• No results found

Object drop in the L1 acquisition of Dutch - List of tables and figures

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "Object drop in the L1 acquisition of Dutch - List of tables and figures"

Copied!
6
0
0

Bezig met laden.... (Bekijk nu de volledige tekst)

Hele tekst

(1)

UvA-DARE is a service provided by the library of the University of Amsterdam (https://dare.uva.nl)

UvA-DARE (Digital Academic Repository)

Object drop in the L1 acquisition of Dutch

Thrift, K.E.

Publication date

2003

Link to publication

Citation for published version (APA):

Thrift, K. E. (2003). Object drop in the L1 acquisition of Dutch. LOT.

General rights

It is not permitted to download or to forward/distribute the text or part of it without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), other than for strictly personal, individual use, unless the work is under an open content license (like Creative Commons).

Disclaimer/Complaints regulations

If you believe that digital publication of certain material infringes any of your rights or (privacy) interests, please let the Library know, stating your reasons. In case of a legitimate complaint, the Library will make the material inaccessible and/or remove it from the website. Please Ask the Library: https://uba.uva.nl/en/contact, or a letter to: Library of the University of Amsterdam, Secretariat, Singel 425, 1012 WP Amsterdam, The Netherlands. You will be contacted as soon as possible.

(2)

L

IST OF

T

ABLES AND

F

IGURES Tables

Table 2.1 Demonstrative Pronouns in Dutch Table 2.2 Other D-Words in Dutch

Table 2.3 Rates of Argument Drop from Topic Position in Adult Dutch: Personal versus Demonstrative Pronouns (based on Jansen 1981)

Table 2.4 Rates of Subject and Object Drop from Topic Position In Adult Dutch (based on Jansen 1981)

Table 2.5 Ability for Various Constituents to Topicalize, Undergo D-Word Replacement or Undergo Drop

Table 2.6 Four Potential Grammars for Child Dutch Object Drop Table 3.1 Summary of Rates of Subject Drop and Object

Drop in Child English (based on Hyams and Wexler 1993)

Table 3.2 Rates of Obligatory and Optional Object Drop in Child English (based on Valian 1991)

Table 3.3 Rates of Dropped Objects in VACs (Adam, Eve, Sarah) (based on Sawyer 1999)

Table 3.4 Rates of Null Subjects and Null Objects in Child French (Spontaneous Data) (based on Jakubowicz et al 1997b)

Table 3.5 Rates of Null Subjects and Null Objects in Child Japanese (based on Hirakawa 1993 and Guerriero et al 2001)

Table 3.6 Rates of Null Subjects and Null Objects in Child Chinese (based on Wang et al 1992)

Table 3.7 Rates of Null Subjects and Null Objects in Child

German (based on Jakubowicz et al 1997b and Hamann 1996)

Table 3.8 Rates of Target-Deviant Object Drop out of All Object Drop in Child German (based on Boser 1997, Jakubowicz et al 1997b, and Hamann 1996)

Table 3.9 Rates of Null Subjects and Null Objects in Child Dutch (based on Krämer 1995)

Table 3.10 Rates of Object Drop with Optionally and Obligatorily Transitive Verbs in Child Dutch (based on Krämer 1995)

(3)

TABLES AND FIGURES 246 Table 3.11 Rates of Object Drop with Finite and Infinitival

Obligatorily Transitive Verbs in Child Dutch (based on

Krämer 1995)

Table 3.12 Rates of Object Drop with Finite Obligatorily Transitive Verbs and Embedded Infinitival Obligatorily Transitive Verbs in Child Dutch (based on Krämer 1995)

Table 3.13 Rate of Ungrammatical (Postverbal Obligatory Object Drop in Child Dutch (based on Blankenstijn and

Scheper, forthcoming)

Table 3.14 Rates of Sentence-Initial Object Drop not Meeting Discourse Criteria (Blankenstijn & Scheper, forthcoming)

Table 3.15 Rates of Null Subjects and Null Objects Across

Child Languages

Table 4.1 Arnold’s Age & MLU Table 4.2 Diederik’s Age & MLU Table 4.3 Gijs’ Age & MLU Table 4.4 Joost’s Age & MLU Table 4.5 Katelijne’s Age & MLU Table 4.6 Maria’s Age & MLU

Table 4.7 Division of Data into MLU Levels

Table 5.1 Average Rates of Subject and Obligatory Object Drop in All Utterances in Young Dutch Children (n=6) by MLU Level

Table 5.2 Average Rate of Obligatory and Optional Object Drop in All Utterances in Young Dutch Children (n=6) by MLU Level Table 5.3 Average Rate of Object Drop in All Utterances in Young

Dutch Children (n=6) by Sentence Position

Table 5.4 Rate of Object Drop from Sentence-Initial Position as a Proportion of All Object Drop in All Utterances in Young Dutch Children (n=6) by MLU Level

Table 5.5 Rate of Object Drop by Sentence Position for Arnold Table 5.6 Rate of Object Drop by Sentence Position for Diederik Table 5.7 Rate of Object Drop by Sentence Position for Gijs Table 5.8 Rate of Object Drop by Sentence Position for Joost Table 5.9 Rate of Object Drop by Sentence Position for Katelijne Table 5.10 Rate of Object Drop by Sentence Position for Maria

Table 5.11 Average Rate of Object Drop in Finite and Nonfinite Clauses in All Utterances in Young Dutch Children (n=6)

(4)

Table 5.12 Average Rate of Object Drop in Finite and Nonfinite Clauses in All Utterances in Young Dutch Children (n=6) by MLU Level

Table 5.13 Rate of Object Drop in Finite and Nonfinite Clauses for Arnold Table 5.14 Rate of Object Drop in Finite and Nonfinite Clauses for

Diederik

Table 5.15 Rate of Object Drop in Finite and Nonfinite Clauses for Gijs Table 5.16 Rate of Object Drop in Finite and Nonfinite Clauses for Joost Table 5.17 Rate of Object Drop in Finite and Nonfinite Clauses for

Katelijne

Table 5.18 Rate of Object Drop in Finite and Nonfinite Clauses for Maria Table 5.19 Average Rate of Object Drop in Perfective and Non-Perfective

Clauses in All Utterances in Young Dutch Children (n=6) Table 5.20 Average Rate of Object Drop in Perfective and Non-Perfective

Clauses in All Utterances in Young Dutch Children (n=6) by MLU Level

Table 5.21 Object Drop in Perfective and Non-Perfective Clauses in Arnold

Table 5.22 Object Drop in Perfective and Non-Perfective Clauses in Diederik

Table 5.23 Object Drop in Perfective and Non-Perfective Clauses in Gijs Table 5.24 Object Drop in Perfective and Non-Perfective Clauses in Joost Table 5.25 Object Drop in Perfective and Non-Perfective Clauses in

Katelijne

Table 5.26 Object Drop in Perfective and Non-Perfective Clauses in Maria Table 5.27 Average Rates of Object Drop with Infinitival and Finite

Perfective Verbs and Other Infinitival and Finite Verbs in All Utterances in Young Dutch Children (n=6)

Table 5.28 Average Rates of Object Drop with Infinitival Perfective Verbs and Other Infinitival Verbs in All Utterances Young Dutch Children (n=6) by MLU Level

Table 5.29 Average Rates of Object Drop with Finite Perfective Verbs and Other Finite Verbs in All Utterances in Young Dutch Children (n=6) by MLU Level

Table 5.30 Rates of Object Drop with Infinitival and Finite Perfective Verbs and Other Infinitival and Finite Verbs for Arnold

Table 5.31 Rates of Object Drop with Infinitival and Finite Perfective Verbs and Other Infinitival and Finite Verbs for Diederik Table 5.32 Rates of Object Drop with Infinitival and Finite Perfective

Verbs and Other Infinitival and Finite Verbs for Gijs

Table 5.33 Rates of Object Drop with Infinitival and Finite Perfective Verbs and Other Infinitival and Finite Verbs for Joost

(5)

TABLES AND FIGURES 248 Table 5.34 Rates of Object Drop with Infinitival and Finite Perfective

Verbs and Other Infinitival and Finite Verbs for Katelijne Table 5.35 Rates of Object Drop with Infinitival and Finite Perfective

Verbs and Other Infinitival and Finite Verbs for Maria

Table 5.36 Object Drop with Past Perfective Clauses, Particle Verbs and Other Telic Verb Clusters in All Utterances in Young Dutch Children (n=6)

Table 5.37 Object Drop in Particle Verbs and Past Perfective Clauses in All Utterances in Young Dutch Children (n=6) by MLU Level Table 5.38 Stages, MLUs, Ages and Rates of Object Drop in Child Dutch Table 6.1 Child Languages in which Telicity Effects were Found (based

on Wagner 1999)

Table 6.2 Average Rates of Infinitival Clauses in Transitive Particle Verbs and Transitive Non-particle Verbs in All Utterances by Young Dutch Children (n=6) by MLU Level

Table 6.3 Rates of Object Drop with Particle Verbs Compared to Rates of Infinitival Particle in All Utterances in Young Dutch Children (n=6) by MLU Level

Table 6.4 First Appearances of Determiners in Child Dutch (based on Schaerlaekens and Gillis 1987)

Table 6.5 Ages and MLUs of Regular Determiner Use and Decreased

Object Drop for Individual Children

Table 6.6 Rates of Dropped Objects in VACs (Adam, Eve and Sarah)

(based on Sawyer 1999)

Table 6.7 Adam’s Age and MLU Range

Table 6.8 Rate of Object Drop with Telic and Atelic VACs in Adam FIGURES

Figure 4.1 Hierarchy of Classification for Object Drop Figure 4.2 Hierarchy of Classification for Subject Drop

Figure 4.3 Hierarchy of Classification for Optional & Obligatory Transitives

Figure 4.4 Hierarchy of Classification for Sentence-Initial Object Drop Figure 4.5 Hierarchy of Classification for Topicalized Objects

Figure 4.6 Hierarchy of Classification for Finite and Nonfinite Clauses Figure 4.7 Hierarchy of Classification for Perfectivity

Figure 5.1 Average Rates of Subject and Obligatory Object Drop in All Utterances in Young Dutch Children (n=6) by MLU Level

(6)

Figure 5.2 Average Rate of Obligatory and Optional Object Drop in All Utterances in Young Dutch Children (n=6) by MLU Level Figure 5.3 Average Rate of Object Drop in Finite and Nonfinite Clauses

in All Utterances in Young Dutch Children (n=6) by MLU Level

Figure 5.4 Average Rate of Object Drop in Perfective and Non-Perfective Clauses in All Utterances in Young Dutch Children (n=6) by MLU Level

Figure 5.4 Hierarchy of Classification for Perfective Infinitival and Finite Verbs and Other Infinitival and Finite Verbs

Referenties

GERELATEERDE DOCUMENTEN

It is not permitted to download or to forward/distribute the text or part of it without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), other than for strictly

Welke invloed hebben schaalgrootte (schaalverschillenn tussen scholen) en schaalverandering, in het bijzonder de in- voeringg van bovenschools management (een combinatie

If you believe that digital publication of certain material infringes any of your rights or (privacy) interests, please let the Library know, stating your reasons. In case of

Dee publicatie van dit proefschrift werd mogelijk gemaakt door financiële steun vann het SCO Kohnstamm Instituut en Stichting Kohnstamm Fonds voor Onderwijsresearchh te

Schaal in het primair onderwijs : een studie naar de relatie tussen schaal en organisatie-effectiviteit.. van de

Schaal in het primair onderwijs : een studie naar de relatie tussen schaal en organisatie-effectiviteit.. van de

Er zijn uiteraard veel verschillen, maar in dee meeste van deze typologieën kunnen twee dimensies onderscheiden worden: eenn taakgerichte dimensie, gericht op de behoeften, doelen

Voor beantwoording van de vierde onderzoeksvraag is een multiple regressieanalysee uitgevoerd om te onderzoeken of de predictoren schaalgrootte, structuur,, sturing en