• No results found

The limits of freedom of expression in the post-truth era

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "The limits of freedom of expression in the post-truth era"

Copied!
42
0
0

Bezig met laden.... (Bekijk nu de volledige tekst)

Hele tekst

(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
(7)

(8)
(9)
(10)
(11)
(12)
(13)
(14)
(15)
(16)
(17)
(18)
(19)
(20)
(21)
(22)
(23)
(24)
(25)
(26)
(27)
(28)
(29)

Harm Principle Moral Offense Principle

Type of Principle Moral Moral (Modified from a Legal Principle)

Proposed Limits Physical Harm/Injury Serious Offense/Hate Speech

Interpretatio of

Identification Active Process Passive Process

Interpretation of Freedom of Expression

A means of progress towards the Truth

(Optimistic)

Reinforcing the Position of an Oppressive Elite (Pessimistic)

(30)
(31)
(32)
(33)
(34)
(35)
(36)
(37)
(38)
(39)
(40)
(41)

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

(42)

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Referenties

GERELATEERDE DOCUMENTEN

Further issues arise as well: whether algorithmically generated content should be considered speech, whether the controllers of algorithms are content providers or

A creative approach would highlight the aspects of difference at the same time and unlock the potential for identification with those aspects by the dominant culture in order

Integrale Vroeghulp is een effectieve werkwijze voor het vroegtijdig onderkennen en preventieve vroeghulp van​ kinderen van 0 tot 7 jaar met  (mogelijk) meervoudige ontwikkelings-

By recording the low-frequency height control signal z and the residual error signal dz, we can reconstruct the ‘ideal’ surface contour z + dz that the tip would have followed at

Setting the terms of the debates in this way evacuates in turn any question about the function- ing of media institutions and their role in the dissemination of Islamo- phobia

) In) de) theore,sche) bespreking) van) het) concept) ‘probleemoplossend) vermogen’) hebben) wij) het) gedefinieerd) als) ) ‘het) vermogen) van) een) overheid) om)

Dat in deze studie slechts het verschil in sociale categorisatie werd gevonden en niet de intergroup bias tussen simpele en multipele categorisatie, kan worden verklaard doordat

Therefore, there is no justification for making culpa levissima a general criterion for the lex Aquilia, nor is it possible to deduce from this text that it was only in the case