University of Groningen
Introduction by the Editorial Board - Piracy
Wolf, van der, Michiel
Published in:
Erasmus Law Review DOI:
10.5553/ELR.000132
IMPORTANT NOTE: You are advised to consult the publisher's version (publisher's PDF) if you wish to cite from it. Please check the document version below.
Document Version
Publisher's PDF, also known as Version of record
Publication date: 2018
Link to publication in University of Groningen/UMCG research database
Citation for published version (APA):
Wolf, van der, M. (Ed.) (2018). Introduction by the Editorial Board - Piracy. Erasmus Law Review, 11(4), 205-205. https://doi.org/10.5553/ELR.000132
Copyright
Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download or to forward/distribute the text or part of it without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license (like Creative Commons).
Take-down policy
If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact us providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim.
Downloaded from the University of Groningen/UMCG research database (Pure): http://www.rug.nl/research/portal. For technical reasons the number of authors shown on this cover page is limited to 10 maximum.
Content downloaded/printed from HeinOnline
Mon Feb 17 02:20:58 2020 Citations:
Bluebook 20th ed.
Michiel van der Wolf 11 Erasmus L. Rev. 205 (2018). ALWD 6th ed.
Michiel van der Wolf 11 Erasmus L. Rev. 205 (2018). APA 6th ed.
van der Wolf, M. (2018). Erasmus Law Review, 11(4), 205-205. Chicago 7th ed.
Michiel van der Wolf, "," Erasmus Law Review 11, no. 4 (2018): 205-205 OSCOLA 4th ed.
Michiel van der Wolf, '' (2018) 11 Erasmus L Rev 205 Provided by:
University of Groningen
-- Your use of this HeinOnline PDF indicates your acceptance of HeinOnline's Terms and Conditions of the license agreement available at
https://heinonline.org/HOL/License
-- The search text of this PDF is generated from uncorrected OCR text.
-- To obtain permission to use this article beyond the scope of your license, please use:
Introduction
by the Editorial
Board
- Piracy
Michiel van der Wolf
To some readers the subject of piracy may have a some-what romantic ring to it. This may be understood from a literary and cinematographic perspective, because piracy has a history of being portrayed in a romanticized fashion from Treasure Island to the Pirates of the Carib-bean series. But also from a societal and legal perspec-tive, piracy may be regarded with a touch of romanti-cism. For example, the Buccaneers consisted of adven-turers, exiles and runaway slaves and formed 'floating' societies, which were - as plunderers albeit outlawed from a mainland perspective - governed by their own 'codes'. What has survived in lore as the code of Bartho-lomew Roberts includes rules on egalitarian sharing of the loot, social schemes for those who could not contrib-ute due to disability or illness, no fighting, gambling or women on board, sanctions such as death or exile to a desert island for not fulfilling duties, silence on subjects of personal pasts and futures, lights out at 8pm and of course a rest day for musicians on the Sabbath.
However, the fact that these codes share similarities with those of modern 'outlawed' groups such as mob-sters and motor gangs, already suggests that reality was and is less romantic than grim. Already in the seven-teenth century and still in this day and age, piracy plun-dering is a highly damaging criminal act that is hard to prevent through law enforcement because of several international legal issues. Not only because it is still a universal and topical issue, but also because of this interplay between legal issues in several domains, such as (comparative) criminal law and international (mari-time and trade) law, the subject is especially fit for dis-cussion in our law review. Recently, especially the pre-vention tactic of armed on-board protection of merchant vessels is often discussed.
Therefore we invited guest editors from Denmark and the Netherlands with expertise on the issue to form their on-going comparative efforts on this subject within Europe into a coherent special issue. The body of the issue therefore consists of 'country reports' from - in alphabetical order - Denmark, Germany, Italy and the Netherlands, preceded by an article on the international legal framework. These contributions are preceded by a further introduction to the subject which also lays out the comparative methodology and completed by a con-cluding chapter with comparative insights. Contrary to the contributions in the body of the issue, these two chapters are shorter in length, and do not qualify as independent academic articles. Hence, these have only undergone editorial (board member) review instead of peer review.
Allow me to end on a personal note, as I am glad that I can mark the finish of a six year period in the editorial board of the Erasmus Law Review with such a proto-typical issue. The characteristics of this issue, discussing important issues in a debate between jurisdictions and legal disciplines, are exactly what have made this period more than worthwhile. For what I have learned in dis-cussions with my fellow board members, I am thankful. As I am leaving the Erasmus School of Law my farewell is a given, but I rest assured that the criminal law exper-tise in the Editorial Board of ELR will be adequately maintained by my successors. All the best to ELR. Michiel van der Wolf
205
doi: 10.5553/ELR.000132 - ELR 2018 I No. 4
