• No results found

Modality in typological perspective - Contents

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "Modality in typological perspective - Contents"

Copied!
4
0
0

Bezig met laden.... (Bekijk nu de volledige tekst)

Hele tekst

(1)

UvA-DARE is a service provided by the library of the University of Amsterdam (https://dare.uva.nl)

UvA-DARE (Digital Academic Repository)

Modality in typological perspective

Nauze, F.D.

Publication date 2008

Link to publication

Citation for published version (APA):

Nauze, F. D. (2008). Modality in typological perspective. Institute for Logic, Language and Computation.

General rights

It is not permitted to download or to forward/distribute the text or part of it without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), other than for strictly personal, individual use, unless the work is under an open content license (like Creative Commons).

Disclaimer/Complaints regulations

If you believe that digital publication of certain material infringes any of your rights or (privacy) interests, please let the Library know, stating your reasons. In case of a legitimate complaint, the Library will make the material inaccessible and/or remove it from the website. Please Ask the Library: https://uba.uva.nl/en/contact, or a letter to: Library of the University of Amsterdam, Secretariat, Singel 425, 1012 WP Amsterdam, The Netherlands. You will be contacted as soon as possible.

(2)

Contents

Acknowledgments ix

Introduction 1

1 Typology and modality 7

1.1 Typology . . . 7

1.1.1 Variation in the languages of the world . . . 7

1.1.2 Language comparison . . . 8

1.1.3 Three steps of typology . . . 9

1.1.4 Language sample . . . 10

1.1.5 Language universals . . . 11

1.2 Typologies of modality . . . 12

1.2.1 Palmer . . . 12

1.2.2 Hengeveld . . . 14

1.2.3 Van der Auwera and Plungian . . . 16

1.2.4 Typology of modality . . . 18

2 Typological investigation of six modal systems 19 2.1 Dutch . . . 20

2.1.1 Dutch modal system . . . 21

2.1.2 Combinations of modal items . . . 30

2.2 Fon cluster . . . 36

2.2.1 Fon modal system . . . 38

2.2.2 Combinations of modal items . . . 49

2.3 Korean . . . 54

2.3.1 Korean modal system . . . 54

2.3.2 Combinations of modal items . . . 69

2.4 Lillooet . . . 71

2.4.1 Lillooet modal system . . . 73 v

(3)

2.4.2 Combinations of modal items . . . 84

2.5 Turkish . . . 89

2.5.1 Turkish modal system . . . 90

2.5.2 Combinations of modal items . . . 100

2.6 Tuvaluan . . . 103

2.6.1 Tuvaluan modal system . . . 106

2.6.2 Combinations of modal items . . . 115

2.7 Typological conclusions . . . 119

2.7.1 Participant-internal modality . . . 120

2.7.2 Participant-external modality . . . 125

2.7.3 Epistemic modality . . . 127

2.7.4 Combinations of modal items . . . 127

2.7.5 Polyfunctionality . . . 127

3 Formal semantics of modality 131 3.1 Kratzer’s semantics of modality . . . 131

3.1.1 Relative modality . . . 132

3.1.2 Double relativity . . . 137

3.1.3 Example . . . 141

3.2 Extensions of the standard framework . . . 143

3.2.1 Goal-oriented modality . . . 143

3.2.2 Modals and conditionals . . . 145

3.2.3 Brennan: the epistemic/root distinction . . . 146

4 Some problems of the standard framework 153 4.1 Polyfunctionality and context-dependence . . . 153

4.1.1 Ineffability of conversational backgrounds . . . 154

4.1.2 Non-polyfunctional modals . . . 156 4.1.3 Polyfunctional modals . . . 157 4.1.4 Conclusion . . . 157 4.2 Participant-internal modality . . . 158 4.2.1 Asymmetry . . . 158 4.2.2 Disjunctive abilities . . . 160

4.2.3 Inference from epistemic modality . . . 161

4.3 Participant-external modality . . . 163

4.3.1 The content of a deontic ordering source . . . 163

4.3.2 Zvolenszky’s problem . . . 165

4.3.3 Goal-oriented modality . . . 170

4.4 Combinations of modals . . . 175 vi

(4)

5 Update semantics framework 181

5.1 Epistemic and deontic modality . . . 182

5.1.1 Epistemic above deontic modality . . . 201

5.1.2 In the scope of deontic modals . . . 202

5.2 Goal-oriented and participant-internal modality . . . 204

5.2.1 Goal-oriented modality: a first sketch . . . 205

5.2.2 Participant-internal modality . . . 211 Conclusion 219 List of abbreviations 225 Samenvatting 227 Bibliography 229 vii

Referenties

GERELATEERDE DOCUMENTEN

Topographic maps for LI (left) and HI (right), at Pz, for No-Go trials in the Go/No-Go task. Visual representation of one trial in the SSRT. a blue circle) on Go trials (75%

Stopping the “World’s Greatest Threat”: Canadian Policy and Rhetoric towards the Iranian Nuclear Program during Stephen Harper’s Conservative Government, 2006-2015.. by

I think joy, and like, you know, just taking care of yourself and the people around you is really important to this work because we’re in it for the long haul. we have to take care

German’s report, the Corporate Registration program plays a key role in GPEB’s regulatory framework, and is a principal mechanism through which GPEB maintains control over

Britton (1997) concluded that race and gender are contributing factors in stress and further identified the need for future researchers to explore how these intersections

These structural investigations into the mechanism for germ-line antibody recognition of carbohydrate antigens utilizing chlamydial-specific and anti-lipid A antibodies

Our structural analysis revealed that while the N- terminal region of TbFam50.360 adopted a three-helical structure similar to previously characterized trypanosome surface

I showed that data on the structural differences between the native and aggregated forms of the prion protein, obtained from multiple structural proteomics approaches