UvA-DARE is a service provided by the library of the University of Amsterdam (https://dare.uva.nl)
Towards strategic sustainability performance evaluation: a study of Portuguese
companies
Dias-Sardinha, I.M.
Publication date
2004
Link to publication
Citation for published version (APA):
Dias-Sardinha, I. M. (2004). Towards strategic sustainability performance evaluation: a study
of Portuguese companies.
General rights
It is not permitted to download or to forward/distribute the text or part of it without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), other than for strictly personal, individual use, unless the work is under an open content license (like Creative Commons).
Disclaimer/Complaints regulations
If you believe that digital publication of certain material infringes any of your rights or (privacy) interests, please let the Library know, stating your reasons. In case of a legitimate complaint, the Library will make the material inaccessible and/or remove it from the website. Please Ask the Library: https://uba.uva.nl/en/contact, or a letter to: Library of the University of Amsterdam, Secretariat, Singel 425, 1012 WP Amsterdam, The Netherlands. You will be contacted as soon as possible.
Fulll List of References
1.. ACBE (Advisory Council on Business and the Environment). 1996.. Environmental Reporting and the Financial Sector: An
ApproachApproach to Good Practice. Department of Environment:
London. .
2.. AccountAbility. 1999. AA 1000 Framework. Standard, Guidelines
andand Professional Qualification (draft). AccountAbility: London.
3.. AMANCO. 2003.
http://www.amanco.com/Holding/USA/amus0019.nsf/pages/des s arrollo.htmm M 5.12.20031
4.. Aragon-Correa JA. 1998. Strategic pro-activity and firm
approachh to the natural environment. Academy of Management
JournalJournal 41 (5): 556-567.
5.. Atkinson G. 2000. Measuring corporate sustainability. Journal of
EnvironmentalEnvironmental Planning and Management 43(2): 235-252.
6.. Azapagic A. 2003. Developing a framework for sustainable developmentt indicators for the mining and minerals industry.
JournalJournal of Cleaner Production (in press).
7.. Azar C, Holmberg J, Lindgreen K. 1996. Socio-ecological indicatorss for sustainability. Ecological Economics 18:89-112. 8.. Azzone G, Manzini R, Noci G, Welford R, Young CW. 1996.
Definingg environmental performance indicators: an integrated framework.. Business Strategy and the Environment 5(2): 69-80. 9.. Azzone G, Manzini R. 1994. Measuring strategic environmental
performance.. Business Strategy and the Environment 3(1): 1-14. 10.. Bakker FGA de. 2001. Product-oriented Environmental
Management.Management. Twente University Press: the Netherlands.
11.. Baptista I, Vasconcelos L, Santos E, Tente H, Simoes S, Caser U. 2002.. Reflexoes sobre os Desafios de Desenvolvimentos
SustentavelSustentavel para a Sonae. WteamUp: Lisboa.
12.. Bartolomeo M. 1995. Environmental Performance Indicators in
13.. Bendell J, Young M. 2003. World review. A synopsis of the key strategicc developments in corporate responsibility around the globee over the last quarter. The Journal of Corporate Citizenship
SummerSummer 10:7-19.
14.. Bennett M, Hughes A, James R 1999a. Evaluating the whole-life environmentall performance of products: a comparison of eco-points,, eco-compass and eco-costing approaches. In
SustainableSustainable Measures: Evaluation and Reporting of
EnvironmentalEnvironmental and Social Performance. Bennett M, James R
Klinkerss L (eds.). Greenleaf: Sheffield; 283-311.
15.. Bennett M, James R Klinkers L. 1999b. Sustainable Measures:
EvaluationEvaluation and Reporting of Environmental and Social
Performance.Performance. Bennett M, James R Klinkers L (eds.). Greenleaf:
Sheffield. .
16.. Bennett M, James R 1999c. Key themes in environmental, social andd sustainability performance evaluation and reporting. In
SustainableSustainable Measures: Evaluation and Reporting of
EnvironmentalEnvironmental and Social Performance. Bennett M, James R
Klinkerss L (eds.). Greenleaf: Sheffield; 29-74.
17.. Bennett M, James R 1999d. ISO 14031 and the future of
environmentall performance evaluation. In Sustainable Measures:
EvaluationEvaluation and Reporting of Environmental and Social
Performance.Performance. Bennett M, James R Klinkers L (eds.). Greenleaf:
Sheffield;; 76-97.
18.. Berkel R van. 2000. Sustainable development and cleaner productionn in minerals and energy production. In Sixth
InternationalInternational Symposium on Environmental Issues and Waste ManagementManagement in Energy and Mineral Production, Alberta, Canada,
300 May - 2 June. Curtin University of Technology: Perth, Australia;; 1-17.
19.. Bieker T, Gminder C-U. 2001. Towards a sustainability balanced scorecard.. Paper presented at Oikos PhD summer academy 20011 Environmental Management & Policy and Related Aspects
ofof Sustainability.
20.. Bieker T, Waxenberger B. 2002. Sustainability balanced
scorecardd and business ethics. Paper presented at the Greening
21.. Bieker T. 2002. Managing corporate sustain ability with the balancedd scorecard: developing a balanced scorecard for integrityy management. Paper presented at Oikos PhD summer academyy 2002 Sustainability, Corporations and Institutional
Arrangements. Arrangements.
22.. BMU (Bundesumweltministerium; German Federal Ministry of thee Environment) and UBA (Umweltbundesamt; German Federal
Environmentt Agency). 1997. Guide to Corporate Environmental
Indicators.Indicators. German Federal Ministry of Environment and German
Federall Environment Agency: Bonn, Berlin.
23.. Brink van den WMT. 2002. Guide Screening and Rating
Sustainability.Sustainability. Ministry of VROM (ed.). Rosemarie Richards: the
Netherlands. .
24.. British Standard EN 129753
25.. BSI (British Standards Institute), AccountAbility, Forum for the Future.. 2000. The SIGMA project. Sustainability in Practice. http://www.bsi.orQ.uk/siama// [03-08-2000].
26.. Buitenkamp M, Spapens. 1999. Eco-space Audit: An Input
AnalysisAnalysis for Products. Friends of the Earth Netherlands: the
Netherlands. .
27.. Burns S. 1999. The natural step: a compass for environmental managementt systems. Corporate Environmental Strategy 6(3): 3-15. .
28.. BUWAL (Bundesamt fur Umwelt, Wald and Landschaft)/ OFEFP (Officee Federal de ('Environment, des Forets et du Paysage). 1991.. Bilan Ecologique des Materiaux demballage. Etat en 1990. Cahierr de ^environment 132. OFEFP: Bern.
29.. Callens I, Tyteca D (draft). 1995. Towards indicators of sustainablee development for firms: concepts and definitions.
UniversiteUniversite Catholique et de Gestion. Belgium
30.. Callens I, Wolters L. 1998. Factors of unsustainability: identification,, links and hierarchy. Business Strategy and the
EnvironmentEnvironment 7: 32-42.
31.. CEFIC (The European Chemical Industry Council). 1998. http://www.cefic.be e
32.. CEPAA/ SAI (Center for Economics Priorities Accreditation Agencyy / Social Accountability International). 2000. SA 8000
(Social(Social Accountability 8000) http://www.cepaa.ora/sa8000.htm.
33.. Cerin R Dobers R 2001. What does the performance of the DJSGII tell us?. Eco-Management and Auditing 8: 123-133. 34.. Characklis GW, Richards DJ. 1999. The evolution of industrial
environmentall performance metrics: trends and challenges.
CorporateCorporate Environmental Strategy 6(3): 387-398.
35.. CICA (Canadian Institute of Chartered Accountants). 1994.
ReportingReporting on Environmental Performance. Toronto, Ontario.
36.. Cramer J. 2002. From financial to sustainable profit. Corporate
SocialSocial Responsibility and Environmental Management 9: 99-106.
37.. Dias-Sardinha I, Reijnders L, Antunes R 2001. Environmental andd triple bottom-line performance evaluation in Portuguese organizations.. In proceedings of the 7th European Roundtable
onon Cleaner Production. Lund: Sweden.
38.. Dias-Sardinha I, Reijnders L, Antunes R 2002. From
environmentall performance evaluation to eco-efficiency and sustainabilityy balanced scorecards: a study of companies operatingg in Portugal. Environmental Quality Management Winter. 511 -64.
39.. Dias-Sardinha I, Reijnders L, Antunes R 2004. Developing a sustainabilityy balanced scorecard for the environmental services off three business units of large Portuguese companies.
CorporateCorporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management
(submitted). .
40.. Dias-Sardinha I, Reijnders L. 2001. Environmental performance evaluationn and sustainability performance evaluation of
companies:: an evolutionary framework. Eco-Management and
AuditingAuditing 8(2): 71-79.
41.. Dias-Sardinha I, Reijnders L. 2004. Evaluating environmental and sociall performance of large Portuguese companies: a balanced scorecardd approach. Business Strategy and the Environment (in press). .
42.. Dias-Sardinha I. 2000. Choosing the environmental performance evaluationn framework based on the environmental conceptual objectivess of the organisation. Research Workshop on Corporate
EnvironmentalEnvironmental Management. ERP Environment. University of
Manchester:: UK.
43.. Ditz D, Ranganathan J. 1997. Measuring Up: Toward a Common
FrameworkFramework for Tracking Corporate Environmental Performance.
WRII (World Resources Institute): Washington, DC. http://www.igc.org/wrii [11-05-2000].
44.. DJSGI (Dow Jones Sustainability Group Index). 1999. SAM (Sustainablee Asset Management): Switzerland.
http://indexes.dowiones.com.. [12-11-1999].
45.. Dobers P, Strannegard L, Wolff R. 2001. Knowledge interests in corporatee environmental management. Business Strategy and
thethe Environment 10: 335-343.
46.. Eagan R Joeres E. 1997. Development of a facility-based environmentall performance indicators related to sustainable development.. Journal Cleaner Production 5(4): 269-278. 47.. Eccles RG. 1991. The performance measurement manifesto.
HarvardHarvard Business Review January/February: 131 -137.
48.. EEA (European Environment Agency). 2001. Late Lessons from
EarlyEarly Warnings: the Precautionary Principle 1896-2000.
Environmentall Issues report . EEA: Copenhagen. 49.. EEEI (European Eco-Efficiency Initiative). 2000. European
PartnersPartners for the Environment. Final report for Phase 1. WBCSD.
http://www.epe.be/eeei/EEEIPhase1.html.. [28-07-2000]. 50.. EMAS (Eco Management and Audit Scheme). 1993. EC n
1836/93. .
51.. Epstein MJ, Wisner R 2001. Using a balanced scorecard to implementt sustainability. Environmental Quality Management 11(2):: 1-10.
52.. Figge F, Hahn T, Schaltegger S, Wagner M. 2002. The sustainabilityy balanced scorecard: linking sustainability managementt to business strategy. Business Strategy and the
EnvironmentEnvironment 11: 269-284.
53.. Fiksel J, McDaniel J, Mendenhall C. 1999. Measuring progress towardss sustainability principles, process and best practices. In
GreeningGreening of Industry Conference - best practice proceedings.
Battellee Memorial Institute: USA.
54.. Freeman RE. 1984. Srategic Management: A Stakeholder
Approach.Approach. Pitamn: Boston, MA.
55.. GEMI (Global Environmental Management Initiative). 1992.
EnvironmentalEnvironmental Self Assessment Program. GEMI: Washington,
56.. Gerde VW, Logsdon JM. 2001. Measuring environmental performance:: use of the toxics release inventory (TRI) and other U.S.. environmental databases. Business Strategy and the
EnvironmentEnvironment 10(5): 269-285.
57.. Ghobadian A, Viney H, Liu J, James R 1998. Extending linear approachess to mapping corporate environmental behaviour.
BusinessBusiness Strategy and the Environment 7: 13-23.
58.. Gminder C-U, BiekerT. 2002. Managing corporate social responsibilityy by using the "sustainability balanced scorecard". Paperr presented at the Greening of Industry Network Conference 2002,, Göteborg, Sweden.
59.. Grafe-Buckens A, Hinton A-F. 1998. Engaging the stakeholders: corporatee views and current trends. Business Strategy and the
Environment.Environment. 7: 124-133.
60.. Greenberg R., UngerC. 1992. Improving the environmental process.. Total Quality Environmental Management. Spring 1992: 269-276. .
61.. GRI (Global Reporting Initiative). 2000. Sustainability Reporting
GuidelinesGuidelines (draft). GRI: USA. http://globalreporting.org/
[10-08-2000]. .
62.. GRI (Global Reporting Initiative). 2002. Sustainability Reporting
Guidelines.Guidelines. GRI: the Netherlands.
63.. Hall S, Roome N. 1995. Strategic choices and sustainable strategies.. In The Greening of Industry Resource Guide and
Bibliography,Bibliography, Groenewegen R Fischer K, Jenkins E, Schot J.
(eds.).. Island Press: Washington, DC: 10-36.
64.. Haq G, Bailey R Chadwick M, Forrester J, Kuylenstierna J, Leach G,, Villagrasa D, Fergusson M, Skinner I, Oberthur S. 2001. Determiningg the costs to industry of environmental regulation.
EuropeanEuropean Environment 11: 125-139.
65.. Hass J. 1996. Environmental (green) management typologies: ann evaluation, operationalization and empirical development.
BusinessBusiness Strategy and the Environment 5(2): 59-68.
66.. Heijungs R, Guinee J, Huppes G, Lankreijer RM, Udo de Haes HA,, Wegener Sleeswijk A, Ansems AMM, Eggels PG, van Duin R,, de Goede HR 1992. Environmental Life Cycle Assessment of Products.. Guide and Backgrounds. CML, Leiden University, Leiden. .
67.. Hemel C van. 1998. Eco-design Empirically Explored. Design for
EnvironmentEnvironment in Dutch Small and Medium Enterprises. Delft
Universityy of Technology. Boekland MilieuBoek: Amsterdam. 68.. Henriques I, Sadorsky R 1999. The relationship between
environmentall commitment and managerial perceptions of stakeholderr importance. Academy of Management Journal 42(1): 87-99. .
69.. Hockerts K, O'Rourke A. 2002. The balanced scorecard a tool to managee social sustainability. Paper presented at the Greening of
IndustryIndustry Network Conference 2002, Göteborg, Sweden.
70.. Hunt C, Auster E. 1990. Pro-active environmental management: avoidingg the toxic trap. Sloan Management Review Winter: 7-18. 71.. Hussey M, Kirsop P, Meissen R. 2001. Global Reporting Initiative: ann evaluation of sustainable development metrics for industry.
EnvironmentalEnvironmental Quality Management 1-19.
72.. ICCR. 1997. Principles for global corporate responsibility: benchmarkss for measuring business performance.
73.. ICI. 1997. Environmental Burden: The ICI Approach. ICI: London. 74.. INSEAD. 2003. Balanced Scorecard and Sustainability
ConferenceConference Proceedings, Thursday 20th November 2003. France. 75.. IPPC. 2001. Directive on Integrated Pollution Prevention and
Control,Control, 96/61 /EC.
76.. IRRC (Investor Responsibility Research Centre). 1996.
EnvironmentalEnvironmental Reporting and Third Party Statements. IRRC/
GEMI:: Washington, DC http://www.irrc.ora/Drofile/index.html 77.. ISO (International Organization for Standardization). 1999. ISO
14031:14031: Environmental Management - Environmental PerformancePerformance Evaluation Guidelines. ISO: Geneva.
78.. ISO (International Organization for Standardization). 1999.
ISO/TRISO/TR 14032: Environmental Management Examples of EnvironmentalEnvironmental Performance Evaluation. ISO: Geneva.
79.. James P, Bennett M. 1995. Environment-related performance measurementt in business. UNEP Industry and Environment 18(2-3):: 40-44.
80.. James R 1994. Business environmental performance
measurement.. Business Strategy and the Environment 3(2): 59-66. .
81.. Johnson DS. 1998. Identification and selection of environmental performancee indicators: application of the balanced scorecard approach.. Corporate Environmental Strategy 5(4): 34-41.
82.. Johnson R, Soenen L. 2003. Indicators of successful companies 83.. Johnston A, Smith A. 2001. The characteristics and features of
corporatee environmental performance indicators - a case study off the water industry of England and Wales. Eco-Management
andand Auditing 8(1): 1-11.
84.. Jung E, Kim J, Rhee S. 2001. The measurement of corporate environmentall performance and its application to the analysis of efficiencyy in oil industry. Journal of Cleaner Production 9(6): 551-563. .
85.. Kaplan R, Norton D. 1992a. The balanced scorecard: measures thatt drive performance. Harvard Business Review
January/February:: 71-79.
86.. Kaplan R, Norton D. 1992b. Putting the balanced scorecard to work.. Harvard Business Review September/October: 134-142. 87.. Kaplan R, Norton D. 1996. The Balanced Scorecard: Translating
StrategyStrategy Into Action. Harvard Business School Press: Boston.
88.. Kaplan RS. 2003. Using the balanced scorecard to link
environmentall performance to strategic objectives. In INSEAD.
BalancedBalanced Scorecard and Sustainability Conference Proceedings,
Thursdayy 20th November 2003. France.
89.. Karl-Henrik R. 2000. Tools and concepts for sustainable development:: how do they relate to a general framework for sustainablee development and to each other. Journal Cleaner
ProductionProduction 8(3): 243-254.
90.. Kolk A, Mauser A. 2002. The evolution of environmental management:: from stage models to performance evaluation.
BusinessBusiness Strategy and the Environment 11:14-31.
91.. Kolk A. 2000. The Economics of Environmental Management. Universityy of Amsterdam, Faculty of Economics (WIMM): the Netherlands. .
92.. KPMG. 1999. KPMG International Survey of Environmental
ReportingReporting 1999. University of Amsterdam, Faculty of
Economicss (WIMM) in collaboration with KPMG International Environmentt Network.
93.. KPMG. 2000. Beyond the Numbers: How Leading Organisations
areare Linking Values with Value to Gain Competitive Advantage.
KPMG. .
94.. Lehni M. 1999. Eco-efficiency Indicators: A Tool for Better
Decision-MakingDecision-Making Executive Brief. World Business Council for
Sustainablee Development (WBCSD): Geneva. http://www.wbcsd.ch.. [15.06.2000].
95.. Madsen H, Ulhoi JR 2001. Integrating environmental and stakeholderr management. Business Strategy and Environment. 10(2):: 77-88.
96.. Marrewijk M van, Werre M. 2002. Multiple levels of corporate sustainability.. Meeting of the European Corporate Sustainability
FrameworkFramework September 2002, Rotterdam.
97.. Marrewijk M van, Werre M. 2003. Multiple levels of corporate sustainability.. Journal of Business Ethics 44:107-119.
98.. Marsanich A. 1997. Environmental indicators in EMAS
environmentalenvironmental statements. FEEM Institute: Milan.
99.. Mauser A. 2001. The Greening of Business Environmental
ManagementManagement and Performance Evaluation: An Empirical Study inin the Dutch Dairy Industry. Eburon Publishers: Delft.
100.. MEPI (Measuring Environmental Performance of Industry). http://www.sussex.ac.uk/sDru/environment/research/indicator/. . htt [12-10-1999].
101.. Neely A. 1999. Measuring Business Performance. Economist Books:: London.
102.. NRTEE (Canadian National Round Table on the Environment andd the Economy). 1998. Measuring Eco-efficiency in Business http://www.nrtee-trnee.ca a
103.. OECD. 1994. Environmental Indicators: OECD Core Set. Paris. 104.. Olsthoorn X, Tyteca D, Wehrmeyer W, Wagner M. 2001.
Environmentall indicators for business: a review of the literature andd standardisation methods. Journal of Cleaner Production 9(5):: 453-463.
105.. OSHA (Occupational Safety & Health Administration). 2002. Safetyy & Health Program standards.
http://www.osha.gov/SLTC/safetyhealth h
106.. Pearce D. 1997. Essays in Environmental and Ecological
Economics.Economics. Edward Elgar. Cheltenham.
107.. Piet J. 1994. Milieuprestatie-indicatoren (translation)
Environmentall performance indicators. Holland Management
Review,Review, Deloitte & Touche Tohamatsu International (eds.): 41.
108.. Prakash A. 2001. Why do firms adopt "beyond-compliance" environmentall policies? Business Strategy and the Environment 10:286-299. .
109.. Reijnders L. 1998. The factor X debate: setting targets for eco-efficiency.efficiency. Journal of Industrial Ecology 2(1): 13-22. 110.. Reijnders L. 2000. A normative strategy for sustainable
resourcee choice and recycling. Resources, Conservation and
RecyclingRecycling 28: 121-133.
111.. Reinhardt F. 2000. Down to Earth: Applying Business Principles
toto Environmental Management. Harvard Business School
Press:: Boston.
112.112. Rivera-Camino J. 2001. What motivates European firms to adoptt environmental management systems? Eco-Management
andand Auditing 8(3): 134-143.
113.. Robert K-H, Schmidt-Bleek B, Aloisi de Larderel J, Basile G, Jansenn J, Kuehr R, Price Thomas R Suzuki M, Hawken R Wackernagell M. 2002. Strategic sustainable development -selection,, design and synergies of applied tools. Journal of
CleanerCleaner Production 10(3): 197-214.
114.. Roome N. 1992. Developing environmental management strategies.. Business Strategy and Environment 1:11 -24. 115.. Roome N. 2001. Conceptualising and studying the contribution
off networks in environmental management and sustainable development.. Business Strategy and the Environment 10: 69-76. .
116.. Roy M-J, Boiral O, Lagacé D. 2001. Environmental commitment andd manufacturing excellence: a comparative study within Canadiann industry. Business Strategy and the Environment 10: 257-268. .
117.. SEIA (Sociedade de Engenharia e Inovacao Ambiental). 2000.
PrevengaoPrevengao e Controlo Integrados da Poluigao. Implicagóes da AplicagaoAplicagao da Directiva 96I61/CE (translation) Impact of the DirectiveDirective on Integrated Pollution Prevention and Control, 96/61JEC.96/61JEC. Direcgao-Geral da Industrial Portugal.
118.. Shrivastava R Hart S. 1995. Creating sustainable corporations.
BusinessBusiness Strategy and Environment 4(3): 154-165.
119.. Shrivastava R 1995. Environmental technologies and
competitivee advantage. Strategic Management Journal 16:183-200. .
120.. Siri Group (Sustainable Investment Research International Group).. 2001. www.siriaroup.org.
121.. Skillius A, Wennberg U. 1998. Continuity, Credibility and
Comparability:Comparability: Key Challenges for Corporate Environmental PerformancePerformance Measurement and Communication. IIIEE: Lund,
Sweden. .
http://www.lu.se/IIIEE/research/managemetn/asa_ccc_reDort.ht t mii [21.7.2000].
122.. Smeets E, Weterings R. 1999. Environmental Indicators:
TypologyTypology and Overview. EEA (European Environment Agency).
Technicall report n 25. EEA: Denmark.
123.. Sonae SGPS. 2002. Relatorio Ambiental. Sonae SGPS 2002. http://www.sonae.pt/files/ambiente/relatorios/RelatorioAmbient t al2002.pdff M 5.12.20031
124.. Spangenberg J, Bonniot 0.1998. Sustainability Indicators A
CompassCompass on the Road Towards Sustainability. Wuppertal
Institute. .
125.. Stanners D, Bourdeau R 1995. Europe's Environment The Dobriss Assessment. European Environment Agency (EEA): Copenhagen. .
126.. Starik M, Rands GR 1995. Weaving an integrated web: : multilevell and multisystem perspectives of ecologically sustainablee organisations. Academy of Management Review 20:: 908-935.
127.. Thoresen J. 1999. Environmental performance evaluation a tooll for industrial improvement. Journal of Cleaner Production 7:: 365-370.
128.. Tyteca D, Carlens J, Berkhout F, Hertin J, Wehrmeyer W, Wagnerr M. 2002. Corporate environmental performance evaluationn evidence from the MEPI project. Business Strategy
129.. UNCTAD. 1993. Environmental Management in Transnational
Corporations:Corporations: Research on the Benchmark Corporate EnvironmentalEnvironmental Survey. United Nations: New York.
130.. UNEP (United Nations Environment Programme). 1994.
CorporateCorporate Environmental Reporting. Technical report, 24.
UNEP:: Paris.
131.. UNU (United Nations University). 2000. Zero Emissions in
Practice,Practice, http://www.unu.edu/zef
132.. Upham R 2000. An assessment of the natural step theory of sustainability.. Journal of Cleaner Production 8: 445-454. 133.. Veleva V, Ellenbecker M. 2001. Indicators of sustainable
production:: framework and methodology. Journal of Cleaner
ProductionProduction 9: 519-549.
134.. Veleva V, Hart M, Crumbley C. 2001. Indicators of sustainable production.. Journal of Cleaner Production 9: 447-452.
135.. Verfaillie H, Bidwell R. 2000. Measuring Eco-efficiency: A Guide
toto Reporting Company Performance (1-38). WBCSD: Geneva.
http://www.wbcsd.ch.. [28-09-2000].
136.. Von Weizsacker U, Lovins A, Lovins L. 1997. Factor Four:
DoublingDoubling Wealth, Halving Resource Use. Eartscan: London
137.. Wackernagel M, Rees W. 1996. Our Ecological Footprint.
ReducingReducing Human Impact on the Earth. New Society Publishers.
Gabriolaa Island. BC.
138.. WBCSD (World Business Council for Sustainable
Development).. 1998. How Companies Measure and Report theirr Eco-efficiency. WBCSD: Geneva
139.. WCED (World Commission on Environment and Development). 1987.. Our Common Future. The Brundtland Report. Oxford Universityy Press: UK.
140.. Weaver R Schmidt-Bleek F. 1999. Factor 10: Manifesto fora
SustainableSustainable Planet. Greenleaf: Sheffield, UK.
141.. WehrmeyerW. 1995. Measuring Environmental Business
Performance:Performance: A Comprehensive Guide. Business and the
Environmentt Practitioner Series. Ruth Hillary (eds.). Stanley Thornes:: UK.
142.. Weiss A. 2000. Preparing for Human and Labour Rights
Reporting:Reporting: Suggested Benchmarks for Multinational Corporations.Corporations. Price Waterhouse Coopers.
http://globalreDortinQ.org// [11 -07-2000].
143.. Wells R, Hochman M, Hochman S, O'Conell R 1992. Measuring environmentall success. Total Quality Environmental
ManagementManagement 1 (4): 315-337.
144.. Weterings R, Opschoor H. 1992. The Eco-Capacity as a
ChallengeChallenge to Technology Development. Advisory Council on
Naturee and Environment. Rijswijk: the Netherlands. 145.. Young CW, Rikhardsson M. Environmental performance
indicatorss for business. Eco-Management and Auditing 3(3)) :113-125.
146.. Young CW, Welford R. 1999. An environmental performance measurementt framework for business. In Sustainable
Measures:Measures: Evaluation and Reporting of Environmental and SocialSocial Performance. Bennett M, James R Klinkers L (eds.).
Greenleaf:: Sheffield, UK; 98-116.
147.. Zingales F, Hockerts K. 2003. Balanced Scorecard and
Sustainability:Sustainability: Examples from Literature and Practice. INSEAD/
CMERR working paper. INSEAD: Fontainebleau.
148.. Zingales F, O'Rourke A, Hockerts K. 2002. Balanced Scorecard
andand Sustainability State of the Art Review. INSEAD/ CMER
