UvA-DARE is a service provided by the library of the University of Amsterdam (https://dare.uva.nl)
UvA-DARE (Digital Academic Repository)
Systematic quality improvement in healthcare: clinical performance
measurement and registry-based feedback
van der Veer, S.N.
Publication date
2012
Link to publication
Citation for published version (APA):
van der Veer, S. N. (2012). Systematic quality improvement in healthcare: clinical
performance measurement and registry-based feedback.
General rights
It is not permitted to download or to forward/distribute the text or part of it without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), other than for strictly personal, individual use, unless the work is under an open content license (like Creative Commons).
Disclaimer/Complaints regulations
If you believe that digital publication of certain material infringes any of your rights or (privacy) interests, please let the Library know, stating your reasons. In case of a legitimate complaint, the Library will make the material inaccessible and/or remove it from the website. Please Ask the Library: https://uba.uva.nl/en/contact, or a letter to: Library of the University of Amsterdam, Secretariat, Singel 425, 1012 WP Amsterdam, The Netherlands. You will be contacted as soon as possible.
Table of contents
Chapter 1 General introduction and outline 5
Quality improvement strategies
Chapter 2 Quality improvement strategies to implement best practice in
routine delivery of renal replacement therapy 17
Clinical performance measurement - patient experience as an indicator
Chapter 3 Development and validation of an instrument to measure dialysis
patient experience 65
Chapter 4 Exploring the relationships between characteristics of dialysis patients
and their experience with care 83
Impact of registry-based feedback on clinical performance
Chapter 5 Performance feedback to healthcare professionals provided by
medical registries 105
Chapter 6 Development and evaluation of a tailored multifaceted registry-based
feedback strategy to improve the quality of intensive care 139 Chapter 7 The effect of a multifaceted feedback strategy on ICU patient
outcomes compared to registry-based feedback reports alone 159 Chapter 8 Factors influencing the impact of multifaceted registry-based
feedback on the quality of intensive care 177
Chapter 9 General discussion 193
Summary 207
Samenvatting (Dutch summary) 213
Dankwoord (Acknowledgements) 221
Curriculum vitae 225
