• No results found

Shared decision-making in palliative cancer care: a life span perspective

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "Shared decision-making in palliative cancer care: a life span perspective"

Copied!
2
0
0

Bezig met laden.... (Bekijk nu de volledige tekst)

Hele tekst

(1)
(2)

Oral Presentations

Back to Contents

EHPS/DHP 2016 - Conference Abstracts

Page

| 120

11:45 - 12:00

Shared decision-making in palliative cancer care: a life span

perspective

C. Groot Kormelinck1, C. Bode1, C. Drossaert1, M. Wymenga2 1University of Twente, Netherlands

2Medisch Spectrum Twente, Netherlands

Background: Due to complex treatment decisions, shared decision-making is advocated for in elderly cancer patients and in palliative cancer care. However, the process of (shared) decision-making is not comprehensively understood in these groups. Studies suggest

age-level of preferences and actual involvement. Methods:

(40-64 years), - - -sectional

preferences (CPS), perceived involvement (PICS), level of information (decisional conflict scale) and selfefficacy in patient-physician interaction (PEPPI), health-related quality of life (EORTC QLQ-C30), loneliness and temporal perspective (TFS) as potential correlates.

Findings:

do not differ between age groups. A majority of patients preferred and perceived to be involved in decision-making. Nearly 20% of patients was less involved than preferred. Age related factors were not related to perceived and preferred

decision-encouraged by their oncologist to talk about worries. Shared decision-making was more often perceived by women than men and was associated with higher levels of self-efficacy in communication with oncologists.

Discussion: Age-related differences with regard to decision making preferences and perceived participation seemed to be cancelled out in palliative cancer care, probably due to near-to-death perception. If clinical practice aims to

involvement should be explicitly discussed. -social

Referenties

GERELATEERDE DOCUMENTEN

ongoing longitudinal study into the prevalence and impact of personality pathology in later life, the SPAN study (St. Louis Personality and Aging Network), included patients between

ABSTRACT: If a partially mobile sediment is transported an immobile sediment layer can form below the bedforms. This immobile layer can cause a supply-limitation, i.e. the volume

In contrast to the patients’ rated outcome parameters, the clinicians in the intervention group reported a significantly better working alliance and experienced more agreement

HRQoL at baseline did not predict treatment choice, but pa- tients who chose a curative treatment instead of AS reported more symptoms and reduced functioning compared to patients

The recently published outcomes of our pragmatic cluster randomized ROGY Care trial among 221 endometrial cancer patients revealed that patients in the SCP care arm reported

Although previous results of SDM in mental health care are promising, few studies have been conducted in this sector [2, 6]. Integrating systematic clinical feedback de- rived from

Title Shared Decision-Making in Prostate Cancer Care: Encouraging every patient to be actively involved in decision-making, or ensuring patients’ preferred level of

Purpose To investigate the effects of Shared Decision-Making (SDM) using Routine Outcome Monitoring (ROM) primary on patients’ perception of Decisional Conflict (DC), which