• No results found

Predictors of pain six months after musculoskeletal trauma: towards preventing chronic pain

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "Predictors of pain six months after musculoskeletal trauma: towards preventing chronic pain"

Copied!
1
0
0

Bezig met laden.... (Bekijk nu de volledige tekst)

Hele tekst

(1)

More information: Jorien Pierik, MSc PhD candidate

W: www.utwente.nl/mb/htsr E: J.G.J.Pierik@utwente.nl

Fracture Luxation Distortion Contusion

PREDICTORS OF PAIN SIX MONTHS AFTER

MUSCULOSKELETAL TRAUMA

BACKGROUND AND AIM

STUDY DESIGN AND POPULATION

1.University Twente, Health Technology & Services Research, MIRA institute for Biomedical Technology and Technical Medicine, Enschede 2. Medisch Spectrum Twente, Emergency Department and Department of Surgery, Enschede 3. University Twente, Biomedical Signals and Systems, Faculty of Electrical Engineering, MIRA institute for Biomedical Technology and Technical Medicine, Enschede, The Netherlands

TOWARDS PREVENTING CHRONIC PAIN‐

Acute musculoskeletal pain is one of the primary complaints of patients in the Emergency Department (ED).

Multiple factors within this acute pain phase may be responsible for transition from acute to chronic pain.

The aim is to find prognostic factors that will give us the ability to target high‐risk patients in the emergency setting

and provide them with appropriate treatment to prevent chronic musculoskeletal pain

In a prospective cohort study (PROTACT) adult patients with injury due to blunt trauma to the extremities of the

musculoskeletal system who attend the ED of Medisch Spectrum Twente, the Netherlands were followed for six months.

Characteristics of patients, including psychosocial‐, biomedical and health related factors, and perception of pain were

collected from hospital registration and questionnaires at ED‐visit, 6 weeks‐ 3 ‐and 6 months follow‐up.

RESULTS

DISCUSSION

In the PROTACT‐study 43% of patients still have pain six months after trauma.

Potentially modifiable factors, such as severe pain at discharge, kinesiofobia and anxiety might be addressed through

intervention in emergency setting to prevent chronic pain.

Pierik JGJ

1

, IJzerman MJ

1

, Van Vugt AB

2

, Vollenbroek‐Hutten MMR

3

, Doggen CJM

1

Characteristics of 250 patients

Men (n (%)) 107 (42.8 %) Age (mean, SD) 45.97 (SD=14.9) Months follow‐up period, (mean (min‐max), SD) 7.4 (5.0‐14.0) (SD=1.8) Pain ± 6 months after trauma (n (%)) 108 (43.2 %) Pain interference in daily activity ± 6 months after trauma (n (%)) 93 (37.2 %)

Independent predictors of chronic (n=178)

ORadj (95% CI)

Age# 1.01 (0.99‐1.04)

Gender Men ⊺

Women 1.36 (0.68‐2.71)

Chronic pain before trauma No ⊺

Yes 2.53* (1.10‐5.77)

Kinesiofobia No ⊺

Yes 2.21* (1.13‐4.35)

Anxiety No ⊺

Yes 3.04 (0.97‐9.59)

Pain level at discharge ED Tolerable (NRS<4) ⊺

Moderate 3.03* (1.04‐8.84) Severe (NRS>6) 3.05* (1.07‐8.66) Potential risk and protective factors associated with chronic pain N n OR (95% CI) Age 18‐29 56 21 ⊺ 30‐54 122 57 1.46 (0.77‐2.79) 55‐69 72 30 1.19 (0.58‐2.44) Gender Men 107 39 ⊺ Women 143 69 1.62 (0.97‐2.74) Kinesiofobia No 104 33 ⊺ Yes 79 44 2.71* (1.48‐4.96) Anxiety No 215 87 ⊺ Yes 28 19 3.11* (1.34‐7.18) Depression No 227 96 ⊺ Yes 13 9 3.07 (0.92‐7.26) Pain catastrophizing No 168 62 ⊺ Yes 14 13 22.23* (2.84‐174.03)

Education level High 105 41 ⊺

Low 138 65 1.39 (0.83‐2.33)

Compensation status No 194 79 ⊺

Yes 8 6 4.37 (0.86‐22.19)

Chronic pain before trauma No 162 60 ⊺

Yes 42 25 2.50* (1.25‐5.00)

Pain level at admission ED Tolerable (NRS<4) 29 7 ⊺

Moderate 69 24 1.68 (0.63‐4.49) Severe (NRS>6) 148 76 3.32* (1.34‐8.28)

Pain level at discharge ED Tolerable (NRS<4) 50 10 ⊺

Moderate 68 28 2.80* (1.20‐6.52) Severe (NRS>6) 112 59 4.45* (2.03‐9.78) Surgery No 210 87 ⊺ Yes 40 20 1.52 (0.74‐3.11) 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 No pain Minimal pain Mild pain Moderate pain Severe pain per cen ta ge  of  pa tien ts  (% ) Very severe pain with daily activities (NRS 9‐10) Severe pain with daily activities (NRS 7‐8) Moderate pain with daily activities (NRS 5‐6) Mild pain with daily activities  (NRS 3‐4) Minimal pain with daily activities (NRS 1‐2) No pain with daily activities (NRS 0) ⊺ = reference group * = category is significantly (p<0.05) different with the reference group #= continuous in model Pain and pain interference after six months follow‐up. The prevalence of pain (NRS >=1) six months after injury was 43%. More than three‐quarter of these patients had also pain interference with their daily activities.

Referenties

GERELATEERDE DOCUMENTEN

In the ICO Dissertation Series the dissertations of graduate students from faculties and institutes on educational research within the ICO Partner Universities are

Chapter 4 Human adipose tissue-derived stromal cells act as functional pericytes in mice and suppress high- glucose-induced proinflammatory activation of

By applying the K-means algorithm this project aims to answer the following research question: What type of groups can be discovered in data on Dam tot Dam loop 2014 participants

Inspection of the coefficients of the fitted linear models showed that the coefficient distributions of the full embeddings best resembled those of the night bundle embeddings, and

the human participants, the cooperative, aggressive, and metacognitive models played against the fair and unfair agents for three blocks of 12 trials each.. To ensure stable data,

De onafhankelijke variabelen zijn de variabelen die verschillende waarden bij afhankelijke variabelen kunnen verklaren. Zodoende is het belangrijk om deze duidelijk uit te werken en

The results from the modal analyses provide the natural frequencies, mode shapes and strain energy distribution maps of the relevant modes of the structure, from which the

periodic status reporting from the DP to the CP on each node’s behaviour and characteristics and also also allows to send parameter configuration messages from the CP to the DP.