RESEARCH POSTER PRESENTATION DESIGN © 2015
www.PosterPresentations.com
(—THIS SIDEBAR DOES NOT PRINT—)
D E S I G N G U I D E
This PowerPoint 2007 template produces a 36”x48”
presentation poster. You can use it to create your research
poster and save valuable time placing titles, subtitles, text,
and graphics.
We provide a series of online tutorials that will guide you
through the poster design process and answer your poster
production questions. To view our template tutorials, go online
to
PosterPresentations.com
and click on HELP DESK.
When you are ready to print your poster, go online to
PosterPresentations.com
Need assistance? Call us at
1.510.649.3001
Q U I C K S TA RT
Zoom in and out
As you work on your poster zoom in and out to the level that is more comfortable to you.
Go to VIEW > ZOOM.
Title, Authors, and Affiliations
Start designing your poster by adding the title, the names of the authors, and the affiliated institutions. You can type or paste text into the
provided boxes. The template will automatically adjust the size of your text to fit the title box. You can manually override this feature and
change the size of your text.
T I P : The font size of your title should be bigger than your name(s) and institution name(s).
Adding Logos / Seals
Most often, logos are added on each side of the title. You can insert a
logo by dragging and dropping it from your desktop, copy and paste or by going to INSERT > PICTURES. Logos taken from web sites are likely to be low quality when printed. Zoom it at 100% to see what the logo will look like on the final poster and make any necessary adjustments.
T I P : See if your school’s logo is available on our free poster templates page.
Photographs / Graphics
You can add images by dragging and dropping from your desktop, copy and paste, or by going to INSERT > PICTURES. Resize images
proportionally by holding down the SHIFT key and dragging one of the corner handles. For a professional-looking poster, do not distort your images by enlarging them disproportionally.
Image Quality Check
Zoom in and look at your images at 100% magnification. If they look good they will print well.
ORIGINAL DISTORTED Corner handles Good prin ti ng qua lit y Bad prin ti ng qua lit y
Q U I C K S TA RT ( c o n t . )
How to change the template color theme
You can easily change the color theme of your poster by going to the DESIGN menu, click on COLORS, and choose the color theme of your choice. You can also create your own color theme.
You can also manually change the color of your background by going to VIEW > SLIDE MASTER. After you finish working on the master be sure to go to VIEW > NORMAL to continue working on your poster.
How to add Text
The template comes with a number of pre-formatted placeholders for headers and text
blocks. You can add more blocks by copying and pasting the existing ones or by adding a text box from the HOME menu.
Text size
Adjust the size of your text based on how much content you have to present. The default template text offers a good starting point. Follow the conference requirements.
How to add Tables
To add a table from scratch go to the INSERT menu and click on TABLE. A drop-down box will help you select rows and columns.
You can also copy and a paste a table from Word or another PowerPoint document. A pasted table may need to be re-formatted by RIGHT-CLICK > FORMAT SHAPE, TEXT BOX, Margins.
Graphs / Charts
You can simply copy and paste charts and graphs from Excel or Word. Some reformatting may be required depending on how the original document has been created.
How to change the column configuration
RIGHT-CLICK on the poster background and select LAYOUT to see the
column options available for this template. The poster columns can also be customized on the Master. VIEW > MASTER.
How to remove the info bars
If you are working in PowerPoint for Windows and have finished your
poster, save as PDF and the bars will not be included. You can also delete them by going to VIEW > MASTER. On the Mac adjust the Page-Setup to match the Page-Setup in PowerPoint before you create a PDF. You can also delete them from the Slide Master.
Save your work
Save your template as a PowerPoint document. For printing, save as PowerPoint or “Print-quality” PDF.
Print your poster
When you are ready to have your poster printed go online to
PosterPresentations.com and click on the “Order Your Poster” button. Choose the poster type the best suits your needs and submit your order. If you submit a PowerPoint document you will be receiving a PDF proof for your approval prior to printing. If your order is placed and paid for
before noon, Pacific, Monday through Friday, your order will ship out that same day. Next day, Second day, Third day, and Free Ground services are offered. Go to PosterPresentations.com for more information.
Student discounts are available on our Facebook page. Go to PosterPresentations.com and click on the FB icon.
© 2015 PosterPresentations.com
2117 Fourth Street , Unit C
Berkeley CA 94710
posterpresenter@gmail.com
• The Kingdom of Saudi Arabia holds the world’s largest oil
reserves, is the world’s leading oil exporter, and has considerable
influence on the global economy. Canada has partnered with
Saudi Arabia, through its foreign policy, to promote regional and
international peace and security with counter-terrorism strategies.
1• Saudi Arabia is Canada’s largest two-way trading partner in the
Middle East.
1• Since 1993, “the Government of Canada has granted export
permits to General Dynamics Land Systems Canada (GDLS-C)
for the sale of 3,000 armed light armoured vehicles (LAVs),
associated weapon systems, spare parts and technical data to
Saudi Arabia.”
1• The Liberals approved a renewed version of this deal in April
2016 even though Saudi Arabia had been charged by human rights
groups with violations against their Shi’a minority population.
Introduction
The Question
Arguments to Support Granting the Permit
Arguments to Support Denying the Permit
Alternative potential explanation
Domestic economic incentives:
• Canadian sales of military goods since 1993 have amounted to
“$52.5 billion, 90% of these sales are from LAVs.”
1• General Dynamic Land Systems Canada (GDLS-C), based in
London Ont. makes “85% of its revenue from exports” and
approval of this deal aids in international investments in Canada
and keeps GDLS-C in the “network of suppliers.”
1• GDLS-C employs 2,100 Canadians in London Ont.
1• From a national defence and trade perspective, exporting LAVs
keeps and creates jobs for Canadians in Canada, boosts economy
and ensures a “strong viable defence industrial base in Canada”
promoting Canada’s defence industry.
1Conclusions
Although the Government has found arguments in favor of
renewing this deal with Saudi Arabia (it promotes domestic
economic incentives, supports a powerful ally in the Middle East
without having to send troops, and continues a long term
multilateral alliance between world powers in order to expand
security, trade and influence), it has not made a convincing
argument that the fourth criteria for allowing the sale, that of
protecting human rights, was met. Therefore, not only should
Canada not have allowed the sale, but by doing so using weak
justifications, the Liberal government has damaged its reputation
as a human rights defender.
Acknowledgements & References
I acknowledge and respect the Lkwungen-speaking peoples on whose traditional territory the University stands and the Songhees, Esquimalt and WSÁNEĆ peoples whose
relationships to this land is continuous and ongoing. I would also like to thank the
University of Victoria for this opportunity to investigate an interesting topic and a special thank you to my supervisor Dr. Carla Winston for guiding and encouraging this research.
1. Global Affairs Canada. 2016.
http://www.international.gc.ca/controls-controles/assets/pdfs/documents/Memorandum_for_Action-eng.pdf.
2. Global Affairs Canada.2017. “Export Controls Handbook.”
http://www.international.gc.ca/controls-controles/export-exportation/exp_ctr_handbook-manuel_ctr_exp-p2.aspx?lang=eng#a_1.
3. Dowding, Keith M. 2011. Encyclopedia of Power. 1st ed. Thousand Oaks, California: Sage.
4. Amnesty International. 2011, 2016, 2017.“Key Elements for Implementation of the Arms Trade Treaty (ATT).”
https://www.amnesty.org/en/documents/ac t30/129/2011/en/.
https://www.amnesty.ca/news/light-armed-vehicles-sold-saudi-arabia-could-make-canada-accomplice-human-rights-violations.
https://www.amnesty.org/en/countries/middle-east-and-north-africa/yemen/report-yemen/.
5. Musa, Shavana. 2017. “The Saudi-Led Coalition in Yemen, Arms Exports and Human Rights: Prevention Is Better Than Cure.” Journal of Conflict & Security Law, 433-462. Oxford University Press.
6. General Dynamics Annual Report. 2018. http://investorrelations.gd.com/financial-reports/annual-reports.
Although the Conservatives approved it initially, this renewed
deal does not fit within the supposedly liberal paradigm of
defending human rights. So why then has the Liberal
government approved it? Are the Liberals instead operating
within a realist paradigm in which state and international
security concerns override humanist principles?
Canada’s Objective and Export Control Requirements:
2
Department of Political Science, Research supported by Jamie Cassels Undergraduate Research Award
Sarah Jansen, March 7, 2018
Supervisor: Dr. Carla Winston
A “Liberal” Arms Deal? The Canadian Sale of LAVs to Saudi Arabia
The Deal
• The Kingdom of Saudi Arabia made a $15-billion contractual
agreement in 2014 under the Harper government. This contract is
legally binding and “the Government of Saudi Arabia may sue for
damages in the event of breach of contract.”
1• The GDLS-C “has never been denied a permit for any such export.”
Additionally, “Canada has sold thousands of LAVs to Saudi Arabia
since the 1990s.”
1• The Liberals have renewed an $11 billion deal by issuing export
permits over the next four years.
1• The permitting consultation process found that the export of LAVs
“is consistent with the Government of Canada’s overall foreign
policy and objectives for the country and the region concerned.”
1• In order to grant an export licence for the sale of arms to a foreign
government, several branches of government must “advise that
these proposed exports are consistent with Canada’s defence and
security interests.”
1Aftermath
In the news recently there have been talks by Foreign Affairs minister
Chrystia Freeland that Canada should ratify the ATT in order to
regulate exports to countries that violate human rights. The
government is also proposing two amendments to Bill C-47 on export
and import acts on licensing weapons.
1). Do not cause harm to Canada and its allies
• Theory: States are motivated to join alliances to add the power of other states to that of their own. This will help them counter threats they might face in the international system. During peacetime, alliances serve principally as
deterrents and conflict management devices.3
• Canada has a long standing defense relationship cemented after the threat of the Iraqi invasion of Kuwait. Canada, USA and EU allies have provided
support to Saudi Arabia to defend itself against Iran and other proxies.1 • Canada’s other allies have also encouraged “Saudi Arabia to acquire the
means to defend itself” in an unstable region.1
• Saudi Arabia is responding to the continued expansionist threats of Iraq and Iran. Support through LAVs help instead of troops if war does break out.
• Causal logic: Canada is not causing harm because it is actually supporting an ally and maintaining an alliance instead.
2). Does not undermine national or international security
• Theory: Liberalism suggests that non-state actors, such as terroristorganizations (i.e. ISIS), can disrupt national and international security because it acts as a direct threat to state sovereignty.
• The Department of Defence states, “Saudi Arabia is a key Western ally in the Middle East and supports international efforts to counter non-state actors such as ISIS in Iraq and Syria as well as counter instability in Yemen. The
acquisition of state-of-the-art armoured vehicles will assist Saudi Arabia in combating instability in the region, a goal which is consistent with Canada’s defence interests in the Middle East.”1
• This type of dual-use weaponry will not change the relative power balance in the Middle East, but will aid in national defence. So although Canada may be contributing to regional conflict, the threat to national and international
security needs to be quelled by state actors versus terrorist organizations. • So although Canada is contributing to regional conflicts, this is ultimately
meant to bolster international security, not undermine it.
3). Does not contribute to national or regional conflicts or
instability
• Theory: In an anarchical international system, powerful states such as Saudi Arabia must keep regional equilibrium and the balance of power, without attributing to the security dilemma.3
• Saudi Arabia is a key important and stable ally in a region “marred by instability, terrorism and conflict.”1
• Saudi Arabia is the “regional leader in promoting regional security and
stability against countering threats posed by Iranian regional expansion and growing domestic terrorist threats by ISIS from Iraq and Syria and countering
instability in Yemen and ongoing instabilities in neighbouring Bahrain.”1
• Although the use of these LAVs does not currently significantly disrupt power imbalances between Iran and Saudi Arabia, things could change depending on the outcome of the Yemeni conflict (which would indeed disrupt power
imbalances, as Yemen would now be allied to Iran).
4). Are not used to commit human rights violations
• Canada has signed (but not ratified) the global Arms Trade Treaty (ATT), which requires governments to “assess the risk of transferring arms,
ammunition or components to another country where they could be used to commit or facilitate serious violations of international humanitarian and human rights law.”4
• Minister Dion told Amnesty International that “Canada had the strongest control standards in the world concerning the trade of goods of a military nature.”4
• Canada “raises issues of concern when necessary.”1
• To the best of the department’s knowledge, “there has been no indication that equipment of Canadian origin, including LAVs, may have been used in acts contrary to International Humanitarian law.”1
• Additionally, Saudi Arabia has assured “an independent team of specialists to assess and verify incidents of civilian casualties and to issue clear and
objective reports of such incidents.”1
1). Do not cause harm to Canada and its allies
• In neglecting to support our allies with goods and equipment, Canada would lose an ally. However, in equipping Saudi Arabia with dual-use
weapons/internal balancing, Canada could become a target for ISIS and affiliates.
• Canada signed the Arms Trade Treaty (ATT) on April 2, 2013. Signing but not ratifying the Arms Trade Treaty keeps Canada in line with International law, however, going against the rules of this treaty can harm Canada’s
international reputation.5
• This alliance/external balancing could cause harm to Israel, which is an ally of the US, which is a principal ally of Canada.
2). Do not undermine national or international security.
• Supporting and aiding Saudi Arabia with LAVs could potentially makeCanada an ISIS target in the future, undermining Canadian national security. • National and international security can be strengthened “through the proper
regulation of the arms trade. With this, human rights should be more
comprehensively integrated into the way in which States assess transfers.”5
3). Does not contribute to national or regional conflicts or
instability
• The conflict has allowed terrorist organizations (ISIS, Al Qaeda) to breed
amidst the power vacuum created by the conflict especially in parts of Iraq and Syria.
• Due to conflict in Yemen, (proxy war between Iran and Saudi Arabia, Saudi
Arabia using LAVs against Iran and civilian infrastructure) there has been an influx of refugees moving into surrounding states, putting pressure on
governments to support non-citizens. This is a threat to human security and therefore can be a contributor to regional instability.
4). Are not used to commit human rights violations
• Canada knows about prevailing human rights issues in Saudi Arabia such as1
• Reported high number of executions • Suppression of political opposition • Application of corporal punishment
• Suppression of political of freedom of expression • Arbitrary arrest
• Ill-treatment of detainees
• Limitations on freedom of religion • Discrimination against women • Mistreatment of migrant workers
• The Government of Canada also released a 22 page document Human Rights report on Saudi Arabia in 2015 recording evidence of human rights
violations, as well as advisory reports from NGOs and other international governments.
• Global reputation as a hypocrite makes future efforts on human rights more difficult.
• Saudi Arabia is intentionally targeting civilians and attacking humanitarian organizations through the use of “aerial bombardment, indiscriminate
shelling, and the use of artillery rockets against civilian areas.”4
• Engaging in conflict is in a sense a human rights violation, therefore, using these vehicles in conflict means violating human rights with LAVs.
• The supplier of the LAVs, General Dynamics, have cutting-edge technologies and “modernize and increase the lethality of the vehicles” regularly.6
• Approval of this deal creates tensions with Canada’s foreign policy priorities as human rights defenders.
Bill Graveland/The Canadian Press. http://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/saudi-arabia-top-non-u-s-destination-for-canadian-arms-exports-federal-report-1.4172182.
CBC News: http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/manitoba/canadian-rifles-may-have-fallen-into-yemen-rebel-hands-likely-via-saudi-arabia-1.3455889..
http://www.mapsland.com/asia/saudi-arabia/detailed-political-map-of-middle-east-with-major-cities-2003.