• No results found

Introduction to the “Best of ACII 2013‿ Special Section

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "Introduction to the “Best of ACII 2013‿ Special Section"

Copied!
2
0
0

Bezig met laden.... (Bekijk nu de volledige tekst)

Hele tekst

(1)

Introduction to the “Best of ACII 2013”

Special Section

Sidney K. D’Mello, Maja Pantic, Fellow, IEEE, and Anton Nijholt

Ç

W

E are delighted to introduce this special section

fea-turing expanded versions of the best papers from the 6th Biannual International Conference on Affective Com-puting and Intelligent Interaction (ACII 2013), held from September 2-5, 2013, in Geneva, Switzerland. The ACII conference series is the flagship conference of the Associa-tion for the Advancement of Affective Computing (aaac— formerly the Humaine Association) and is the premier inter-national forum for all areas of affective computing research. The ACII 2013 conference received 175 full-paper submis-sions, which were rigorously reviewed by members of the Program Committee and further vetted by a Senior Program Committee and the Program Chairs. A total of 55 papers were accepted for oral-presentation at the conference. These 55 papers were ranked based on the scores received during the review process and this special section features enhanced versions of five of the top-ranked papers, which went through additional round(s) of review/revision. These five paper reflect the diversity of affective computing research, ranging from physiological models for affect detection, methodological issues, computational models of affect, and human perceptions of affective virtual agents.

In the first paper, “I Can Already Guess Your Answer: Pre-dicting Respondent Reactions during Dyadic Negotiation,” Park, Scherer, Gratch, Carnevale, and Morency, study non-verbal cues in human-human negotiation scenarios. They investigate whether a diverse set of cues encompassing facial and vocal expressions of the proposer, the respondent, their mutual synchrony, and the past negotiation history can be used to predict whether a negotiation offer will be accepted vs. rejected as well as whether the overall negotiation experi-ence is competitive vs. cooperative. The finding should be of considerable significance to those involved in computer-supported negotiation research.

The second paper, “Correcting Time-Continuous Emo-tional Labels by Modeling the Reaction Lag of Evaluators,” by Mariooryad and Busso, makes an important methodologi-cal contribution to the field of affect detection. It is widely known that supervised affect classifiers are adversely affected by artefacts introduced in the affect annotation pro-cess. In the context of time-continuous affect annotations studied in this paper, the artefact consists of a time delay

between an affective cue and the time taken by an annotator to process the cue and provide the annotation (called the reac-tion lag). The authors propose a method to estimate this time-shift and show that applying their method to correct for the reaction lag has quantifiable improvements on affect detec-tion performance. This finding has implicadetec-tions for research-ers using a time-continuous approach for affect annotation.

The third paper, “Neuroticism, Extraversion, Conscien-tiousness and Stress: Physiological Correlates,” by Brouwer, van Schaik, Korteling, van Erp, and Toet, focus on assessing whether stable personality traits have predictable psycho-logical signatures via measures of skin conductance, heart rate, and heart rate variability. Physiological-personality correlations were studied both during a baseline period and during a stressful period induced by game-play. Their results suggest measurable relationships between physio-logical measures and personality dimensions and highlight the need for psych-physiological theoretical development to explain some of the complex patterns uncovered.

In the fourth paper, “Subjective Perceptions in Wartime Negotiation,” Wang, Pynadath, and Marsella study both subjective-and objective-outcomes of simulated wartime negotiations between humans and computer agents. They find that humans’ satisfaction in the outcome of a negotia-tion goes beyond simple gain/loss assessments to also include their perceptions of the process by which the out-come was achieved (e.g., whether the outout-come was based on a negotiated agreement or an adversarial arrangement). The findings have important implications for those inter-ested in designing computer agents for negotiation tasks.

Finally, in “Humans vs. Computers: Impact of Emotion Expressions on People’s Decision Making,” de Melo, Gratch, and Carnevale study how people differentially respond to emotional expressions of virtual humans when they perceive the virtual humans to be computer-controlled agents or human-controlled avatars. They studied the interaction between agency (computer vs. human) and facial expression (cooperative vs. competitive or anger vs. neutral) on human decision making during social dilemmas and negotiation scenarios. Their findings show that the mere perception of a virtual human as being an agent or an avatar moderates the effects of facial expression on behavior in rather striking ways. This finding has important implications on the design of virtual humans in decision-making scenarios.

We would like to end this editorial by deeply acknowl-edging the reviewers for this special section as well as the reviewers who helped select these five papers from the 175 papers submitted to the conference. We would also like to acknowledge the many individuals who made ACII 2013 a resounding success, especially the conference general chairs (Thierry Pun, Catherine Pelachaud, and Nicu Sebe)

 S. K. D’Mello is with the University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, IN 46556. E-mail: sdmello@nd.edu.

 M. Pantic is with Imperial College London, SW7 2AZ, United Kingdom. E-mail: m.pantic@imperial.ac.uk.

 A. Nijholt is with the University of Twente, 7500AE Enschede, the Nether-lands. E-mail: anijholt@cs.utwente.nl.

For information on obtaining reprints of this article, please send e-mail to: reprints.org, and reference the Digital Object Identifier below.

Digital Object Identifier no. 10.1109/TAFFC.2015.2398011

84 IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON AFFECTIVE COMPUTING, VOL. 6, NO. 2, APRIL-JUNE 2015

1949-3045ß 2015 IEEE. Personal use is permitted, but republication/redistribution requires IEEE permission. See http://www.ieee.org/publications_standards/publications/rights/index.html for more information.

(2)

and the local organizing committee (Guillaume Chanel and Stephane Marchand-Maillet). We would also like to thank all of the authors for submitting their best work to ACII 2013 and are eagerly anticipating a special section on the Best of ACII 2015, following the next conference of the series to be held September 21-24 in Xi’an China.

Sidney K. D’Mello, Guest Editor Maja Pantic, Guest Editor Anton Nijholt, Guest Editor

Sidney K. D’Mello received the PhD degree in computer science from the University of Memphis in 2009. He is currently an assistant professor at the Departments of Computer Science and Psy-chology, University of Notre Dame. His research interests include affective computing, artificial intelligence, human-computer interaction, speech recognition, and natural language understanding. He has published more than 190 journal papers, book chapters, and conference proceedings. He is an associate editor for IEEE Transactions on Affective Computing and IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies.

Maja Pantic (M’98-SM’06-F’12) is currently a professor in affective and behavioural comput-ing at the Department of Computcomput-ing, Imperial College London, UK, and at the Department of Computer Science, University of Twente, the Netherlands. She received various awards for her work on automatic analysis of human behaviour including the European Research Council Starting Grant Fellowship 2008 and the Roger Needham Award 2011. She is cur-rently the editor in chief of Image and Vision Computing Journal and an associate editor for both the IEEE Trans-actions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence and the IEEE Transactions on Cybernetics. She is a fellow of the IEEE.

Anton Nijholt received the PhD degree in com-puter science from the Vrije Universiteit of Amster-dam in 1980. He is currently a full professor of computer science at the University of Twente. He has been program or organizing chair of the main international conferences on affective and enter-tainment computing. His main research interests include affective computing, brain-computer inter-facing, and entertainment computing. Recently his research interests include playful user interfaces and humorous interactions in smart environments. " For more information on this or any other computing topic, please visit our Digital Library at www.computer.org/publications/dlib. D’MELLO ET AL.: INTRODUCTION TO THE “BEST OF ACII 2013” SPECIAL SECTION 85

Referenties

GERELATEERDE DOCUMENTEN

Do staff-members and residents at the department of surgery of the UMCG resist the changes in post-graduate medical education, for what reasons, how are empathy, communication and

The results of all sub departments are presented to the hospital management to see if there are noticeable results: The throughput times of Angiografie are good; CT

Among the non-spray freeze- dried sugars (non-SFD, panel A) and spray freeze-dried sugars (SFD, panel B) inulin raised strong dose-dependent effects whereas dextran and

Figure 6 shows that, ambulance diversion days have a higher average rate of patients arriving per hour from 10:00 until 18:00 compared to the non-ambulance diversion days.. The in-

Taking all the aspects into account: the KPI’s, the graphs, the Christmas and New Year’s Evening peak and the amount of data used to develop the model, the model based on 2016

• Inventory capacity: Each production line is assigned storage space according to the average demand of its items throughout the planning period.. The storage capacity is

Because such an appeal to the laws of nature is often used in arguments about genetically modified crops, transgenic animals, which may cross species boundaries, cloning,

2) Multiple requests simultaneously. Also during the intervention multiple requests to pick up patients arrived simultaneously. The intervention mainly focused on