University of Groningen
Pseudo-wound infection after a caesarean section
van Donkelaar, Carlina E.; de Haan, Johanna M. H.; Lange, Johan F. M.; de Vries, Marjolijn;
Horvath, Barbara
Published in:
International journal of surgery case reports
DOI:
10.1016/j.ijscr.2020.03.041
IMPORTANT NOTE: You are advised to consult the publisher's version (publisher's PDF) if you wish to cite from
it. Please check the document version below.
Document Version
Publisher's PDF, also known as Version of record
Publication date:
2020
Link to publication in University of Groningen/UMCG research database
Citation for published version (APA):
van Donkelaar, C. E., de Haan, J. M. H., Lange, J. F. M., de Vries, M., & Horvath, B. (2020).
Pseudo-wound infection after a caesarean section: Case report of unrecognized Pyoderma Gangrenosum.
International journal of surgery case reports, 69, 79-82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijscr.2020.03.041
Copyright
Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download or to forward/distribute the text or part of it without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license (like Creative Commons).
Take-down policy
If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact us providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim.
Downloaded from the University of Groningen/UMCG research database (Pure): http://www.rug.nl/research/portal. For technical reasons the number of authors shown on this cover page is limited to 10 maximum.
ContentslistsavailableatScienceDirect
International
Journal
of
Surgery
Case
Reports
j o u r n al ho m e p a g e :w w w . c a s e r e p o r t s . c o mPseudo-wound
infection
after
a
caesarean
section:
Case
report
of
unrecognized
Pyoderma
Gangrenosum
Carlina
E.
van
Donkelaar
a,∗,1,
Johanna
M.H.
de
Haan
b,1,
Johan
F.M.
Lange
b,
Marjolijn
de
Vries
a,
Barbara
Horváth
caDepartmentofObstetricsandGynecology,ZiekenhuisgroepTwente,Almelo,theNetherlands bDepartmentofSurgery,UniversityMedicalCenterGroningen,Groningen,theNetherlands cDepartmentofDermatology,UniversityMedicalCenterGroningen,Groningen,theNetherlands
a
r
t
i
c
l
e
i
n
f
o
Articlehistory:
Received19February2020
Receivedinrevisedform15March2020 Accepted19March2020
Availableonline13April2020
Keywords:
Pyodermagangrenosum Abdominalnecrosis Caesareansection
a
b
s
t
r
a
c
t
BACKGROUND:Pyoderma Gangrenosum(PG) is arareauto-inflammatory disease, characterizedby
painfululcerativeskin-lesionsoftendevelopingatsitesofinjuryorsurgerybecauseofthetypicalpathergy
phenomena.WedescribeanunusualcaseofPGafteracaesareansectionwithexcessiveextra-cutaneous
manifestationwithininternalorgans.
PRESENTATIONOFCASE:A21-year-oldDutchprimigravidadevelopedsignsofsepsisafteracaesarean
sec-tion.Despiteantibiotictreatment,fastclinicaldeteriorationoccurred.Explorationofthewoundshowed
necrosisoftheuterusandsurroundingtissues.Duetotheprogressionofnecrosis,consecutive
debride-mentprocedureswereexecutedresultinginasubstantialabdominalwalldefect.Theprogressiveclinical
courseofthenecrosiscombinedwithabsenceofpositivewoundculturesandhistologyofprominent
interstitialneutrophilicinfiltration,ledtothediagnosis‘PyodermaGangrenosum’.Treatmentwithhigh
dosecorticosteroidsledtorapidregressionofthedisease.Afterseveralweeks,theabdominalwalldefect
wassurgicallycorrectedundersystemiccorticosteroidtherapy.
DISCUSSION:ThiscaseofPGisuniqueduetotheexcessiveextra-cutaneouspresentation,which
con-tributedtodelayeddiagnosis.Severalsurgicalinterventionsintheactivestageofdiseaseresultedin
expansionofPGandsubstantialmorbidityforthepatient.
CONCLUSION:Post-operativePGcanmimicinfectiousdiseases,buttreatmentissubstantiallydifferent.
ThiscaseofextensivePGhighlightstheimportanceoftimelyrecognitionandtreatmentofthedisease
toreduceiatrogenicmorbidity.
©2020TheAuthor(s).PublishedbyElsevierLtdonbehalfofIJSPublishingGroupLtd.Thisisanopen
accessarticleundertheCCBYlicense(http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
1. Introduction
PyodermaGangrenosum(PG)isarareneutrophilicdermatosis, closelyrelatedtoauto-inflammatorydiseases.Theincidencerate isapproximately3–10patientspermillionperyear,withapeak incidencebetween20and50yearsandwomenmorecommonly affected[1,2].
Typically,PGlesionsdevelopatsitesofinjurycausedbytrauma orsurgery,alsoknownasthepathergy phenomena.Duetothe highinflammatory load,PGis oftenmistakenfor severe bacte-rialinfection,suchasnecrotizingfasciitis.Limitedknowledgeof
Abbreviations: C-section,caesareansection;NPWT,negativepressurewound therapy;PG,PyodermaGangrenosum.
∗ Correspondingauthorat:ZiekenhuisgroepTwente,DepartmentofObstetrics andGynecology,Zilvermeeuw1,7609PPAlmelo,theNetherlands.
E-mailaddress:c.e.van.donkelaar@umcg.nl(C.E.vanDonkelaar).
1 Bothauthorscontributedequally.
PGamongstphysicians,otherthandermatologists,contributesto delayeddiagnosisandtreatment.
WedescribeanatypicalcaseofPGafteracaesareansection (C-section)withextra-cutaneousinvolvementaffectingtheinternal organs,inwhichdelayeddiagnosisattributedtoiatrogenic dam-ageandahighmorbidityofthedisease.Thiscase-reporthasbeen reportedinlinewiththeSCAREcriteria[3].
2. Case
The21-year old patientunderwent anuncomplicated emer-gencyC-sectionat32+1weeksduetopretermlaborandbreech position.Thepregnancywasuncomplicatedsofar,andher medi-calhistoryreportednorelevantinformation.Twodayspostpartum, shedevelopedfever(39.5 degreesCelsius)incombination with increasedCRPof236(normalvalue<10)andleukocytosis(35.9 109/L,normalvalue4–10×109/L).Physicalexaminationrevealed
paininthelowerabdominalregionwithanenlargeduterus. Ultra-soundexcludedretainedplacentalfragment.Antibiotictreatment
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijscr.2020.03.041
2210-2612/©2020TheAuthor(s).PublishedbyElsevierLtdonbehalfofIJSPublishingGroupLtd.ThisisanopenaccessarticleundertheCCBYlicense(http://creativecommons. org/licenses/by/4.0/).
80 C.E.vanDonkelaaretal./InternationalJournalofSurgeryCaseReports69(2020)79–82
Fig.1. A:TheC-sectionwoundwithpustularedgesandviolaceousborders(7th daypostpartum).B:Theabdominalwounddehiscenceaftermultipledebridement’s (19thdaypostpartum).Woundedgesareviolaceouswithapustularbullaonthe lowerrightabdomen,surroundedbydiffuseerythema.
wasstarted under the diagnosis of endometritis. Multiple
cul-tures(blood,woundandvaginal)remainednegative.On5thday
postpartum,theC-sectionwoundshowedpurulentdischargeand
wounddehiscence. Partial openingof thewound confirmedan
intactabdominalfascia(Fig.1a).Woundtherapywasstartedand
antibiotictreatmentcontinued.
Lack of clinical improvement necessitated a CT-scan which revealeddiscolorationoftheanterioruteruswall,suspectfor necro-sis.Soonafterwards,thepatientdevelopedsystemicinflammatory responsesyndromewithacutekidneyfailure.Treatmentwas initi-atedaccordingtothesepsisprotocolandshewasadmittedtothe intensivecareunit(ICU).Exploratory laparotomyshowed puru-lentnecrotic tissueontheloweruterinesegmentoftheuterus (betweentheuterusandbladder),alongtheabdominalmuscles, andtheretroperitonealtissuesurroundingtheureters.Extensive debridementwasperformed.Duetonecrosisprogressiontwo addi-tionallaparotomieswithdebridement wereperformed.Still,all bloodandwoundculturesremainedfreeofmeaningfulpathogens. Additional serology blood tests ruled out human immunodefi-ciencyvirus,syphilisandsystemiclupuserythematosus.On19th daypost-partum,theabdominalwoundedgesonceagainshowed dehiscencewithsignsofnecrosis(Fig.1b).Afterthethird debride-ment, a negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) systemwas appliedtocovertheabdominalwalldefect.Additionally,two para-colicdrainswereplacedintra-abdominally.
Thecomplexityofthecaseandprogressionofillnessrequired transfer to an academic hospital (20 days postpartum). Explo-rative laparotomy showed a substantial abdominal wall defect withnecroticwoundedgeswhichweredebrided.Anew NPWT-systemwasplacedonthewound.Thedrainentrywoundsshowed nosignsofinflammation(Fig.2a).However,twodayslater,the drainentrywoundsshowednewlyformedpurulentulcers(Fig.2b), whichwerenotrelatedtothenecrotictissuearoundthe abdomi-nalwound.Adermatologistwasconsultedandbiopsiesweretaken, showingprominentinterstitialneutrophilicinfiltrationwitha
dif-Fig.2.A:TheabdominalwoundwithNPWT-systeminsitu(20thdaypostpartum). B:Newulcerationaroundtheleftandrightparacolicdrainsisvisible(22ndday postpartum).
ferential diagnosis of infection, Sweet’s syndrome and PG. The combinationoftheclinicalcourse,progressionundersurgicaland antibiotictreatmentandabsenceofmeaningfulpathogensinthe cultures,ledtothediagnosisofPG.
Immediatetreatmentwithhigh-dosesystemiccorticosteroids (Prednisolone1mg/kg)ledtorapidclinicalimprovement. Treat-mentwaslaterexpandedwithaT-cellinhibitor(Cyclosporine-A 5mg/kg), and the corticosteroid dose reduced. Twelve weeks’ post-partum, the patient underwent abdominoplasty (Fig. 3) underimmunosuppressivetreatment.Immunosuppressive treat-ment wastapered off over several monthsand hassince been stopped.Severalfollow-upshaveshowednosignsofre-activation ofPG.
3. Discussion
TheexactunderlyingpathophysiologyofPGisunknown,but involvesdysregulationoftheimmuneresponse.Patientshave sig-nificantoverexpressionofcytokinesandchemokines,andthereis evidenceofgenemutationsinseveralauto-inflammatorygenes [1].Morethan50%ofthepatientshaveanassociatedsystemic
dis-Fig.3.Theabdomenafterabdominoplasty,3monthspostpartum.
ease,mostcommonlyinflammatoryboweldisease(Crohn’sDisease
andColitisUlcerosa).Otherrelateddiseasesarearthritisand
spe-cifichematologicalmalignancies[1,2].Inthispatient,athorough
work-upforassociatedconditionsremainednegative.
Although diagnostic criteria have been proposed by Maver-akisetal.[2],PGremainsdifficulttodiagnose.Thetypicalskin lesionofthissubtypeisapainfululceratingwoundwitha viola-ceous,elevated/underminedborder,oftenprogressivelyspreading peripherally.The lesionsareaccompanied byspikingfever and general malaise and laboratory findings include high CRP and leukocytosis[1,4].
PGdevelopsin25–50%ofthecasesaftersurgeryortraumatothe skinduetoneutrophilactivation,theso-calledpathergyphenomen [3,4].PGisoftendescribedafterbowelsurgery(mostcommonly locatedparastomal)and breastsurgery [1,5], butrarelyafter C-sections.Interestingly,manyofthecasesdescribedinliterature, reportaprematureC-sectionduetopretermlabororsuspected fetaldistress[6–10].AnassociationwithPGandprematuredelivery hasnotyetbeenestablished.
PGaftersurgeryisoftenmistakenforabacterialwoundinfection withsubsequentdelayinappropriatetreatment.Inacase-seriesof 36PGpatients,29patientsweremisdiagnosedaswoundinfection and13patientsreceiveddebridementofthelesions[11]. Remark-ableinthiscase,isthatthePGappearedlargelyintra-abdominal insteadofintra-cutaneous, whichincreasedthesuspicion ofan infectiousdiseasesuchasnecrotizingfasciitis,andfurtherdelayed diagnosis.Extra-cutaneousmanifestation ofPGis rare,a recent reviewreported96casesdescribedbetween1973and2018[12].Of thesecases,pulmonarymanifestationwasthemostcommon,but genitalandcervicalmanifestationsofPGhavealsobeenreported. Therehavebeennopreviousreportssuggestinguterine manifes-tationof PG,sothis case maybe thefirst,although it remains difficulttodetermineifthePGwasactuallyinitiatedintra-uterine, orwhetheritexpandedfromtheskinintotheinternalorgans.
TreatmentofPGisbasedonlocalorsystemicimmune suppres-sion,dependingontheclinicalcourse[1].Forsystemictreatment, high-doseprednisone is thepreferredchoice,withrapideffect. Surgerywithactive PGmustbeavoided asaggravates the sur-roundingtissueandleadstoPGprogression[1].Inthiscase,the extensiveabdominaldebridement’sduringtheactivephaseofthe diseasemightcontributedtothedestructivecourse.
Afterthediagnosis,theNPWT-systemwassuccessfullyusedto bridgetheperiodofactivePGandafterthePGwasstabilized,the abdomencouldbeclosed.NPWTunderimmunesuppressionisno routinetreatmentofPGwounds,butafewdescribedcasespresent successfuluseintreatmentofdeeptissuewoundsrelatedtoPG [13].NPWTisknownforincreasingtissueperfusion,enhancing cel-lularproliferation,andreducingbacterialload[14].Furthermore, incaseofPGitseemstoresultinsignificantpainreduction[13].
Long-termoutcomeofpatientswithPGremainsunpredictable, even after effective treatment. Recurrence rates upto 70% are described, but are based on small numbers of patients [4]. In patientswithahistoryofPG,prophylacticadministrationof peri-operativeimmunosuppressivetherapyisrecommendedincaseof futuresurgicalprocedures.
Despiteadvancesindiagnosticsandtreatment,PGisstill asso-ciatedwithhighmorbidityand potentialmortality.Inthiscase, thedelayeddiagnosiscertainlycontributed tothehigh morbid-ity.Thispatientunderwentmanylaparotomiesatyoungage,with largeconsequences:theabdominalmuscleswerelargelyaffected andheruteruswasextirpated.Furthermore,becauseofthelong stayontheICUandsurgicalward,shewasnotabletotakecareof hernewbornandadequatelybond.Luckily,sherecoveredrelatively wellandupontodaynorecurrenceofthediseaseoccurred.
4. Conclusion
Pyodermagangrenosumisarareneutrophilicdermatosisthat can occur after surgery because of the pathergy phenomena. The clinicalsymptoms canmimic a secondary bacterialwound infection,consequently,thediseaseis oftennotrecognizedand mistreated.Timelyrecognitionandadequatetreatmentofthe dis-easeisofutmostimportancetoavoidiatrogenicmorbidity.
DeclarationofCompetingInterest
Noconflictofinterestistodeclare.
Sourcesoffunding
FundingfromtheUniversityofGroningen,theNetherlands,was receivedforpublicationofthisarticle.
Ethicalapproval
Ourlocalinstitutionalboarddecidedthatnoethicalapprovalis necessaryforthiscase-report.
Consent
Writteninformedconsentwasobtainedfromthepatientfor publicationofthiscasereportandaccompanyingimages.
Authorcontribution
CEDandJMHHdraftedthemanuscript.
JFM,MVandBHwereinvolvedintreatmentofthepatientand reviewedthemanuscript.
Allauthorsreadandapprovedthefinalmanuscript.
Registrationofresearchstudies
Nameoftheregistry:Notapplicable.
UniqueidentifyingnumberorregistrationID:NA.
Hyperlinktoyourspecificregistration(mustbepublicly acces-sibleandwillbechecked):NA.
Guarantor
CEvanDonkelaaristheguarantor.
Provenanceandpeerreview
82 C.E.vanDonkelaaretal./InternationalJournalofSurgeryCaseReports69(2020)79–82 References
[1]A.V.Marzano,A.Borghi,D.Wallach,M.Cugno,Acomprehensivereviewof neutrophilicdiseases,Clin.Rev.Allerg.Immunol.54(2018)114–130.
[2]E.Maverakis,C.Ma,K.Shinkai,D.Fiorentino,J.P.Callen,U.Wollina,Diagnostic criteriaofulcerativePyodermaGangrenosumadelphiconsensusof internationalexperts,JAMADermatol.154(2019)461–466.
[3]R.A.Agha,M.R.Borrelli,R.Farwana,K.Koshy,A.Fowler,D.P.Orgill,Forthe SCAREGroup,TheSCARE2018statement:updatingconsensusSurgicalCAse REport(SCARE)guidelines,Int.J.Surg.60(2018)132–136.
[4]E.Ruocco,S.Sangiuliano,A.Gravina,A.Miranda,G.Nicoletti,Pyoderma gangrenosum:anupdatedreview,J.Eur.Acad.Dermatol.Venereol.23(2009) 1008–1017.
[5]D.C.Ehrl,P.I.Heidekrueger,P.N.Broer,Pyodermagangrenosumafterbreast surgery:asystematicreview,J.Plast.Reconstr.Aesthet.Surg.71(2018) 1023–1032.
[6]J.Shen,W.Zhang,X.Jiang,Pyodermagangrenosumaftercesareansection treatedwithskingraft:acasereport,Medicine(Baltimore)98(18)(2019) e1538.
[7]M.Satoh,T.Hiraiwa,T.Yamamoto,Recurrentpyodermagangrenosum developedafteracesareansectionwitha10-yearinterval,Int.J.Dermatol.57 (2018)e92–e93.
[8]U.Steadman,T.Brennan,L.Daman,S.Curry,Pyodermagangrenosum followingcesareandelivery,Obs.Gynecol.91(1998)834–836.
[9]N.Stone,C.Harland,L.Ross,C.Holden,Pyodermagangrenosumcomplicating caesariansection,Clin.Exp.Dermatol.21(1996)468.
[10]F.Banga,N.Schuitemaker,P.Meijer,Pyodermagangrenosumaftercaesarean section:acasereport,Reprod.Health3(2006)3–7.
[11]W.W.Wong,G.R.Machado,M.E.Hill,Pyodermagangrenosum:thegreat pretenderandachallengingdiagnosis,J.Cutan.Med.Surg.15(2015)322–328.
[12]L.J.Borda,L.L.Wong,A.V.Marzano,A.G.Ortega,Extracutaneousinvolvement ofpyodermagangrenosum,Arch.Dermatol.Res.(2019).
[13]M.Fraccalvieri,M.T.Fierro,M.Salomone,P.Fava,E.M.Zingarelli,G.Cavaliere, etal.,Gauze-basednegativepressurewoundtherapy:avalidmethodto managepyodermagangrenosum,Int.WoundJ.11(2014)164–168.
[14]L.Argenta,M.Morykwas,Vacuum-assistedclosure:anewmethodforwound controlandtreatment:clinicalexperience,Ann.Plast.Surg.38(38)(1997) 563.
OpenAccess
ThisarticleispublishedOpenAccessatsciencedirect.com.ItisdistributedundertheIJSCRSupplementaltermsandconditions,which
permitsunrestrictednoncommercialuse,distribution,andreproductioninanymedium,providedtheoriginalauthorsandsourceare credited.