• No results found

Density fluctuations in the 1D Bose gas - B: Special functions and their properties

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "Density fluctuations in the 1D Bose gas - B: Special functions and their properties"

Copied!
4
0
0

Bezig met laden.... (Bekijk nu de volledige tekst)

Hele tekst

(1)

UvA-DARE is a service provided by the library of the University of Amsterdam (https://dare.uva.nl)

UvA-DARE (Digital Academic Repository)

Density fluctuations in the 1D Bose gas

Panfil, M.K.

Publication date

2013

Link to publication

Citation for published version (APA):

Panfil, M. K. (2013). Density fluctuations in the 1D Bose gas.

General rights

It is not permitted to download or to forward/distribute the text or part of it without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), other than for strictly personal, individual use, unless the work is under an open content license (like Creative Commons).

Disclaimer/Complaints regulations

If you believe that digital publication of certain material infringes any of your rights or (privacy) interests, please let the Library know, stating your reasons. In case of a legitimate complaint, the Library will make the material inaccessible and/or remove it from the website. Please Ask the Library: https://uba.uva.nl/en/contact, or a letter to: Library of the University of Amsterdam, Secretariat, Singel 425, 1012 WP Amsterdam, The Netherlands. You will be contacted as soon as possible.

(2)

Appendix B

Special Functions and their

Properties

Gamma Function

We follow the usual definition of Gamma function Γ(x)

Γ(z) = Z ∞

0

dt tz−1e−t, z∈ C/{. . . , −2, −1, 0}, (B.1)

with its almost defining properties

Γ(1) = 1, (B.2) Γ(z + 1) = zΓ(z). (B.3)

Values ofΓ(x) at large integer arguments follows the Stirling approximation

log (Γ(n)) =  n− 1 2  log(n)− n +1 2log(2π) +O(1/n). (B.4)

Γ-function can also be used to express the following integrals Z ∞ 0 dz z x−1 ez− 1 = Z ∞ 0 dz zx−1e−z 1− e−z−1= Z ∞ 0 dz zx−1e−z ∞ X k=0 e−kz = Z ∞ 0 dz zx−1e−z× ∞ X k=1 1 kx = Γ(x)× ∞ X k=1 1 kx. (B.5) 139

(3)

Appendix B. Special Functions 140

The infinite summation is equal to the Riemann ζ function

∞ X k=1 1 kx = ζ(x). (B.6) Therefore Z ∞ 0 dz z x−1 ez+ 1 = Γ(x)ζ(x). (B.7)

For the case considered in Chapter 1we need the following values of Γ and ζ functions

Γ(3/2) =√π/2, ζ(3/2)≈ 2.61. (B.8)

Barnes Function

We define the BarnesG(x) function through the following relations

G(1 + m + a) G(1 + a) = m Y i=1 Γ(i + a), (B.9) G(1) = 1. (B.10)

BarnesG function also admits Stirling like approximation for large integer arguments

log (G(n + 1)) = n 2 2 log(n)− 3 4n 2+n 2 log(2π)− 1 12log(n) + ζ 0( −1) + O(1/n), (B.11)

whereζ0(x) is the derivative of Riemann ζ(x) function. The Barnes G function fulfills a special property

G(1− z) G(1 + z) = (2π) −zexpZ z 0 dx πx cot(πx)  . (B.12)

This property allows for a simplification in computation of the themodynamic limit of the form factor in Chapter4. Consider the following expression and its transformation

exp Z q −q dλ πF (λ)F0(λ) cot(πF (λ)  = exp Z F (q) F (−q) dx πx cot(πx) ! = G(1− F (q))G(1 + F (−q)) G(1 + F (q))G(1− F (−q))(2π) F (q)−F (−q) . (B.13)

(4)

Appendix B. Special Functions 141

Thus the following idenity follows

G(1 + F (q))G(1− F (−q)) exp Z q −q dλ πF (λ)F0(λ) cot(πF (λ)  = = G(1 + F (−q))G(1 − F (q)) (2π)F (q)−F (−q). (B.14)

Referenties

GERELATEERDE DOCUMENTEN

Topographic maps for LI (left) and HI (right), at Pz, for No-Go trials in the Go/No-Go task. Visual representation of one trial in the SSRT. a blue circle) on Go trials (75%

Stopping the “World’s Greatest Threat”: Canadian Policy and Rhetoric towards the Iranian Nuclear Program during Stephen Harper’s Conservative Government, 2006-2015.. by

I think joy, and like, you know, just taking care of yourself and the people around you is really important to this work because we’re in it for the long haul. we have to take care

German’s report, the Corporate Registration program plays a key role in GPEB’s regulatory framework, and is a principal mechanism through which GPEB maintains control over

Britton (1997) concluded that race and gender are contributing factors in stress and further identified the need for future researchers to explore how these intersections

These structural investigations into the mechanism for germ-line antibody recognition of carbohydrate antigens utilizing chlamydial-specific and anti-lipid A antibodies

Our structural analysis revealed that while the N- terminal region of TbFam50.360 adopted a three-helical structure similar to previously characterized trypanosome surface

I showed that data on the structural differences between the native and aggregated forms of the prion protein, obtained from multiple structural proteomics approaches