• No results found

Semantic and pragmatic functions in Plains Cree syntax - Contents

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "Semantic and pragmatic functions in Plains Cree syntax - Contents"

Copied!
5
0
0

Bezig met laden.... (Bekijk nu de volledige tekst)

Hele tekst

(1)

UvA-DARE is a service provided by the library of the University of Amsterdam (https://dare.uva.nl)

UvA-DARE (Digital Academic Repository)

Semantic and pragmatic functions in Plains Cree syntax

Wolvengrey, A.E.

Publication date

2011

Link to publication

Citation for published version (APA):

Wolvengrey, A. E. (2011). Semantic and pragmatic functions in Plains Cree syntax. LOT.

General rights

It is not permitted to download or to forward/distribute the text or part of it without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), other than for strictly personal, individual use, unless the work is under an open content license (like Creative Commons).

Disclaimer/Complaints regulations

If you believe that digital publication of certain material infringes any of your rights or (privacy) interests, please let the Library know, stating your reasons. In case of a legitimate complaint, the Library will make the material inaccessible and/or remove it from the website. Please Ask the Library: https://uba.uva.nl/en/contact, or a letter to: Library of the University of Amsterdam, Secretariat, Singel 425, 1012 WP Amsterdam, The Netherlands. You will be contacted as soon as possible.

(2)

i

Contents

Contents i List of Tables v List of Figures ix Abbreviations xi Acknowledgements xv

I Introduction to Cree Morphosyntax

1

1 Plains Cree, Grammar, and Cree Grammar 3

1.1 nēhiyawēwin: The Cree Language ... 3

1.1.1 Geographic and Genetic Location ... 5

1.1.2 Typological Background ... 9 1.1.2.1 Phonology ... 9 1.1.2.2 Morphology ... 11 1.1.2.2.1 Animacy ... 12 1.1.2.2.2 Person ... 12 1.1.2.2.3 Obviation ... 14 1.1.2.2.4 Verb Classification ... 17

1.2 Some Important Components of Morphosyntax ... 20

1.2.1 Word Order ... 22

1.2.2 Case-Marking ... 25

1.2.3 Alignment ... 29

1.2.4 Intonation ... 32

1.3 Some Potential Components of Cree Morphosyntax ... 33

1.3.1 Word Order ... 34

1.3.2 Case-Marking ... 37

1.3.3 Alignment ... 40

1.3.4 Intonation ... 41

1.4 Algonquian Studies, Functional Grammar and the Current Work ... 42

1.4.1 Terminological Preliminaries ... 43

(3)

ii Contents

2 Animacy, Direct-Inverse Alignment and Semantic Functions 47

2.1 The Importance of Being Animate ... 47

2.2 Direct-Inverse Alignment: Person, Topicality, Agency and Animacy ... 54

2.2.1 Universal and Algonquian-specific Hierarchies ... 57

2.2.2 Hierarchically-aligned VTA Paradigms ... 64

2.2.2.1 Mixed Set: Speech Act Participants and Third Persons ... 65

2.2.2.2 Third Person Set: Proximate and Obviative ... 76

2.2.2.3 Local Set: Speech Act Participant Interaction ... 81

2.2.3 The Algonquian Semantic Function/Animacy Hierarchy Explored ... 87

2.2.3.1 Monotransitives ... 88

2.2.3.2 Ditransitives ... 95

2.2.4 The Direct-Inverse System and the Algonquian Circle of Reference ... 99

2.2.5 Inanimate Actor VTA ... 102

2.3 Plains Cree Verbs: Transitivity vs. Animacy ... 107

2.3.1 VII, VAI and VTI ... 108

2.3.1.1 Inanimate Intransitive Verbs (VII) ... 109

2.3.1.2 Animate Intransitive Verbs (VAI) ... 110

2.3.1.3 Transitive Inanimate Verbs (VTI) ... 114

2.3.1.4 Transitive Animate Verbs Revisited ... 116

2.3.2 The Cree Verbal System Revisited ... 119

2.3.3 Transitivity-based Cree Verb Classifications ... 125

2.3.3.1 Wolfart and Ahenakew ... 126

2.3.3.2 Okimāsis and Ratt ... 128

2.3.3.3 Transitivity Regularized ... 132

2.3.4 Further Questions ... 144

2.4 An Animacy-based Approach to Cree Verb Classification ... 149

2.4.1 Morphology Regularized ... 150

2.4.1.1 Animacy Over Inanimacy ... 150

2.4.1.2 Morphophonological Subclasses ... 155

2.4.2 Testing the Classification ... 158

2.4.2.1 VAI Unspecified Actor ... 159

2.4.2.2 VTI Unspecified Actor ... 161

2.4.2.3 VTA Unspecified Actor ... 163

2.4.3 Cree Verbal Constructions and Animate Participants ... 168

2.5 Conclusions ... 171

3 Syntactic Functions and Pragmatic Discourse Status 173 3.1 Inverse ... 173

3.1.1 A Test for Object ... 177

3.2 Unspecified Actor ... 185

3.2.1 A Test for Subject ... 185

(4)

II Plains Cree Word Order

195

4 Semantic Functions and Word Order 197

4.1 Word Order Variability ... 197

4.2 Clause Structure Models ... 209

4.3 Semantic Function Ordering ... 213

4.4 The Position of Postverbal Constituents ... 225

4.4.1 Postverbal Arguments ... 226

4.4.2 Postverbal Modifiers ... 232

4.4.3 Interaction of Postverbal Arguments and Modifiers ... 236

4.4.4 Postverbal Constituents Summarized ... 240

5 Syntactically-conditioned Word Order 243 5.1 PM–1 ... 244

5.1.1 Relative Root Antecedents in PM–1 ... 246

5.1.1.1 Quoting Speech, Thought and Names ... 248

5.1.1.2 Other Instances of /it-/ ~ isi- ~ isi ... 260

5.1.1.3 /oht-/ ~ ohci- ~ ohci ... 263

5.1.1.4 Other Relative Roots ... 264

5.1.2 Quantifiers, Intensifiers and Degree Modifiers ... 269

5.1.2.1 mitoni, mistahi, iyikohk ... 269

5.1.2.2 kahkiyaw and other Quantifiers ... 274

5.2 Clause Linkage ... 277

5.2.1 Coordinators (and Subordinators) ... 277

5.2.2 Temporals ... 284

5.3 P2 Introduced ... 288

5.3.1 Coordinators and Emphatic Particles ... 289

5.3.2 Demonstratives, Focus Particles and Copulas ... 293

5.4 Conclusions ... 299

6 Pragmatic Functions and Word Order 303 6.1 Clausal Constituents ... 303 6.1.1 PI ... 304 6.1.1.1 cī Interrogatives ... 304 6.1.1.2 Content Interrogatives ... 311 6.1.1.3 Non-Interrogative Cleft-Focus ... 319 6.1.1.4 Topic ... 321 6.1.2 PI+1, P2+1 and PM–1 ... 325 6.1.2.1 PM–1 Dismissed ... 326 6.1.2.2 PI+1 versus P2+1 ... 328

6.1.3 Preverbal Templates Summarized ... 334

(5)

iv Contents 6.2 Extra-Clausal Constituents ... 340 6.2.1 Ppre ... 341 6.2.1.1 Orientation ... 341 6.2.1.1.1 Temporal Setting ... 341 6.2.1.1.2 Locative Setting ... 343 6.2.1.1.3 Topic ... 344 6.2.1.1.3.1 Discourse Topic ... 344 6.2.1.1.3.2 Topical Participants ... 346

6.2.1.2 Attitude Specification and Interaction Management ... 349 6.2.1.2.1 Attitudinals ... 349 6.2.1.2.2 Interactionals ... 350 6.2.1.2.2.1 Vocative ... 350 6.2.1.3 Ppre Summarized ... 352 6.2.2 Ppost ... 352 6.2.2.1 Clarification/Afterthought ... 353 6.2.2.1.1 Arguments ... 353 6.2.2.1.2 Locatives ... 357 6.2.2.1.3 Temporals ... 359

6.2.2.1.4 Other Modification and Emphasis ... 360

6.2.2.2 Vocative ... 363

6.2.2.3 Ppost Summarized ... 364

6.3 Plains Cree Word Order Templates Summarized ... 364

7 Conclusions and Further Research 369 References 377 Appendices 391 Appendix A:A Transitivity-based Morphosyntactic Classification of Plains Cree Verb Paradigms ...393

Appendix B:An Animacy-based Morphophonemic Classification of Plains Cree Verb Paradigms ...413

Summary 431

Samenvatting 433

Referenties

GERELATEERDE DOCUMENTEN

Topographic maps for LI (left) and HI (right), at Pz, for No-Go trials in the Go/No-Go task. Visual representation of one trial in the SSRT. a blue circle) on Go trials (75%

Stopping the “World’s Greatest Threat”: Canadian Policy and Rhetoric towards the Iranian Nuclear Program during Stephen Harper’s Conservative Government, 2006-2015.. by

I think joy, and like, you know, just taking care of yourself and the people around you is really important to this work because we’re in it for the long haul. we have to take care

German’s report, the Corporate Registration program plays a key role in GPEB’s regulatory framework, and is a principal mechanism through which GPEB maintains control over

Britton (1997) concluded that race and gender are contributing factors in stress and further identified the need for future researchers to explore how these intersections

These structural investigations into the mechanism for germ-line antibody recognition of carbohydrate antigens utilizing chlamydial-specific and anti-lipid A antibodies

Our structural analysis revealed that while the N- terminal region of TbFam50.360 adopted a three-helical structure similar to previously characterized trypanosome surface

I showed that data on the structural differences between the native and aggregated forms of the prion protein, obtained from multiple structural proteomics approaches