• No results found

Limitations of current antiretroviral therapy in HIV-1 infection: the search for new strategies - CHAPTER 3 Limited penetration of lopinavir into seminal plasma of HIV-1-infected men

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "Limitations of current antiretroviral therapy in HIV-1 infection: the search for new strategies - CHAPTER 3 Limited penetration of lopinavir into seminal plasma of HIV-1-infected men"

Copied!
9
0
0

Bezig met laden.... (Bekijk nu de volledige tekst)

Hele tekst

(1)

UvA-DARE is a service provided by the library of the University of Amsterdam (https://dare.uva.nl)

UvA-DARE (Digital Academic Repository)

Limitations of current antiretroviral therapy in HIV-1 infection: the search for new

strategies

Sankatsing, S.U.C.

Publication date

2004

Link to publication

Citation for published version (APA):

Sankatsing, S. U. C. (2004). Limitations of current antiretroviral therapy in HIV-1 infection: the

search for new strategies.

General rights

It is not permitted to download or to forward/distribute the text or part of it without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), other than for strictly personal, individual use, unless the work is under an open content license (like Creative Commons).

Disclaimer/Complaints regulations

If you believe that digital publication of certain material infringes any of your rights or (privacy) interests, please let the Library know, stating your reasons. In case of a legitimate complaint, the Library will make the material inaccessible and/or remove it from the website. Please Ask the Library: https://uba.uva.nl/en/contact, or a letter to: Library of the University of Amsterdam, Secretariat, Singel 425, 1012 WP Amsterdam, The Netherlands. You will be contacted as soon as possible.

(2)

CHAPTERR 3

Limitedd penetration of lopinavir into seminal

plasmaa of HIV-1-infected men

S.U.C.. Sankatsing, J. Droste, D.M. Burger, R.M.E. van Praag, S.. Jurriaans, J.M.A.. Lange, J.M. Prins

(3)
(4)

LopinavirLopinavir in semen

Antiretrovirall therapy can decrease the amount of HIV-1 RNA in blood plasma andd in semen 1. However, the decline of the HIV-1 RNA concentration and the evolutionn of virus in semen during therapy can show discordance with blood plasma,, indicating viral compartmentalization 2>3. Poor penetration into the malee genital tract by some antiretroviral drugs can contribute to the different virall dynamics in this compartment4. Data available on drug concentrations in semenn show that the penetration of the protease inhibitors (Pis) nelfinavir, ritonavirr and saquinavir is poor 5. The nucleoside analogues zidovudine, stavudine,, lamivudine and abacavir, the non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitorss nevirapine and efavirenz and the PI indinavir and amprenavir penetratee well into the male genital tract 3-6"12. There are no data on the penetrationn of the PI lopinavir into the male genital tract.

HIV-11 infected men who were on a lopinavir-containing regimen for a minimumm of 4 weeks were recruited from our HIV outpatient clinic. The patientss had to have no signs or symptoms of a genital infection. Semen sampless were obtained by masturbation, centrifuged between 2 and 4 hours afterr collection at 1200 g for 10 minutes to obtain seminal plasma and stored att -70 C until analysis. Within 2 hours after semen collection, a blood sample wass taken for the measurement of the blood plasma lopinavir and HIV-1 RNA concentrations.. The local Medical Ethics Committee approved the study, and writtenn informed consent was obtained from all patients.

HIV-11 RNA in ethylenediamine tetraacetic acid plasma was measured using thee quantiplex bDNA assay (Bayer Corporation, Diagnostics Division, Emeryville,, CA, USA), with a lower limit of quantification of 50 copies/mL. HIV-11 RNA in seminal plasma was measured using the ultra Nuclisens HIV-1 QT assayy (Organon Teknika, Boxtel, the Netherlands), with a lower limit of quantificationn of 50 copies/mL. Lopinavir concentrations in heparinized blood plasmaa and in seminal plasma were measured using a high-performance liquidd chromatographic procedure 13. The intra- and interday variation of this assayy was less than 5%.

(5)

ChapterChapter 3

Fourteenn patients on a lopinavir-containing regimen for a median of 16 weeks (rangee 4 - 4 1 weeks) were included in this study. Lopinavir was started in nine off the patients because of virological failure on their previous antiretroviral regimenn and in five because of side effects of their previous regimen. The five patientss who switched therapy because of side effects had an undetectable HIV-11 RNA level in blood plasma at the moment of switching therapy. At the timee the study samples were taken all five patients still had an undetectable HIV-11 RNA level in blood plasma and an undetectable HIV-1 RNA level in seminall plasma. Of the nine patients starting lopinavir because of virological failure,, four had a detectable HIV-1 RNA level in blood plasma at the time the studyy samples were taken. These patients were not yet in a steady state and duringg follow-up their blood plasma HIV-1 RNA levels decreased further. Only onee of these four patients had an undetectable HIV-1 RNA in seminal plasma. Thee other five patients starting lopinavir because of virological failure had an undetectablee blood plasma HtV-1 RNA level. One of these patients had a detectablee HIV-1 RNA level in seminal plasma.

Inn five of the fourteen patients the blood plasma concentration of lopinavir was beloww the desired concentration of 5.0 mg/L (Abbott product information). The otherr nine patients had a plasma concentration greater than 5.0 mg/L (Figure 1a). .

Thee lopinavir concentration in seminal plasma ranged between 0.046 and 3.9 mg/LL (median 0.23 mg/L, IQR 0.15-0.33). No relationship was found between thee lopinavir concentration in seminal plasma and the time since medication intakee (p = 0.22, P=0.45; Spearman's rank)(Figure 1b). There was a weak relationshipp between the blood plasma and the seminal plasma concentration (pp = 0.51, P=0.07;Spearman's rank). The median ratio of the concentrations of lopinavirr in seminal plasma and in blood plasma was only 0.034 (IQR 0.021-0.070)(Figuree 1c). There was no relationship between the lopinavir concentrationn in blood plasma or in seminal plasma and HIV-1 RNA level in bloodd plasma or in seminal plasma (p =0.11, P=0.73; Spearman's rank)(figure 1aa and b) and no relationship between the lopinavir concentration in seminal

(6)

LopinavirLopinavir in semen

Figuree 1 Lopinavir concentrations in (a) blood plasma and (b) seminal plasma versus

timee after medication intake

1 1

E E Figuree 1 a

desiredd concentration

Timee after medication intake (hours)

Figuree 1 b

desiredd concentration

Timee after medication intake (hours)

Figuree 1 c 0.25-- 0.20--rO O 11 0.15-

0.10--Timee after medication intake (hours)

Openn circles: detectable HIV-1 RNA levels in blood and seminal plasma. Closed circles: undetectablee HIV-1 RNA levels in blood and seminal plasma, (c) ratio of the concentration of lopinavirr in seminal and blood plasma.

(7)

ChapterChapter 3

plasmaa and HIV-1 RNA level in seminal plasma (p=0.46, P= 0.11; Spearman's rank). rank).

Wee demonstrated here that lopinavir has a poor penetration into the seminal plasma,, with a median concentration of only 0.23 mg/L (range 0.046 - 3.9 mg/L),, assuming the same percentage protein binding in seminal plasma as in bloodd plasma (98-99%; Abbott product information). Because of this poor penetrationn one would expect a poor suppression of the viral replication in semen.. However, only four out of the fourteen patients had a detectable HIV-1 RNAA level in seminal plasma of which three patients were not yet in a steady state.. An explanation for this could be that ail patients were on a regimen containingg at least one other antiretroviral drug with a good penetration into thee seminal plasma (data not shown). It is, however conceivable that the replicationn of HIV-1 in genital tracts of our patients is only partially suppressed byy the other drugs of the regimen, usually two nucleoside analogues. Althoughh most of the patients had an undetectable HIV-1 RNA level in seminal plasma,, the median time on lopinavir was only 16 weeks, and it is possible thatt in time there will be a selection of HIV-1 strains resistant for the other drugss used. There are indications that the selection of resistant HIV-1 strains inn the male genital tract can differ from that in blood plasma 14. If resistant HIV strainss migrate to other compartments a patient is at risk for systemic virologicall failure. Resistant strains in seminal plasma may also lead to the infectionn of other individuals with resistant strains. A longer follow-up of HIV-1 RNAA levels in seminal plasma is necessary to be confident that selection of resistancee mutations is not a risk of regimens with only partial penetration into thee male genital tract.

Acknowledgments s

Thiss study was financially supported by a foundation that does not wish to be named. .

(8)

LopinavirLopinavir in semen

References s

1.. Vernazza PL, Troiani L, Ftepp MJ et al. Potent antiretroviral treatment of

HIV-infectionn results in suppression of the seminal shedding of HIV. The Swiss HIVV Cohort Study. AIDS. 2000;14:117-121.

2.. Eron JJ, Vernazza PL, Johnston DM et al. Resistance of HIV-1 to antiretrovirall agents in blood and seminal plasma: implications for transmission.. AIDS. 1998;12:F181-F189.

3.. Eron JJ, Smeaton LM, Fiscus SA et al. The effects of protease inhibitor therapyy on human immunodeficiency virus type 1 levels in semen (AIDS clinicall trials group protocol 850). J Infect Dis. 2000; 181:1622-1628.

4.. Kashuba AD, Dyer JR, Kramer LM et al. Antiretroviral-drug concentrations in semen:: implications for sexual transmission of human immunodeficiency virus typee 1. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1999;43:1817-1826.

5.. Taylor S, Back DJ, Workman J et al. Poor penetration of the male genital tract byy HIV-1 protease inhibitors. AIDS. 1999;13:859-860.

6.. van Praag RM, Repping S, de Vries JW et al. Pharmacokinetic profiles of nevirapinee and indinavir in various fractions of seminal plasma. Antimicrob

AgentsAgents Chemother. 2001 ;45:2902-2907.

7.. Taylor S, Reynolds H, Sabin CA et al. Penetration of efavirenz into the male genitall tract: drug concentrations and antiviral activity in semen and blood of HIV-1-infectedd men. AIDS. 2001;15:2051-2053.

8.. van Praag RM, van Heeswijk RP, Jurriaans S et al. Penetration of the Nucleosidee Analogue Abacavir into the Genital Tract of Men Infected with Humann Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1. Clin Infect Dis. 2001;33:E91-E92. 9.. Henry K, Chinnock BJ, Quinn RP et al. Concurrent zidovudine levels in

semenn and serum determined by radioimmunoassay in patients with AIDS or AIDS-relatedd complex. JAMA. 1988;259:3023-3026.

10.. Pereira AS, Kashuba AD, Fiscus SA et al. Nucleoside analogues achieve highh concentrations in seminal plasma: relationship between drug concentrationn and virus burden. J Infect Dis. 1999;180:2039-2043.

11.. Taylor S, van Heeswijk RP, Hoetelmans RM et al. Concentrations of nevirapine,, lamivudine and stavudine in semen of HIV-1-infected men. AIDS. 2000;14:1979-1984. .

12.. van Praag RM, Weverling GJ, Portegies P et al. Enhanced penetration of indinavirr in cerebrospinal fluid and semen after the addition of low-dose ritonavir.. AIDS. 2000;14:1187-1194.

(9)

ChapterChapter 3

13.. Hugen PW, Verweij-van Wissen CP, Burger DM et al. Simultaneous determinationn of the HIV-protease inhibitors indinavir, nelfinavir, saquinavir andd ritonavir in human plasma by reversed-phase high-performance liquid chromatography.. J Chromatogr B Biomed Sci Appl. 1999;727:139-149. 14.. Eyre RC, Zheng G, Kiessling AA. Multiple drug resistance mutations in

humann immunodeficiency virus in semen but not blood of a man on antiretrovirall therapy. Urology. 2000;55:591.

Referenties

GERELATEERDE DOCUMENTEN

party is centrist. “Voluntary” is a dummy variable that is 1 if voting is voluntary. Standard errors given in brackets are clustered at the matching group level. For the

therefore evaluate it at most left-wing entry position possible since this leads to the most favorable outcome for the entrant. Therefore no extreme candidate will enter to

Comparing entry rates across electoral rules I find that the higher entry rates under proportional representation compared to plurality rule when the costs of entry are low are

Furthermore, player 3 shows a lower probability of accepting the middle option when payoffs are asymmetric but this effect is not significant (p-value: 0.23 when probabilities

Der Mechanismus, welcher diesem Effekt zu Grunde liegt ist, dass, wenn es eine Möglichkeit gibt der Wahl fern zu bleiben, die Unterstützer extremer Parteien seltener aus

The analysis in the 2002 KPMG Survey of Corporate Responsibility Reporting (2002, p.18) suggests that the increased adoption of sustainability assurance arises from “…the demand

Smithson and Foucault are writing, of course, from different positions and with different purposes; nonetheless this coincidence of terminology offers an opportunity to consider to