University of Groningen
Peeking behind the horizon Brijan, Jan-Willem
DOI:
10.33612/diss.98240363
IMPORTANT NOTE: You are advised to consult the publisher's version (publisher's PDF) if you wish to cite from it. Please check the document version below.
Document Version
Publisher's PDF, also known as Version of record
Publication date: 2019
Link to publication in University of Groningen/UMCG research database
Citation for published version (APA):
Brijan, J-W. (2019). Peeking behind the horizon: a study of black holes in the AdS/CFT correspondence. University of Groningen. https://doi.org/10.33612/diss.98240363
Copyright
Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download or to forward/distribute the text or part of it without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license (like Creative Commons).
Take-down policy
If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact us providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim.
Downloaded from the University of Groningen/UMCG research database (Pure): http://www.rug.nl/research/portal. For technical reasons the number of authors shown on this cover page is limited to 10 maximum.
Propositions Accompanying the dissertation
Peeking behind the horizon: a study of black holes in the AdS/CFT correspondence
1. Encountering mirror operators describing physics in empty AdS builds a strong case for black hole complementarity and the safe crossing of a black hole horizon. (Chapter 4)
2. With heavy operators on the boundary CFT one can create a static (BTZ) black hole in the bulk or an oscillating black hole. (Chapter 5)
3. Large scale non-locality is an essential feature of quantum gravity. (Chapter 3) 4. The AdS/CFT correspondence and its predictions makes one think SUSY should be
there, however the roundness of the electron makes one doubt.
5. The conservation law most often encountered is that of the conservation of misery. 6. Time given to spend on a topic seems inversely proportional to the audience size
(teaching VS publishing).
