• No results found

Radiating top quarks - Contents

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "Radiating top quarks - Contents"

Copied!
4
0
0

Bezig met laden.... (Bekijk nu de volledige tekst)

Hele tekst

(1)

UvA-DARE is a service provided by the library of the University of Amsterdam (https://dare.uva.nl)

UvA-DARE (Digital Academic Repository)

Radiating top quarks

Gosselink, M.

Publication date 2010

Link to publication

Citation for published version (APA):

Gosselink, M. (2010). Radiating top quarks.

http://www.nikhef.nl/pub/services/biblio/theses_pdf/thesis_M_Gosselink.pdf

General rights

It is not permitted to download or to forward/distribute the text or part of it without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), other than for strictly personal, individual use, unless the work is under an open content license (like Creative Commons).

Disclaimer/Complaints regulations

If you believe that digital publication of certain material infringes any of your rights or (privacy) interests, please let the Library know, stating your reasons. In case of a legitimate complaint, the Library will make the material inaccessible and/or remove it from the website. Please Ask the Library: https://uba.uva.nl/en/contact, or a letter to: Library of the University of Amsterdam, Secretariat, Singel 425, 1012 WP Amsterdam, The Netherlands. You will be contacted as soon as possible.

(2)

Contents

Introduction 1

1 Top quark physics 5

1.1 Physics at the LHC . . . 5

1.2 Understanding the top quark . . . 9

1.2.1 Mass . . . 9

1.2.2 Decay . . . 10

1.2.3 Pair production . . . 11

1.2.4 Single top production . . . 18

1.3 Top quarks at the LHC . . . 19

1.3.1 Parton distribution functions . . . 19

1.3.2 Top quark mass and the Higgs boson . . . 21

1.3.3 Non-Standard Model top decays and t¯t resonances . . . 22

1.3.4 Pair production with additional jets . . . 23

2 Monte Carlo generators 25 2.1 Generator overview . . . 25

2.1.1 Hard scattering . . . 27

2.1.2 Parton showers . . . 28

2.1.3 Hadronisation and decay . . . 32

2.1.4 Underlying event . . . 33

2.2 Combining partons showers with matrix elements . . . 35

2.2.1 Matrix element correction for the parton shower . . . 35

2.2.2 Matching the parton shower with NLO matrix elements . . . 36

2.2.3 Merging the parton shower with tree-level matrix elements . . . . 38

2.2.4 Comparisons . . . 44

2.3 Conclusions . . . 47

(3)

Contents

3 Detection of top quarks in ATLAS 49

3.1 The ATLAS detector . . . 50

3.1.1 Inner detector . . . 50

3.1.2 Calorimeters . . . 53

3.1.3 Muon spectrometer . . . 58

3.1.4 Trigger system . . . 60

3.2 Jet reconstruction . . . 61

3.2.1 Input to jet reconstruction . . . 61

3.2.2 Jet clustering algorithms . . . 63

3.2.3 Jet calibration . . . 66

3.2.4 Jet reconstruction performance . . . 68

3.3 The typical t¯t event . . . 70

4 Production of W + jets, t¯t, and t¯tH 73 4.1 Momentum fractions . . . 73

4.2 Reconstruction of x1 and x2 . . . 75

4.2.1 Neutrino momentum . . . 75

4.2.2 Jets and acceptance . . . 75

4.2.3 Jet multiplicity . . . 78

4.2.4 Hadronic W± boson events . . . . 79

4.3 Conclusions . . . 80

5 Cross section at √s = 14 TeV 81 5.1 Event topology . . . 82 5.2 Object definitions . . . 84 5.3 Event selection . . . 85 5.3.1 Trigger . . . 85 5.3.2 Preselection . . . 85 5.3.3 Selection efficiencies . . . 86 5.4 Top reconstruction . . . 87

5.4.1 Hadronic top quark mass . . . 87

5.5 Cross section determination . . . 91

5.6 Statistical and systematic uncertainties . . . 92

5.6.1 Luminosity . . . 92

5.6.2 Parton density functions . . . 93

5.6.3 Lepton identification and trigger efficiencies . . . 94

5.6.4 Initial and final state radiation . . . 94

5.6.5 Fit uncertainties . . . 95

5.6.6 Jet energy scale . . . 95

5.6.7 Amount of background . . . 97

5.7 Results and conclusions . . . 97

(4)

Contents

6 Top quark pairs with additional jets 99

6.1 Event selection . . . 99

6.1.1 QCD multi-jet background . . . 99

6.1.2 Including b-tagging . . . 101

6.2 Jet multiplicity . . . 104

6.2.1 Jet spectrum . . . 105

6.2.2 Fast versus full simulation . . . 107

6.2.3 Event generator comparison . . . 108

6.3 t¯t cross section measurement . . . 109

6.3.1 Event selection . . . 109

6.3.2 Mass reconstruction . . . 109

6.4 Conclusions and discussion . . . 112

7 W± and Z boson production 115 7.1 Comparison . . . 115

7.2 Cross sections . . . 116

7.3 W± and Z boson spectra . . . 118

7.4 Jet spectra . . . 120

7.5 Ratio of W + jets and Z + jets events . . . 123

7.6 Underlying event . . . 125

7.7 Background from W + jets in t¯t event selection . . . 128

7.8 Conclusions & Discussion . . . 131

8 Outlook 133 A List of MC generators and samples 137 A.1 Monte Carlo generators . . . 137

A.2 Samples for √s = 14 TeV . . . 137

A.3 Samples for √s = 10 TeV . . . 140

B Generator comparison 141 B.1 MC@NLO, Alpgen, and AcerMC . . . 141

B.2 AcerMC/Pythia: ISR and FSR variation . . . 143

References 145

Summary 157

Samenvatting 159

Acknowledgements 161

Referenties

GERELATEERDE DOCUMENTEN

Topographic maps for LI (left) and HI (right), at Pz, for No-Go trials in the Go/No-Go task. Visual representation of one trial in the SSRT. a blue circle) on Go trials (75%

Stopping the “World’s Greatest Threat”: Canadian Policy and Rhetoric towards the Iranian Nuclear Program during Stephen Harper’s Conservative Government, 2006-2015.. by

I think joy, and like, you know, just taking care of yourself and the people around you is really important to this work because we’re in it for the long haul. we have to take care

German’s report, the Corporate Registration program plays a key role in GPEB’s regulatory framework, and is a principal mechanism through which GPEB maintains control over

Britton (1997) concluded that race and gender are contributing factors in stress and further identified the need for future researchers to explore how these intersections

These structural investigations into the mechanism for germ-line antibody recognition of carbohydrate antigens utilizing chlamydial-specific and anti-lipid A antibodies

Our structural analysis revealed that while the N- terminal region of TbFam50.360 adopted a three-helical structure similar to previously characterized trypanosome surface

I showed that data on the structural differences between the native and aggregated forms of the prion protein, obtained from multiple structural proteomics approaches