• No results found

Getting internationally published in the applied sciences

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "Getting internationally published in the applied sciences"

Copied!
11
0
0

Bezig met laden.... (Bekijk nu de volledige tekst)

Hele tekst

(1)

Getting internationally published

in the applied sciences

Louw Hoffman

Department of Animal Sciences

lch@sun.ac.za

(2)

My research

(3)

Food Security at SU

Production

activities

Fresh

meat

Processed meat

(4)

Production

activities

Fresh

meat

Processed meat

Research Focus

sufficient, safe and

nutritious food

sufficient, safe and

nutritious food

sustainable

agricultural

productivity

sustainable

agricultural

productivity

nutritional

value

nutritional

value

Increase production

(5)

Production

activities

Fresh

meat

Processed meat

Meat Red Traditionally Farmed species Exotic meat Poultry Farmed Wild fowl Fish / aquaculture Farmed Wild Crayfish / abalone

Research focus

(6)

What are the drivers to getting published?

• Publish or perish

– Government subsidy

– Student pass post graduate studies

– Staff promotion

– Department budget

– NRF rating

– Least publishable unit

• Publish internationally

– But work local

– Comments “of more value in a local journal”

• Publish in high impact journals

(7)

Own experience

Local

International

Exotic

Game / ostrich

26

42

Traditional

Cattle / sheep / pigs

/ poultry

18

14

Used a multi-

disciplinary

approach

(8)

Example

1. Hoffman, L.C., Kroucamp, M. & Manley. M. 2007. Meat quality characteristics of springbok (Antidorcas marsupialis). 1. Physical meat attributes as

influenced by age, gender and production region. Meat Science 76: 755-761. 2. Hoffman, L.C., Kroucamp, M. & Manley, M. 2007. Meat quality characteristics

of springbok (Antidorcas marsupialis) 2. Chemical composition as influenced by age, gender and production region. Meat Science 76: 762-767.

3. Hoffman, L.C., Kroucamp, M. & Manley, M. 2007. Meat quality characteristics of springbok (Antidorcas marsupialis) 3. Fatty acid composition as influenced by age, gender and production region. Meat Science 76: 768-773.

4. Hoffman, L.C., Kroucamp, M. & Manley, M. 2007. Meat quality characteristics of springbok (Antidorcas marsupialis) 4. Sensory meat evaluation as

(9)

A typical paper

• Introduction

• Material & Methods

• Results

• Discussion

• Conclusion

Start international significance,

end local

Local

But international standard

Local

International relevance

(10)

But that’s not all folks!

• If your work is not cited, then it is also of little

relevance

– Network ! Network!

– Use the reviewer system

– Use external examiners

– Make scientists aware of your work

(11)

So where are we going?

• Invitations to publish books

– Germany (thesis)

– India

• Open access journals

– Price?

– Impact? – track record

• African journals

• Too much information – know what is of value

Referenties

GERELATEERDE DOCUMENTEN

John Nicholson’s The Meat Fix (22 February) gives the impression that vegetarian and vegan diets are bad for your health?. Nothing could be further from

Traditionally Research focus Research focus Red Traditionally  Farmed species Exotic meat Production  activities Fresh  meat Meat Poultry Farmed Wild f l Wild fowl F d

Deze documentaire gaat over de bijdrage van de (intensieve) veehouderij aan de uitstoot van onder andere koolstofhoudende broeikasgassen.. In een publicatie van de Voedsel-

Deze bijdrage van het verkeer moet onderdeel zijn van de antropogene uitstoot en kan dus niet hoger zijn dan 13% van 6 à 8 Gt De bijdrage van de veehouderij is dan maximaal 18/13

To analyze whether the motives and direct ambivalence influence less future meat consumption, a regression of less future meat consumption on the ethical-,

› Of the different motives, the ethical motive positively influences less future meat consumption. › Direct ambivalence positively influences less future

In the control group, the product packaging was shown in its original state (i.e. without an eco-label). A total of 5 choice sets was shown to each respondent. It is

Hypotheses •   H1: Consumers prefer meat to meat subs<tutes •   H1a: Consumers prefer grass-fed beef to grain-fed beef •   H1b: Consumers prefer soy/lupine-based