UvA-DARE is a service provided by the library of the University of Amsterdam (https://dare.uva.nl)
UvA-DARE (Digital Academic Repository)
Regional Trade Agreements in the GATT/WTO: Article XXIV and the Internal
Trade Requirement
Mathis, J.H.
Publication date
2001
Link to publication
Citation for published version (APA):
Mathis, J. H. (2001). Regional Trade Agreements in the GATT/WTO: Article XXIV and the
Internal Trade Requirement. T.M.C. Asser Press.
General rights
It is not permitted to download or to forward/distribute the text or part of it without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), other than for strictly personal, individual use, unless the work is under an open content license (like Creative Commons).
Disclaimer/Complaints regulations
If you believe that digital publication of certain material infringes any of your rights or (privacy) interests, please let the Library know, stating your reasons. In case of a legitimate complaint, the Library will make the material inaccessible and/or remove it from the website. Please Ask the Library: https://uba.uva.nl/en/contact, or a letter to: Library of the University of Amsterdam, Secretariat, Singel 425, 1012 WP Amsterdam, The Netherlands. You will be contacted as soon as possible.
Appendices s
AppendixAppendix One: GATT Article XXIV
PARTT HI
Articlee XXIV
TerritorialTerritorial Application _ Frontier Traffic _ Customs Unions and Free-trade Areas
1.. The provisions of this Agreement shall apply to the metropolitan customs territories of
thee contracting parties and to any other customs territories in respect of which this Agreement has been
acceptedd under Article XXVI or is being applied under Article XXXIII or pursuant to the Protocol of
Provisionall Application. Each such customs territory shall, exclusively for the purposes of the territorial
applicationn of this Agreement, be treated as though it were a contracting party; Provided ihsX the
provisionss of mis paragraph shall not be construed to create any rights or obligations as between two or
moree customs territories in respect of which this Agreement has been accepted under Article XXVI or is
beingg applied under Article XXXIII or pursuant to the Protocol of Provisional Application by a single
contractingg party.
2.. For the purposes of this Agreement a customs territory shall be understood to mean any
territoryy with respect to which separate tariffs or other regulations of commerce are maintained for a
substantiall part of the trade of such territory with other territories.
3.. The provisions of this Agreement shall not be construed to prevent:
(a)(a) Advantages accorded by any contracting party to adjacent countries in order to facilitate
frontierr traffic;
(b)(b) Advantages accorded to the trade with the Free Territory of Trieste by countries
contiguouss to that territory, provided that such advantages are not in conflict with the Treaties of Peace
arisingg out of the Second World War.
4.. The contracting parties recognize the desirability of increasing freedom of trade by the
development,, through voluntary agreements, of closer integration between the economies of the
countriess parties to such agreements. They also recognize that the purpose of a customs union or of a
free-tradefree-trade area should be to facilitate trade between the constituent territories and not to raise barriers to
thee trade of other contracting parties with such territories.
5.. Accordingly, the provisions of this Agreement shall not prevent, as between the
territoriess of contracting parties, the formation of a customs union or of a free-trade area or the adoption
off an interim agreement necessary for the formation of a customs union or of a free-trade area; Provided
that: :
(a)(a) with respect to a customs union, or an interim agreement leading to a formation of a
customss union, the duties and other regulations of commerce imposed at the institution of any such
unionn or interim agreement in respect of trade with contracting parties not parties to such union or
agreementt shall not on the whole be higher or more restrictive than the general incidence of the duties andd regulations of commerce applicable in the constituent territories priorr to the formation of such union orr the adoption of such interim agreement, as the case may be;
(b)(b) with respect to a free-trade area, or an interim agreement leading to the formation of a
free-tradefree-trade area, the duties and other regulations of commerce maintained in each if the constituent territoriess and applicable at the formation of such free-trade area or the adoption of such interim
agreementt to the trade of contracting parties not included in such area or not parties to such agreement shalll not be higher or more restrictive than the corresponding duties and other regulations of commerce existingg in the same constituent territories prior to the formation of the free-trade area, or interim agreementt as the case may be; and
(c)) any interim agreement referred to in sub-paragraphs (a) and (b) shall include a plan and schedulee for the formation of such a customs union or of such a free-trade area within a reasonable lengthh of time.
6.. If, in fulfilling the requirements of sub-paragraph 5 (a), a contracting party proposes to increasee any rate of duty inconsistently with the provisions of Article n, the procedure set forth in Articlee XXVIII shall apply. In providing for compensatory adjustment, due account shall be taken of the compensationn already afforded by the reduction brought about in the corresponding duty of the other constituentss of the union.
7.. (a) Any contracting party deciding to enter into a customs union or free-trade area, orr an interim agreement leading to the formation of such a union or area, shall promptly notify the CONTRACTINGG PARTIES and shall make available to them such information regarding the proposed unionn or area as will enable them to make such reports and recommendations to contracting parties as theyy may deem appropriate.
(b)(b) If, after having studied the plan and schedule included in an interim agreement
referredd to in paragraph 5 in consultation with the parties to that agreement and taking due account of thee information made available in accordance with the provisions of sub-paragraph (a), the
CONTRACTINGG PARTIES find that such agreement is not likely to result in the formation of a customs unionn or of a free-trade area within the period contemplated by the parties to the agreement or that such periodd is not a reasonable one, the CONTRACTING PARTIES shall make recommendations to the parties to thee agreement. The parties shall not maintain or put into force, as the case may be, such agreement if theyy are not prepared to modify it in accordance with these recommendations.
(c)) Any substantial change in the plan or schedule referred to in paragraph 5 (c) shalll be communicated to the CONTRACTING PARTIES, which may request the contracting parties
concernedd to consult with them if the change seems likely to jeopardize or delay unduly the formation of thee customs union or of the free-trade area.
8.. For the purposes of this Agreement:
(a)(a) A customs union shall be understood to mean the substitution of a single customs
territoryy for two or more customs territories, so that
(i)) duties and other restrictive regulations of commerce (except, where necessary, thosee permitted under Articles XI, XII, XIII, XTV, XV and XX) are eliminated with respect to
substantiallyy all the trade between the constituent territories of the union or at least with respect to substantiallyy all the trade in products originating in such territories, and,
(ii)) subject to the provisions of paragraph 9, substantially the same duties and other regulationss of commerce are applied by each of the members of the union to the trade of territories not includedd in the union;
(b)(b) A free-trade area shall be understood to mean a group of two or more customs territoriess in which the duties and other restrictive regulations of commerce (except, where necessary, thosee permitted under Articles XI, XII, XIII, XIV, XV and XX) are eliminated on substantially all the tradee between the constituent territories in products originating in such territories.
9.. The preferences referred to in paragraph 2 of Article I shall not be affected by the formationn of a customs union or of a free-trade area but may be eliminated or adjusted by means of negotiationss with contracting parties affected.* This procedure of negotiations with affected contracting partiess shall, in particular, apply to the elimination of preferences required to conform with the
provisionss of paragraph 8 (a)(i) and paragraph 8 (b).
10.. The CONTRACTING PARTIES may by a two-thirds majority approve proposals which do nott fully comply with the requirements of paragraphs 5 to 9 inclusive, provided that such proposals lead too the formation of a customs union or a free-trade area in the sense of this Article.
11.. Taking into account the exceptional circumstances arising out of the establishment of Indiaa and Pakistan as independent States and recognizing the fact that they have long constituted an economicc unit, the contracting parties agree that the provisions of this Agreement shall not prevent the twoo countries from entering into special arrangements with respect to the trade between them, pending thee establishment of their mutual trade relations on a definitive basis.*
12.. Each contracting party shall take such reasonable measures as may be available to it to ensuree observance of the provisions of this Agreement by the regional and local governments and authoritiess within its territories.
AppendixAppendix Two: GATT-1994 Understanding on the Interpretation of Art. XXIV
Understandingg on the Interpretation of Article XXIV
off the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade 1994
Members, Members,
HavingHaving regard to the provisions of Article XXIV of GATT 1994;
RecognizingRecognizing that customs unions and free trade areas have greatly increased in number and
importancee since the establishment of GATT 1947 and today cover a significant proportion of world
trade; ;
RecognizingRecognizing the contribution to the expansion of world trade that may be made by closer
integrationn between the economies of the parties to such agreements;
RecognizingRecognizing also that such contribution is increased if the elimination between the constituent
territoriess of duties and other restrictive regulations of commerce extends to all trade, and diminished if
anyy major sector of trade is excluded;
ReaffirmingReaffirming that the purpose of such agreements should be to facilitate trade between the
constituentt territories and not to raise barriers to the trade of other Members with such territories; and
thatt in their formation or enlargement the parties to them should to the greatest possible extent avoid
creatingg adverse effects on the trade of other Members;
ConvincedConvinced also of the need to reinforce the effectiveness of the role of the Council for Trade in
Goodss in reviewing agreements notified under Article XXIV, by clarifying the criteria and procedures
forr the assessment of new or enlarged agreements, and improving the transparency of all Article XXIV
agreements; ;
RecognizingRecognizing the need for a common understanding of the obligations of Members under
paragraphh 12 of Article XXIV;
Herebyy agree as follows:
1.. Customs unions, free-trade areas, and interim agreements leading to the formation of a customs
unionn or free-trade area, to be consistent with Article XXIV, must satisfy, inter alia, the provisions of
paragraphss 5, 6, 7 and 8 of that Article.
ArticleArticle XXIV: 5
2.. The evaluation under paragraph 5(a) of Article XXIV of the general incidence of the duties and
otherr regulations of commerce applicable before and after the formation of a customs union shall in
respectt of duties and charges be based upon an overall assessment of weighted average tariff rates and of
customss duties collected. This assessment shall be based on import statistics for a previous
representativee period to be supplied by the customs union, on a tariff-line basis and in values and
quantities,, broken down by WTO country of origin. The Secretariat shall compute the weighted average
tarifff rates and customs duties collected in accordance with the methodology used in the assessment of
tarifff offers in the Uruguay Round of Multilateral Trade Negotiations. For this purpose, the duties and
chargess to be taken into consideration shall be the applied rates of duty. It is recognized that for the purposee of the overall assessment of the incidence of other regulations of commerce for which quantificationn and aggregation are difficult, the examination of individual measures, regulations, productss covered and trade flows affected may be required.
3.. The "reasonable length of time" referred to in paragraph 5(c) of Article XXIV should exceed 100 years only in exceptional cases. In cases where Members parties to an interim agreement believe that 100 years would be insufficient they shall provide a full explanation to the Council for Trade in Goods of thee need for a longer period.
ArticleArticle XXIV: 6
4.. Paragraph 6 of Article XXIV establishes the procedure to be followed when a Member forming aa customs union proposes to increase a bound rate of duty. In this regard Members reaffirm that the proceduree set forth in Article XXVin, as elaborated in the guidelines adopted on 10 November 1980 (BISDD 27S/26-28) and in the Understanding on the Interpretation of Article XXVin of GATT 1994, mustt be commenced before tariff concessions are modified or withdrawn upon the formation of a customss union or an interim agreement leading to the formation of a customs union.
5.. These negotiations will be entered into in good faith with a view to achieving mutually satisfactoryy compensatory adjustment. In such negotiations, as required by paragraph 6 of
Articlee XXIV, due account shall be taken of reductions of duties on the same tariff line made by other constituentss of the customs union upon its formation. Should such reductions not be sufficient to providee the necessary compensatory adjustment, the customs union wouldd offer compensation, which mayy take the form of reductions of duties on other tariff lines. Such an offer shall be taken into
considerationn by the Members having negotiating rights in the binding being modified or withdrawn. Shouldd the compensatory adjustment remain unacceptable, negotiations should be continued. Where, despitee such efforts, agreement in negotiations on compensatory adjustment under Article XXVQI as elaboratedd by the Understanding on the Interpretation of Article XXVin of GATT 1994 cannot be reachedd within a reasonable period from the initiation of negotiations, the customs union shall, nevertheless,, be free to modify or withdraw the concessions; affected Members shall then be free to withdraww substantially equivalent concessions in accordance with Article XXVin.
6.. GATT 1994 imposes no obligation on Members benefiting from a reduction of duties
consequentt upon the formation of a customs union, or an interim agreement leading to the formation of aa customs union, to provide compensatory adjustment to its constituents.
ReviewReview of Customs Unions and Free-Trade Areas
7.. All notifications made under paragraph 7(a) of Article XXIV shall be examined by a working partyy in the light of the relevant provisions of GATT 1994 and of paragraph 1 of this Understanding. Thee working party shall submit a report to the Council for Trade in Goods on its findings in this regard. Thee Council for Trade in Goods may make such recommendations to Members as it deems appropriate. 8.. In regard to interim agreements, the working party may in its report make appropriate
recommendationss on the proposed time-frame and on measures required to complete the formation of thee customs union or free-trade area. It may if necessary provide for further review of the agreement. 9.. Members parties to an interim agreement shall notify substantial changes in the plan and schedulee included in that agreement to the Council for Trade in Goods and, if so requested, the Council shalll examine the changes.
10.. Should an interim agreement notified under paragraph 7(a) of Article XXIV not include a plan andd schedule, contrary to paragraph 5(c) of Article XXTV, the working party shall in its report
recommendd such a plan and schedule. The parties shall not maintain or put into force, as the case may be,, such agreement if they are not prepared to modify it in accordance with these recommendations. Provisionn shall be made for subsequent review of the implementation of the recommendations.
11.. Customs unions and constituents of free-trade areas shall report periodically to the Council for Tradee in Goods, as envisaged by the CONTRACTING PARTIES to GATT 1947 in their instruction to thee GATT 1947 Council concerning reports on regional agreements (BISD 18S/38), on the operation of thee relevant agreement. Any significant changes and/or developments in the agreements should be reportedd as they occur.
DisputeDispute Settlement
12.. The provisions of Articles XXII and XXm of GATT 1994 as elaborated and applied by the Disputee Settlement Understanding may be invoked with respect to any matters arising from the applicationn of those provisions of Article XXIV relating to customs unions, free-trade areas or interim agreementss leading to the formation of a customs union or free-trade area.
ArticleArticle XXIV: 12
13.. Each Member is fully responsible under GATT 1994 for the observance of all provisions of GATTT 1994, and shall take such reasonable measures as may be available to it to ensure such observancee by regional and local governments and authorities within its territory.
14.. The provisions of Articles XXII and XXm of GATT 1994 as elaborated and applied by the Disputee Settlement Understanding may be invoked in respect of measures affecting its observance taken byy regional or local governments or authorities within the territory of a Member. When the Dispute Settlementt Body has ruled that a provision of GATT 1994 has not been observed, the responsible Memberr shall take such reasonable measures as may be available to it to ensure its observance. The provisionss relating to compensation and suspension of concessions or other obligations apply in cases wheree it has not been possible to secure such observance.
Eachh Member undertakes to accord sympathetic consideration to and afford adequate opportunityy for consultation regarding any representations made by another Member concerning measuress affecting the operation of GATT 1994 taken within the territory of the former.
AppendixAppendix Three: Committee on Regional Trade Agreements Annual (1999)
ReportReport (extracted)
(*** indicates deletion for this extract) WORLDD TRADE ORGANIZATION N WT/REG/8 8 111 October 1999 (99-4279) ) REPORTT (1999) OF THE
COMMITTEEE ON REGIONAL TRADE AGREEMENTS TOO THE GENERAL COUNCIL
Chairman:: Mr. Krirk-Krai Jirapaet (Thailand)
I.. INTRODUCTION
Thee terms of reference of the Committee on Regional Trade Agreements (CRTA) are:
"(a)) to carry out the examination of agreements in accordance with the procedures and terms of referencee adopted by the Council for Trade in Goods, the Council for Trade in Services or the Committeee on Trade and Development, as the case may be, and thereafter present its report to the relevantt body for appropriate action;
(b)) to consider how the required reporting on the operation of such agreements should be carried out andd make appropriate recommendations to the relevant body;
(c)) to develop, as appropriate, procedures to facilitate and improve the examination process; (d)) to consider the systemic implications of such agreements and regional initiatives for the multilaterall trading system and the relationship between them, and make appropriate recommendationss to the General Council; and
(e)) to carry out any additional functions assigned to it by the General Council."
Att its first meeting in 1999, the CRTA elected Mr. Krirk-Krai Jirapaet (Thailand) as Chairman of the Committee.. Mr. Chul-Ki Ju (Korea) continued to serve as Vice-Chairman until his departure from Genevaa in Summer 1999. The two other Vice-Chairmen were Mr. Guillermo Gonzalez (Argentina) andd Mr. Andrew Stoler (United States). During 1999, the Committee held four sessions, each includingg examinations of some individual regional trade agreements (RTAs) and discussions of systemicc and general matters (see Attachment 1). A number of informal consultations have also been held,, in an effort to reach conclusions on agreements under review.
* * *
EXAMINATIONN OF REGIONAL TRADE AGREEMENTS
Too date, 118 RTAs have been notified to the GATT/WTO: 93 under GATT Article XXIV; 14 under thee Enabling Clause; and eleven under GATS Article V. The Committee has currently under review a totall of 72 agreements. The examination of 64 of these agreements has been referred to the Committee byy the Council for Trade in Goods (CTG), seven by the Council for Trade in Services (CTS) and one
byy the Committee on Trade and Development (CTD). Draft reports on the examination of 30 agreementss are currently under consideration; for 31 other agreements, reports are being drafted or factuall examinations are currently underway. There are eleven RTAs for which factual examination hass not yet started (see Attachment 2).
Inn the context of the examination of 41 individual agreements, the Committee also considered the Systemm of European Cumulation of Origin, which modified or replaced earlier rules of origin provisionss in those agreements. At the 23rd Session of the CRT A, held in July 1999, the Chairman stressedd the urgency of completing the reports on the examination of 30 RTAs for which the drafting processs was already engaged. The drafting of six of these reports made progress during 1999, but the Committeee has so far been unable to finalize any of them.
REPORTINGG ON THE OPERATION OF AGREEMENTS
Too fulfil item 1(b) of its Terms of Reference, the Committee had adopted, on 20 February 1998, recommendationss to the CTG, CTS and CTD, later adopted by these three bodies, with respect to how requiredd reporting on the operation of RTAs should be carried out. In order to operationalize the reportingg on RTAs notified under GATT Article XXIV, the Committee accepted the Secretariat's proposedd timetable for biennial reporting in 1999 (see Attachment 3). By October 1999, the Secretariatt had received (and was processing for distribution) the biennial reports of the following RTAs:: Caribbean Community and Common Market (CARICOM), Central American Common Markett (CACM), Czech Republic-Slovak
Republicc Customs Union, and European Free Trade Association (EFTA), EFTA-Czech Republic, EFTA-Slovakk Republic, and EFTA-Turkey.
SYSTEMICC IMPLICATIONS OF REGIONAL TRADE AGREEMENTS AND INITIATIVES FOR THEE MULTILATERAL TRADING SYSTEM AND THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN THEM
Underr item 1(d) of the Committee's Terms of Reference, the Committee made use of Members' writtenn submissions and informal papers prepared by the Secretariat (see Attachment 4). hi 1999, the workk of the Committee under this item was built upon questions raised in written contributions by the delegationss of Hong Kong, China and Japan, which attempted to identify the issues that have arisen fromm the interpretation and application of individual provisions of GATS Article V and considered possiblee linkages between GATS Article V and GATT Article XXIV. A further submission on GATS Articlee V by the European Communities and their Member States was circulated on 21 September
1999.. Discussions in the Committee focussed primarily on the interpretation of individual provisions inn GATS Article V, particularly in regard to the scope of "substantial sectoral coverage" and
"substantiallyy all discrimination". Some Members noted that some of
thesee issues were also being considered in the Council for Trade in Services; however, other Members feltt that they should be considered in the Committee as part of the systemic debate.
Att the CRT A's 22nd Session, it was agreed that a synoptic paper would be prepared by the Secretariat, basedd on the "Checklist of Systemic Issues" (document WT/REGAV712) and summarising, on a factuall basis, the discussion that had already taken place on the issues. A first draft was circulated to Memberss by the Secretariat on 22 September 1999. As a further contribution to the work of the CRTT A, the Secretariat has distributed two updates of the informal paper entitled "Basic Information onn Regional Trade Agreements Notified to the GATT/WTO and in Force" (updated on 22 April and 222 September 1999).
FINALL REMARKS
Thee Committee has made substantial headway in the factual examination of a number of RTAs, but hass been unable to finalize reports on any of these examinations. Progress in this regard was slowed, interr alia, by disagreement among Members on the interpretation of certain elements of those rules relatingg to RTAs, as well as on procedural aspects. Similarly, the Committee is not in a position to makee recommendations to the General Council under item 1(d) of its Terms of Reference.
ATTACHMENTT 1
Individuall RTAs examined in 1999
Twenty-Firstt Session - 10-11 February 1999 EC-Principalityy of Andorra Turkey-Hungary y Hungary-Israel l Turkey-Romania a Israel-Czechh Republic Turkey-Israel l Israel-Slovakk Republic Turkey-Lithuania a
Twenty-Secondd Session - 29-30 April and 3 Mayy 1999
EC-Sloveniaa (Interim Agreement) Israel-Slovakk Republic Slovenia-Latvia a Turkey-Hungary y Slovenia-Lithuania a Turkey-Romania a Slovenia-Estonia a Turkey-Israel l EC-Principalityy of Andorra Turkey-Lithuania a Hungary-Israel l CEFTA A Israel-Czechh Republic
Twenty-Thirdd Session - 1-2 July 1999 Slovenia-Latvia a
Turkey-Hungary y Slovenia-Estonia a Turkey-Romania a Latvia-- Czech Republic Turkey-Israel l
Lithuania-Czechh Republic Turkey-Lithuania a
Latvia-Slovakk Republic Estonia-- Czech Republic Lithuania-Slovakk Republic Estonia-- Slovak Republic Hungary-Israel l
Turkey-Czechh Republic Croatia-Slovenia a Turkey-Slovakk Republic Israel-Czechh Republic
EU-Tunisiaa (Med. Agreement) Israel-Slovakk Republic
Turkey-Estonia a
Twenty-Fourthh Session - 22 September and 8 Octoberr 1999
EC-Sloveniaa (Interim Agreement) EC-Principalityy of Andorra Latvia-- Czech Republic Croatia-Slovenia a
Lithuania-Czechh Republic Estonia-- Czech Republic Latvia-Slovakk Republic Estonia-- Slovak Republic Lithuania-Slovakk Republic EU-Tunisiaa (Med. Agreement) ATTACHMENTT 2
RTAss for which draft reports on the
examinationn are currently under consideration (30): :
ANZCERTAA (Services) Bulgaria IA EC-Czechh Republic IA EC-Enlargement (Goods) EC-Enlargementt (Services) EC-Estonia FTA EC-Hungaryy IA EC-Hungary EA (Services) Latviaa FTA Lithuania FTA Polandd IA Poland EA (Services) Romaniaa IA Slovak Republic IA EC-Slovakk Republic EA (Services) CEFTA EFTA-Bulgariaa FTA
EFTA-Estoniaa FTA EFTA-Hungary FTA Israell FTA Latvia FTA Lithuaniaa FTA Poland FTA EFTA-Romaniaa FTA EFTA-Slovenia FTA Iceland-Faroee Islands NAFTA (Goods) NAFTA (Services)) Norway-Faroe Islands Switzerland-Faroee Islands
RTAss for which reports are being drafted or factuall examinations are well engaged (31): Canada-Chilee FTA Canada-Israel FTA Czech Republic-Estoniaa FTA Czech Republic-Latvia FTAA Czech Republic-Lithuania FTA Czech Republic-Turkeyy FTA EC-Faroe Islands EC-P. off Andorra CU EC-Slovenia IA EC-Turkey CUU EU-Tunisia Euro-Mediterranean Agr. Europeann Union (Services) Israel-Czech Republicc FTA Hungary FTA Israel-Slovakk Republic FTA MERCOSUR Poland-Lithuaniaa FTA Romania-Moldova FTA Slovakk Republic-Estonia FTA Slovak
RepublicLatviaa FTA Slovak Republic -Lithuaniaa FTA Slovak Republic-Turkey FTA Slovenia-Croatiaa FTA Slovenia-Estonia FTA Slovenia-Latviaa FTA
Slovenia-Lithuaniaa FTA Turkey-Estonia FTA Turkey-Hungaryy FTA Turkey-Israel FTA Turkey-Lithuaniaa FTA Turkey-Romania FTA
RTAss for which factual examination has not yett commenced (11):
EC-Palestiniann Authority FTA Faroe Islands-Estoniaa Estonia-Latvia-Lithuania FTA Israel-Sloveniaa FTA Kyrgyz Republic-Moldova FTA Kyrgyzz Republic-Russian Fed. FTA
Kyrgyzz Rep.- CU Russian
Fed./Belarus/Kazakhstann Kyrgyz Republic-Ukrainee FTA Kyrgyz Republic-Uzbekistan FTAA Slovenia-F.Y.R.O.M. FTA Turkey-Bulgariaa FTA
ATTACHMENTT 3
Schedulee for the Submission of Biennial Reportss on RTAs in the Course of 1999
Reportss due on 15 May 1999 (10)
Australia-Neww Zealand Closer Economic Relationss Trade Agreement (ANZCERTA)
ATTACHMENTT 4
Listt of Documents on Systemic Issues (1999)
*** (balance of report is omitted)
Australia-Papuaa New Guinea Agreement (PATCRA) )
Caribbeann Community and Common Market (CARICOM) )
Centrall American Common Market (CACM) Czechh Rep ./Slovak Rep. Customs Union Europeann Free Trade Association (EFTA) EFTA/Czechh Rep.
EFTA/SlovakRep. . EFTA/Turkey y Unitedd States/Israel
Reportss due on 15 October 1999 (14) Europeann Communities (EC)/Algeria EC/Cyprus s EC/Egypt t EC/Iceland d EC/Israel l EC/Jordan n EC/Lebanon n EC/Malta a EC/Morocco o EC/Norway y
EC/Certainn Non-European Countries and Territoriess II (PTOMII)
EC/Syria a
EC/Switzerlandd and Liechtenstein EC/Tunisia a
