

Hele tekst

(1)

UvA-DARE is a service provided by the library of the University of Amsterdam (https://dare.uva.nl)

Optimising diagnosis and treatment of coagulopathy in severely injured trauma

patients

Balvers, K.

Publication date

2016

Document Version

Final published version

Link to publication

Citation for published version (APA):

Balvers, K. (2016). Optimising diagnosis and treatment of coagulopathy in severely injured

trauma patients.

General rights

It is not permitted to download or to forward/distribute the text or part of it without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), other than for strictly personal, individual use, unless the work is under an open content license (like Creative Commons).

Disclaimer/Complaints regulations

If you believe that digital publication of certain material infringes any of your rights or (privacy) interests, please let the Library know, stating your reasons. In case of a legitimate complaint, the Library will make the material inaccessible and/or remove it from the website. Please Ask the Library: https://uba.uva.nl/en/contact, or a letter to: Library of the University of Amsterdam, Secretariat, Singel 425, 1012 WP Amsterdam, The Netherlands. You will be contacted as soon as possible.

(2)

K. Balvers, M. van der Horst, M. Graumans, C. Boer, J.M. Binnekade, J.C. Goslings, N.P. Juffermans Journal of Emergencies, Trauma and Shock 2016

HYPOTHERMIA AS A PREDICTOR FOR MORTALITY

IN TRAUMA PATIENTS AT ADMITTANCE TO THE

INTENSIVE CARE UNIT

(3)

ABSTRACT

Introduction: To study the impact of hypothermia upon admission to the Intensive Care Unit (ICU) on early and late mortality and to develop a prediction model for late mortality in severely injured trauma patients.

Methods: A multicenter retrospective cohort study was performed in adult trauma patients admitted to the ICU of two Level-1 trauma centers between 2007 and 2012. Hypothermia was defined as a core body temperature of ≤35° Celsius. Logistic regression analyses were performed to quantify the effect of hypothermia on 24-hour and 28-day mortality and to develop a prediction model.

Results: A total of 953 patients were included, of which 354 patients had hypothermia (37%) upon ICU admission. Patients were divided into a normothermic or hypothermic group. Hypothermia was associated with a significantly increased mortality at 24 hours and 28 days (OR 2.72 (1.18-6.29 and OR 2.82 (1.83-4.35) resp.). The variables included in the final prediction model were hypothermia, age, APACHE II score (corrected for temperature), INR, platelet count, traumatic brain injury and Injury Severity Score. The final prediction model discriminated between survivors and non-survivors with high accuracy (AUC=0.871, 95% CI 0.844-0.898).

Conclusion: Hypothermia, defined as a temperature ≤35° Celsius, is common in critically ill trauma patients and is one of the most important physiological predictors for early and late mortality in trauma patients. Trauma patients admitted to the ICU may be at high risk for late mortality if the patient is hypothermic, coagulopathic, severely injured and has traumatic brain injury or an advanced age.

(4)

INTRODUCTION

Accidental hypothermia on the Emergency Department (ED) is frequently observed in trauma patients and is associated with poor outcomes1-8, although not all studies

provided consistent results9;1. Hypothermia in trauma patients is generally defined as a

core body temperature of ≤35° C11. The association with early mortality4-8;12 is thought

to occur via deterioration of coagulation abilities13, as hypothermia causes a decreased

function of clotting factors and an impaired platelet function14 and is associated with

increased blood loss and the transfusion of more blood products4;15.

Between time of arrival on the ED and Intensive Care Unit (ICU) admission, stabilization efforts with trauma resuscitation, medication, coiling and damage control surgery may all influence temperature and subsequently may reverse accidental hypothermia. The impact of hypothermia present upon ICU admission on mortality occurring after stabilization efforts is not known. Of note, the occurrence of ‘indoor’ hypothermia was found to be associated with worse outcome than “outdoor” hypothermia in a small study in a medical ICU population16. Transient hypothermia might have a different

etiology and outcome compared to persistent hypothermia or hypothermia which occurs during hospital stay. Furthermore, well known prediction models for mortality in trauma patients admitted to the ICU were developed in a non-trauma population or in non-intubated patients, which renders these models less suitable as prediction models for mortality in critically ill trauma patients17-19. Therefore, this study had 2 aims: first

to study the incidence and impact of hypothermia on admission to the ICU on early and late mortality, controlling for variables that are associated with trauma-related mortality. Second, to develop a prediction model for late mortality in critically ill trauma patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS

Study design

This study was a multicentre retrospective cohort study of adult trauma patients admitted to the ED and subsequently transferred to the ICU of two Level 1-trauma centres in Amsterdam, the Netherlands. Patients were recruited between January 2007 and December 2012. All adult trauma patients who were admitted to the ICU and with core temperature measurements available upon ICU admission were eligible. The Institutional Review Board approved the study and waived the need for informed consent.

(5)

Data collection

Data on patient demographics, baseline vitals on ICU admission, injury severity as classified by the Injury Severity Score (ISS), laboratory tests, temperature on ICU admission, NICE score, ICU length of stay, 24-hour and 28-day mortality were collected retrospectively. Demographic data and measures of severity of illness were obtained from the NICE (National Intensive Care Evaluation) database and the electronic patient data management system. The NICE database contains continuous and complete recordings of patients demographics, vital signs, treatment and outcome data of patients who were admitted to the ICU in order to contribute to the quality of Intensive Care Medicine in the Netherlands20. Additionally, all participants of the NICE database are trained in

collecting data accurately according to clear defined definitions (www.stichting-nice.nl). The ISS was obtained from the ED registry. Hypothermia was measured by nasopharynx or rectal thermistor temperature probes. Only temperature measurements which were validated by nurses were taken into account for analysis.

Hypothermia was defined as a core temperature of ≤35° C on ICU admission11.

Management of hypothermia on the ICU consisted of a warm environment, blankets and active movement (if possible) if the temperature was between 32-35° Celsius. A temperature between 28-32 ° Celsius was managed by a bear hugger and warming of parenteral fluids using a fluido. Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation and cardiopulmonary bypass were added when patients had a temperature below 32° Celsius.

The primary outcome of this study was the mortality rate at 24 hours and 28 days.

Statistical analysis

Patients were categorized into a normothermic or hypothermic group. Continuous normally distributed variables are expressed by their mean and standard deviation or when not normally distributed as median and their interquartile ranges. Categorical variables are expressed as n (%). To test group differences, the Students t-test was used, if continuous data are not normally distributed the Mann-Whitney U test was used. Categorical variables are compared with the Chi-square test.

Automatically multiple imputation by logistic regression of data was performed in order to handle missing values, with the exception of missing outcome variables. Reference distribution in the imputated dataset was set equal to the original dataset. Data are represented as pooled values of 10 imputations. The goal of the primary analysis (logistic regression) was to quantify the net effect of hypothermia at admission to the ICU on 24-hour and 28-day mortality, controlling for variables associated with

(6)

trauma-6

related mortality. Confounders were identified with univariable logistic regression models. Variables included in the univariable logistic regression models were: gender, age, weight, height, traumatic brain injury, ISS, Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) score corrected for temperature, mean arterial pressure (MAP), haemoglobin (Hb), pH, the total amount of blood products administered and platelet count. Furthermore, interaction terms were added to the logistic regression models to evaluate if hypothermia was a result of the injury mechanism (ISS, presence of head injury) or of resuscitation (the amount of allogeneic blood products transfused). Variables that are part of the APACHE II score were excluded to avoid redundancy in the analysis. Categorization of continuous potential confounders was used to examine linearity between these confounders and 24-hour and 28-day mortality. Square terms or log transformations were used to correct for non-linearity. A p-value of ≤0.2 in the univariable logistic regression models was considered as a relevant confounding effect. Variables with a relevant confounding effect were included in the multivariable logistic regression models as predictors for 24-hour and 28-day mortality by using backward selection. Only those variables with a significant association with mortality after backward selection were included in the final multivariable logistic regression models. A p-value of 0.05 was used as cut-off value for backward selection.

The final logistic regression model for 28-day mortality was used as a prediction model and to generate a formula to predict 28-day mortality. In this formula ß-coefficients of the logistic regression model were used to develop a weighted point system. The Area Under the Curve (AUC) of the Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve was used to evaluate the discrimination of the final model, the Hosmer-Lemeshow statistic was used to define goodness-of-fit of the model.

Statistical significance is considered to be p <0.05. Appropriate statistical uncertainty was expressed by the 95% confidence levels. Analysis was performed with SPSS Statistics 21 (IBM, Chicago, IL, USA). Methods and results were reported according to the “transparent reporting of a multivariable prediction model for individual prognosis or diagnosis” (TRIPOD) statement21.

RESULTS

Of a total of 953 patients admitted to the ICU, 354 (37%) patients had hypothermia. Table 1 describes the different demographic characteristics of the cohort for the hypothermic and normothermic group. The majority of the patient characteristics were different between both groups. The hypothermic group was more severely injured, coagulopathic, acidotic and had higher mortality rates. Almost 50% of the patients

(7)

who died within 28 days had a core body temperature lower than 32 °C on admission to the ICU.

Hypothermia and mortality

Of the patients with hypothermia, 29 (8%) patients died within 24 hours and 101 patients (57%) within 28 days. The mortality rate in normothermic patients was significantly lower, 11 (2%) and 57 (10%, p<0.001). The APACHE score II score corrected for temperature, MAP, traumatic brain injury were identified as relevant confounders for 24-hour mortality, whereas the APACHE score II score corrected for temperature, MAP, traumatic brain injury, ISS, age and platelet count were identified as confounding variables for 28-day mortality. After adjustment for these confounders, was hypothermia on arrival to the ICU associated with an increased 24-hour mortality (OR 2.72, 95% CI 1.18-6.29) and an increased 28-day mortality (OR 2.82, 95% CI 1.83-4.35). Thereby, was hypothermia one of the most important physiological predictors for both 24-hour and 28-day mortality (Table 2 and 3). Of note, the interaction terms (hypothermia x ISS, hypothermia x TBI and hypothermia x transfusion) were not statistically significant in the multivariable logistic regression models and were therefore excluded.

Prediction model for late mortality

The final logistic regression model for 28-day mortality was used as prediction model and to generate a formula to predict 28-day mortality. Besides hypothermia, traumatic

TABLE 1: Patient characteristics

Normothermia

(n=599) Hypothermia (n= 354) p-value

Gender, male % (n/N) 487 (81) 266 (75) 0.026 Age, years, median (IQR) 44 (29-60) 46 (30-65) 0.242 MAP, mmHg, mean (SD) 88 (16) 84 (15) <0.001 Hb, mmol/L, mean (SD) 6.2 (1.3) 6.0 (1.5) 0.011 pH, mean (SD) 7.36 (0.08) 7.32 (0.11) <0.001 INR, median (IQR) 1.14 (1.0-1.4) 1.24 (1.1-1.6) <0.001 Platelet count x109/L, mean (SD) 193 (117) 147 (79) <0.001 Injury severity score, mean (SD) 24 (12) 28 (14) <0.001 APACHE II score, mean (SD) 16 (7) 20 (9) <0.001 Total blood products transfused, units, mean (SD) 1 (4) 3 (11) <0.001 Traumatic brain injury, n (%) 130 (22) 98 (28) 0.041 ICU LOS, days, median (IQR) 2 (1-5) 2 (1-6) 0.330 24-hour mortality, n (%) 11 (2) 29 (8) <0.001 28-day mortality, n (%) 57 (10) 101 (29) <0.001 Hb=haemoglobin, MAP=mean arterial pressure, ICU LOS= Intensive Care Unit length of stay

(8)

6

brain injury, INR, APACHE II score corrected for temperature, age, ISS and platelet count were included as predictors in the prediction model. The formula generated to predict 28-day mortality is shown in Box 1. The final prediction model discriminated between survivors and non-survivors with high accuracy (AUC 0.871, 95% CI 0.844-0.898). The calibration of the model was good, which was reflected by the Hosmer-Lemeshow test of the different imputation sets, which ranged between 0.081 until 0.912 with a mean p of 0.556. This indicates that there is no significant difference between the observed and predicted outcome of the developed model.

TABLE 2: Multivariable logistic regression model for 24-hour mortality

24-hour mortality OR (95% CI)

p-value

Traumatic Brain Injury, Yes=1, No=0 2.93 (1.34-6.36) 0.007 APACHE II score corrected1 1.08 (1.04-1.13) 0.001 MAP 24 hours, mmHg 0.92 (0.90-0.95) <0.001 Hypothermia ≤35° Celsius 2.72 (1.18-6.29) 0.019 MAP=mean arterial pressure

1APACHE II classifies temperature as: temp 36°- 38.4° = 0 points, 34 – 35.9 = +1; 32 – 33.9 = +2; 30 -

31.9 = +3; ≤ 29.9 = +4; APACHE II score was corrected for temperature.

TABLE 3: Multivariable logistic regression model for 28-day mortality

28-day mortality OR (95% CI)

p-value

Traumatic Brain Injury, Yes=1, No=0 3.17 (2.00-5.03) <0.001 Hypothermia ≤35° Celsius 2.82 (1.83-4.35) <0.001

INR 1.33 (1.06-1.68) 0.015

APACHE II score corrected1 1.09 (1.06-1.12) <0.001

Age, years 1.03 (1.02-1.05) <0.001 Injury Severity Score 1.03 (1.01-1.04) 0.003 Platelet count x109 g/L 1.00 (0.99-1.00) 0.046 Hb=haemoglobin, MAP=mean arterial pressure

1APACHE II classifies temperature as: temp 36° - 38.4° = 0 points, 34 – 35.9 = +1; 32 – 33.9 = +2; 30 -

31.9 = +3; ≤ 29.9 = +4; APACHE II score was corrected for points from temperature.

BOX 1: Formula for predicted risk of 28-day mortality

Formula for predicted risk of mortality= 1/(1+e^(-(-6.547 + 1.036 (if body temperature ≤35° Celsius) +

0.087 * APACHE II score corrected for temperature - 0.003 * platelet count (x 109) + 0.033 * age + 0.025 * ISS + 0.287 * INR + 1.153 (if TBI=yes).

(9)

DISCUSSION

This study shows that upon ICU admission following trauma, hypothermia is frequently present and is one of the most important physiological predictors for both early and late mortality in trauma patients. Other predictors for late mortality are age, APACHE II score corrected for temperature, INR, platelet count 109/L, traumatic brain injury and ISS. A prediction model, which combines these independent predictors, may be able to identify trauma patients at high risk for late mortality on ICU admission.

Hypothermia

The present study found that hypothermia on ICU admission is common in trauma patients. More than one third of the critically ill trauma patients in this study had hypothermia on arrival at the ICU. Similar results are found in studies investigating the incidence of hypothermia on the ED5;10. These findings suggest that therapy on

the ED may not be focused on prevention or correction of hypothermia. Obviously, the focus of therapy in severely injured patients is on efforts to stop the bleeding and to protect the patient from further injury by failure of oxygenation of vital signs or central nervous system, which requires multiple actions and interventions. Hypothermia may aggravate bleeding and therefore management of body temperature is part of trauma management protocols22. However, body core temperature is collected in 30%

-60%6;23;24 of the trauma patients upon admission to the ED. Thereby, screening of body

core temperature may be regarded as less important in the care of trauma patients. An alternative explanation for the high incidence of hypothermia upon ICU admission may be that it is not feasible to correct core body temperature, as interventions may require that the patient is (partly) uncovered and that treatment and surgical procedures may further cool the patient25, even when devices with warm resuscitation fluids or other

rewarming techniques are applied.

Hypothermia and mortality

We have, in contrast to previous studies, examined accidental hypothermia upon admission to the ICU instead of on admission to the ED. The effect of accidental hypothermia at ICU admission on mortality is less well documented, and may be influenced by stabilization efforts during trauma resuscitation. Therefore the clinical significance of hypothermia may be different between these two time points. We found that hypothermia on ICU admission was associated with an increased mortality. This is in line with the results of two previous studies26;27]. Furthermore, we observed

that hypothermia was more frequently observed in patients with TBI and in transfused patients, which suggests that hypothermia is merely a result of the injury severity, traumatic brain injury or transfusion of blood products than an independent predictor

(10)

6

for mortality, provoked by massive blood loss and transfusion or by an impaired thermoregulation system due to traumatic brain injury, also known as the lethal triad. However, in our logistic regression models, TBI and transfusion did not interact with hypothermia, which suggests that hypothermia is an independent predictor for mortality and not a result of traumatic brain injury, blood loss or injury severity. Hypothermia may be a result of interventions which require that the patient is (partly) uncovered and by treatment and surgical procedures which may further cool the patient25. Aggressive

prevention or correction of the body temperature by rewarming techniques could potentially influence the incidence of hypothermia on ICU admission and subsequently mortality. However, studies investigating the effectiveness of these rewarming devices are limited28;29. Further research in this field is therefore required.

Prediction model for late mortality

The results of this study identified coagulopathy, the severity of injury, the age of patients and traumatic brain injury as other predictors for late mortality in trauma patients admitted to the ICU. These findings are in line with results of previous studies4;14;15;26.

However, a prediction model for late mortality in trauma patients upon admittance to the ICU has not been developed previously. Well known prediction models for mortality in trauma patients are the APACHE II score18 and the TRISS (Trauma and Injury

Severity score)17. The APACHE II score was developed in a non-trauma population and

included no anatomical component, which reduces the ability to predict mortality in trauma patients19. The TRISS is a model to predict mortality in trauma patients based

on predictors available on the ED like age, trauma mechanism and an estimated ISS. A disadvantage of the TRISS is the exclusion of intubated patients, which renders the TRISS not suitable as prediction model for mortality in critically ill patients. The prediction model developed in this study contains physiological and anatomical parameters and may be a promising tool for predicting mortality in trauma patients on arrival to the ICU. However, external validation of the developed model is still required. Therefore prospective studies are warranted to confirm the accuracy of the developed prediction model. .

Limitations to this study should be acknowledged. Data on surgical procedures, core body temperature upon admission to the ED and time between arrival on the ED and the ICU were not available. Furthermore, the retrospective design of this study does not control for all possible confounders. Additionally, temperature measurements were done at different sites, (rectum and nasopharynx) which lag behind changes in oesophageal temperature which is the gold standard for core temperature.

(11)

CONCLUSION

In conclusion, hypothermia, defined as a temperature ≤35°C, is common in trauma patients upon ICU admission and is associated with increased mortality. Hypothermic trauma patients admitted to the ICU may be at high risk for late mortality if the patient is also coagulopathic, severely injured, has traumatic brain injury or an advanced age.

(12)
(13)

REFERENCES 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 Reynolds BR, Forsythe RM, Harbrecht BG, Cuschieri J, Minei JP, Maier RV, Moore EE, Billiar EE, Peitzman AB, Sperry JL. Hypothermia in massive transfusion: have we been paying enough attention to it? J Trauma Acute Care Surg.2012;73:486-91.

Beilman GJ, Blondet JJ, Nelson TR, Nathens AB, Moore FA, Rhee P, Puyana JC, Moore EE, Cohn SM. Early hypothermia in severely injured trauma patients is a significant risk factor for multiple organ dysfunction syndrome but not mortality. Ann Surg.2009;249:845-50. Rubiano AM, Sanchez AI, Estebanez G, Peitzman A, Sperry J, Puyana JC. The effect of admission spontaneous hypothermia on patients with severe traumatic brain injury. Injury.2013;44:1219-25.

Bukur M, Hadjibashi AA, Ley EJ, Malinoski D, Singer M, Barmparas G, Margulies D, Salim A. Impact of prehospital hypothermia on transfusion requirements and outcomes. J Trauma Acute Care Surg.2012;73:1195-201. Ireland S, Endacott R, Cameron P, Fitzgerald M, Paul E. The incidence and significance of accidental hypothermia in major trauma--a prospective observational study. Resuscitation.2011;82:300-6.

Martin RS, Kilgo PD, Miller PR, Hoth JJ, Meredith JW, Chang MC. Injury-associated hypothermia: an analysis of the 2004 National Trauma Data Bank. Shock.2005;24:114-8. Shafi S, Elliott AC, Gentilello L. Is hypothermia simply a marker of shock and injury severity or an independent risk factor for mortality in trauma patients? Analysis of a large national trauma registry. J Trauma.2005;59:1081-5. Wang HE, Callaway CW, Peitzman AB, Tisherman SA. Admission hypothermia and outcome after major trauma. Crit Care Med.2005;33:1296-301.

van der Ploeg GJ, Goslings JC, Walpoth BH, Bierens JJ. Accidental hypothermia: rewarming treatments, complications and outcomes from one university medical centre.

Resuscitation.2010;81:1550-5.

Mommsen P, Andruszkow H, Fromke C, Zeckey C, Wagner U, van GM, Frink M, Krettek C, Hildebrand F. Effects of accidental hypothermia on posttraumatic complications and outcome in multiple trauma patients. Injury.2013;44:86-90.

Soar J, Perkins GD, Abbas G, Alfonzo A, Barelli A, Bierens JJ, Brugger H, Deakin CD, Dunning J, Georgiou M, Handley AJ, Lockey DJ, Paal P, Sandroni C, Thies KC, Zideman DA, Nolan JP. European Resuscitation Council Guidelines for Resuscitation 2010 Section 8. Cardiac arrest in special circumstances: Electrolyte abnormalities, poisoning, drowning, accidental hypothermia, hyperthermia, asthma, anaphylaxis, cardiac surgery, trauma, pregnancy, electrocution. Resuscitation.2010;81:1400-33.

Hildebrand F, Giannoudis PV, van GM, Chawda M, Pape HC. Pathophysiologic changes and effects of hypothermia on outcome in elective surgery and trauma patients. Am J Surg.2004;187:363-71.

Mikhail J. The trauma triad of death: hypothermia, acidosis, and coagulopathy. AACN Clin Issues.1999;10:85-94.

Zhang JN, Wood J, Bergeron AL, McBride L, Ball C, Yu Q, Pusiteri AE, Holcomb JB, Dong JF. Effects of low temperature on shear-induced platelet aggregation and activation. J Trauma.2004;57:216-23.

Rajagopalan S, Mascha E, Na J, Sessler DI. The effects of mild perioperative hypothermia on blood loss and transfusion requirement. Anesthesiology.2008;108:71-7.

Megarbane B, Axler O, Chary I, Pompier R, Brivet FG. Hypothermia with indoor occurrence is associated with a worse outcome. Intensive Care Med.2000;26:1843-9.

Boyd CR, Tolson MA, Copes WS. Evaluating trauma care: the TRISS method. Trauma Score and the Injury Severity Score. J Trauma.1987;27:370-8.

(14)

REFERENCES 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 Knaus WA, Draper EA, Wagner DP, Zimmerman JE. APACHE II: a severity of disease classification system. Crit Care Med.1985;13:818-29.

McAnena OJ, Moore FA, Moore EE, Mattox KL, Marx JA, Pepe P. Invalidation of the APACHE II scoring system for patients with acute trauma. J Trauma.1992;33:504-6.

Arts D, de KN, Scheffer GJ, de JE. Quality of data collected for severity of illness scores in the Dutch National Intensive Care Evaluation (NICE) registry. Intensive Care Med.2002;28:656-9.

Collins G, Reitsma J, Altman D, Moons K. Transparent Reporting of a Multivariable Prediction Model for Individual Prognosis or Diagnosis (TRIPOD): the TRIPOD statement. BJOG.2015;122:434-43.

American College of Surgeons Committee on Trauma. Advanced Trauma Life Support; Student Course Manual. 9th ed. Chicago: 2012.

Trentzsch H, Huber-Wagner S, Hildebrand F, Kanz KG, Faist E, Piltz S, Lefering R. Hypothermia for prediction of death in severely injured blunt trauma patients. Shock.2012;37:131-9.

Langhelle A, Lockey D, Harris T, Davies G. Body temperature of trauma patients on admission to hospital: a comparison of anaesthetised and non-anaesthetised patients. Emerg Med J.2012;29:239-42.

Hirshberg A, Sheffer N, Barnea O. Computer simulation of hypothermia during “damage control” laparotomy. World J Surg.1999;23:960-5.

Konstantinidis A, Inaba K, Dubose J, Barmparas G, Talving P, David JS, Lam L, Demetriades D. The impact of nontherapeutic hypothermia on outcomes after severe traumatic brain injury. J Trauma.2011;71:1627-31.

Rutherford EJ, Fusco MA, Nunn CR, Bass JG, Eddy VA, Morris JA, Jr. Hypothermia in critically ill trauma patients. Injury.1998;29:605-8.

Steele MT, Nelson MJ, Sessler DI, Fraker L, Bunney B, Watson WA, Robinson WA. Forced air speeds rewarming in accidental hypothermia. Ann Emerg Med.1996;27:479-84.

Gentilello LM, Jurkovich GJ, Stark MS, Hassantash SA, O’Keefe GE. Is hypothermia in the victim of major trauma protective or harmful? A randomized, prospective study. Ann Surg.1997;226:439-47.

(15)

APPENDIX

TABLE 1: Univariable logistic regression for 24-hour mortality

24-hour mortality

OR (95% CI) p-value

Gender, female = 0, Male = 1 1.26 (0.60-2.65) 0.539 Age, years 1.02 (1.00-1.03) 0.034 Squared height, cm 1.00 (1.00-1.00) 0.177 Squared weight, kg 1.00 (1.00-1.00) 0.286 Traumatic Brain Injury, Yes=1, No=0 5.75 (2.97-11.15) <0.001 Injury Severity Score 1.04 (1.02-1.07) <0.001 APACHE II score corrected1 1.13 (1.09-1.17) <0.001

MAP 24 hours, mmHg 0.91 (0.98-0.94) <0.001 Hb, mmol/L 0.78 (0.59-1.04) 0.089

pH 0.00 (0.00-0.02) <0.001

INR 1.57 (1.29-1.92) <0.001

Platelet count, x 109/L 0.10 (0.99-1.00) 0.177

Blood products, units 0.10 (0.94-1.05) 0.856 Hypothermia ≤35° Celsius 4.93 (2.33-10.41) <0.001

Centre 0.52 (0.21-1.26) 0.147

ISS x Hypothermia ≤35° Celsius 1.04 (1.03-1.06) <0.001 TBI x Hypothermia ≤35° Celsius 11.70 (5.97-22.93) <0.001 Blood products x Hypothermia ≤35° Celsius 1.01 (0.97-1.05) 0.681 BE mEqL, mean (SD) -10.3 (7.2) -5.7 (5.1) Hb=hemoglobin, MAP=mean arterial pressure

1APACHE II classifies temperature as: temp 36° - 38.4° = 0 points, 34 – 35.9 = +1; 32 – 33.9 = +2; 30 -

(16)

6

TABLE 2: Univariable logistic regression for 28-day mortality

28-day mortality

OR (95% CI) p-value

Gender, female = 0, Male = 1 2.18 (1.48-3.22) <0.001 Age, years 1.04 (1.03-1.05) <0.001 Squared height, cm 1.00 (1.00-1.00) <0.001 Squared weight, kg 1.00 (1.00-1.00) 0.751 Traumatic Brain Injury, Yes=1, No=0 4.19 (2.93-6.00) <0.001 Injury Severity Score 1.04 (1.02-1.05) <0.001 APACHE II score corrected1 1.16 (1.13-1.19) <0.001

MAP 24 hours, mmHg 0.98 (0.97-0.99) <0.001 Hb, mmol/L 0.72 (0.63-0.83) <0.001

pH 0.01 (0.00-0.03) <0.001

INR 1.68 (1.35-2.09) <0.001

Platelet count, x 109/L 0.10 (0.99-1.00) <0.001

Blood products, units 1.03 (1.01-1.05) 0.007 Hypothermia ≤35° Celsius 3.66 (2.56-5.22) <0.001

Centre 0.73 (0.48-1.11) 0.143

ISS x Hypothermia ≤35° Celsius 1.04 (1.03-1.05) <0.001 TBI x Hypothermia ≤35° Celsius 6.78 (4.35-10.59) <0.001 Blood products x Hypothermia ≤35° Celsius 1.05 (1.02-1.08) 0.002 Hb=hemoglobin, MAP=mean arterial pressure

1APACHE II classifies temperature as: temp 36° - 38.4° = 0 points, 34 – 35.9 = +1; 32 – 33.9 = +2; 30 -

Referenties

GERELATEERDE DOCUMENTEN

We examine two hypotheses implied by the theory: one, for any three players with two links present, the probability of a third link being present is increasing in the strength of

Rhodium Catalyzed Hydroformylation of Higher Alkenes using Amphiphilic Ligands.. Buhling, A.; Kamer, P.C.J.; van

Hence, an original owner is protected increasingly more in France, Germany, and the United States, and a natural metrics of her/his property rights on a movable good is the number

Thiss thesis focuses on the factors that are involved in the import of peroxisomall proteins in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae (baker's yeast). The peroxisomall protein

It is not permitted to download or to forward/distribute the text or part of it without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), other than for strictly

If you believe that digital publication of certain material infringes any of your rights or (privacy) interests, please let the Library know, stating your reasons.. In case of

Chapterr 2 Saccharomyces cerevisiae PTS1 receptor Pex5p interacts with 53 thee SH3 domain of the peroxisomal membrane protein. Pexl3pp in an unconventional, non-PXXP-related manner

Feedback by e-mail (sent on average once a week): - Daily step count for the last 7 days. - Daily number of stairs taken for the last