• No results found

42 Sixth, this paper suggests that the DAF can potentially increase alliance performance by decreasing monitoring costs and optimizing the benefits associated with a larger number of board members involved in alliance monitoring. Future research can study the relationship between DAF and monitoring costs in more detail, making it possible to generalize this conclusion more firmly. This potential research would complement the study carried out in this thesis and contribute significantly to the alliance literature.

Finally, despite the article’s potential contributions to the relationship between alliance function and alliance performance, this paper represents only a first step towards a deeper understanding of alliance capability development by means of a dedicated alliance function.

Future research can undertake further investigation into the role of the dedicated alliance function in the creation of alliance capability, by further examining other important factors in this process (Liu and Ravichandran, 2011; Russo and Vurro, 2019). More specifically, future research can complement the researched field of this study by exploring to what extent the experience accumulated through the DAF has an effect in the early steps of an alliance (such as the due diligence process, partner selection, and the construction of shared common goals), therefore making a comprehensive contribution to the alliance literature (Findikoglu et al.

2019).

43 companies can maximize their opportunities for success is through the establishment of a dedicated alliance function (Kale and Singh, 2007; Dyer et al., 2001). Companies with this function are able to centralize alliance management aspects in order to facilitate the exchange of knowledge and to assimilate the crucial notions for successfully managing an alliance (e.g., Findikoglu et al., 2019). To investigate whether this translates into a positive effect on alliance performance, this thesis posed the following research question: “Does the dedicated alliance function have a positive impact on the governance of the alliance, which, in turn, results in higher alliance performance?”. Using a 2014 dataset, created by researchers from a Dutch business school (Reuer et al., 2014), this thesis found that the dedicated alliance function has a positive impact on alliance performance and that this positive relationship can potentially be explained through the influence the DAF has on alliance governance.

In the alliance literature, it has been repeatedly demonstrated that alliance governance represents a critical factor determining the success of alliances, given its relevance for sustained inter-firm collaboration (Castro et al., 2016; Hoetker et al., 2009; Niesten et al., 2015).

Therefore, this thesis, in order to answer to the research question, used ‘board size’ and

‘contract completeness’ as representatives of alliance governance and as mediators of the impact of the DAF on alliance performance. However, contrary to other authors' claims (e.g., Parkhe, 1993; Mayer and Argyres, 2004), the results of this thesis showed that only one of these two elements has an impact on alliance performance, ‘board size’. Surprisingly, it emerged that ‘contract completeness’ does not have any significant influence on alliance performance and that, therefore, the impact of the DAF on the success of alliances cannot be explained by this factor. Practically, this means that companies that aim to maximize their chances of successful alliances could benefit by having more efficient and leaner boards of directors, capable of managing the partnership effectively, rather than having more complete contracts that impose strict guidelines and rules of conduct to inhibit opportunism and

44 contractual hazards. This finding led us to further study the relationship between DAF and board size. This relationship has been found to be significant, confirming that the DAF has an impact on board composition. However, it was found that the dedicated alliance function, instead of reducing the number of board members involved in monitoring activities, would increase the board size. This suggests that the DAF could potentially increase alliance performance by decreasing alliance monitoring costs, thereby increasing board efficiency and, consequently, the net benefits resulting from a higher board monitoring level. Board members would thus become less expensive, as by establishing a DAF, an organization would be able to pay the same monitoring cost for a larger board as a company with fewer board members and without a dedicated alliance function. Therefore, a company would have a greater advantage if it increased the size of its board of directors in order to have better monitoring and take full advantage of the benefits created by a DAF.

This finding extends the literature on JVs, making several relevant contributions. The main theoretical contributions of the paper lie in the concept of alliance performance and are as follows. First, this paper found that alliance performance can be optimised through the establishment of a dedicated function. By finding this, this thesis opens the black box between the dedicated alliance function and the performance of the joint venture, finally providing clarification on the potential effect of this function on alliance management. Second, this study found that alliance performance is significantly influenced by board composition. Therefore, companies aiming at fostering alliance success through the establishment of a dedicated alliance function should take this governance mechanism extensively into account in the process of managing joint ventures.

In summary, these results recommend a course of action to address the low alliance success rate observed in recent years, identifying the establishment of a dedicated alliance function as the means to a successful alliance.

45 References

Albers, S. (2010). Configurations of alliance governance systems. Schmalenbach Business Review, 62, 204-233, https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03396805.

Alliance Analyst. (1996). Managing alliances: skills for the modem era. March

Anand, B., & Khanna, T. (2000). Do firms learn to create value? The case of alliances. Strategic Management Journal, 21(3), 295-316.

Ariño A., Reuer J. (2004). Alliance Contractual Design. Anselmo Rubiralta Center for Globalization and Strategy. Working Pape

Bamford, J., & Ernst, D. (2002). Measuring alliance performance. McKinsey & Company.

Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173-1182.

Barney, J. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1), 99-120. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920639101700108

Baysinger, B., & Hoskisson, R. E. (1990). The composition of boards of directors and strategic control: Effects on corporate strategy. Academy of Management Review, 15(1), 72-87

Becker, L. A. (2000). Effect size (ES). University of Colorado, Colorado Springs.

Bleeke, J., Ernst, D., & Ernst, E. (1993). Collaborating to compete: Using strategic alliances and acquisitions in the global marketplace (1st ed.). Wiley. ISBN:0471580090

Boone, A.L., Field, L.C., Karpoff, J.M. & Raheja, C.G. (2007). The determinants of corporate board size and composition: An empirical analysis. Journal of Financial Economics, 85(1), 66-101.

Breusch, T. S., & Pagan, A. R. (1979). A simple test for heteroscedasticity and random coefficient variation. Econometrica: Journal of the econometric society, 1287-1294.

Cao, Z., Lumineau, F. (2015). Revisiting the interplay between contractual and relational governance: A qualitative and meta-analytic investigation. Journal of Operations Management, 33, 15-42.

Caloghirou, Y., Ioannides, S., & Vonortas, N. S. (2003). Research Joint Ventures. Journal of Economic Surveys, 17(4), 541-564. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-6419.00204

Casciaro, T. (2003), Determinants of governance structure in alliances: the role of strategic, task and partner uncertainties, Industrial and Corporate Change, 12(6), 1223-1251.

https://doi.org/10.1093/icc/12.6.1223

Castro, I., Galan, J., Casanueva, C. (2016). Management of alliance portfolios and the role of the board of directors. Journal of Business Economics and Management, 2(1), 215-233.

46 Cheng, S., Evans, J.H., Nagarajan, N. J. (2008) Board size and firm performance: the moderating effects of the market for corporate control. Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting 31, 121–145 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11156-007-0074-3

Contractor, F. J., & Lorange, P. (2002), Cooperative strategies and alliances(1st ed.). Emerald Publishing Limited. ISBN-10:978-0080441399

Contractor, F. J., & Wonchan, R. (2000), Negotiating alliance contracts: Strategy and behavioural effects of alternative compensation arrangements, International Business Review, 9(3), 271-299.

Conner KR, Prahalad CK. 1996. A resource-based theory of the firm: knowledge versus opportunism. Organization Science 7(5), 477-501

Child, J., Faulkner, D., & Tallman, S. B. (2005), Cooperative strategy: Managing alliances, networks, and Joint Ventures(2nd ed.). Oxford University Press. ISBN:978-0191514777 Crocker, K. J., & Reynolds, K. J. (1993). The efficiency of incomplete contracts: An empirical analysis of air force engine procurement. Rand Journal of Economics, 24(1), 126-146.

Das, T. K., & Teng, B. (2000). Instabilities of strategic alliances: An internal tension perspective. Organizational Science, 11(1), 77-101 https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.11.1.77.12570 Doz, Y. L. & Hamel, G. (1998), Alliance advantage: The art of creating value through partnering(1st ed.). Harvard Business School Press. ISBN:978-0875846163

Draulans, J., Deman, A. P., & Volberda, H. W. (2003) Building alliance capability:

Management techniques for superior alliance performance. Long Range Planning, 36(1), 151–

166.

Dyer, J. H., & Singh, H. (1998). The relational view: Cooperative strategy and sources of interorganizational competitive advantage. Academy of Management Review, 23(4), 660-679.

Dyer, J. H., Kale, P., & Singh, H. (2002). Alliance capability, stock market response, and long-term alliance success: The role of alliance function. Strategic Management Journal, 23(8), 747–767. https://www.jstor.org/stable/3094291

Dyer, J. H., Kale, P., & Singh, H. (2001). How to make strategic alliances work. MIT Sloan Management Review, 37-43.

Dussauge, P., & Garrette, B. (1999). Cooperative strategy: Competing successfully through strategic alliances(1st ed.). Wiley. ISBN:978-0471974925

Eisenhardt K, Martin J. 2000. Dynamic capabilities: what are they? Strategic Management Journal, Special Issue, 21(10-11), 1105-1121

Elfenbein D.W., Lerner J. (2003). Ownership and control lights in internet portal alliances, 1995-1999. RAND Journal of Economics, 34(2), 356-369.

Fama, E.F., & Jensen, M.C. (1983). Separation of ownership and control. The Journal of Law and Economics, 26(2), 301-325.

Fama, E.F. (1980). Agency problems and the theory of the firm. Journal of Political Economy, 88(2), 288-307.

47 Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Buchner, A., & Lang, A. G. (2009). Statistical power analyses using G*

Power 3.1: Tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behavior Research Methods, 41(4), 1149-1160

Findikoglu, M., & Lavie Dovev (2019). The contingent value of the dedicated alliance function. Strategic Organization, 17(2), 177-209. https://doi.org/10.1177/1476127018817191 Forrest, J. (1989). Management of technology innovation; Strategic alliances in the ‘new’

biotechnology industry. (Doctoral Thesis, Cardiff Business School).

Geringer, J. M., & Hebert, L. (1989). Control and performance of international joint ventures.

Journal of International Business Studies 20(2), 235 – 254.

Gibbson, R. (1992). Game theory for applied economists. Princeton University Press:

Princeton.

Guest, P. M. (2009). The impact of board size on firm performance: evidence from the UK.

The European Journal of Finance. 385-404. https://doi.org/10.1080/13518470802466121 Gulati, R. (1995). Does familiarity breed trust? The implications of repeated ties for contractual choice in alliances. Academy of Management Journal 38(1), 85–112. https://doi.org/256729 Gulati, R., Nohria, N., & Zaheer, A. (2000). Strategic networks. Strategic Management Journal, 21(3), 203-215. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(200003)21:3<203::AID-SMJ102>3.0.CO;2-K

Gulati R and Nickerson J (2008) Interorganizational trust, governance choice, and exchange performance. Organization Science 19, 688–708.

Harman, H. H. (1976). Modern factor analysis. University of Chicago press.

Hayes, A. F., (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis.: A regression-based approach (1st ed). The Guilford Press.

Heimeriks, K. H., Bingham, C. B., & Laamanen, T. (2015). Unveiling the temporally contingent role of codification in alliance success. Strategic Management Journal, 36(3), 462–

473. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2224

Heimeriks, K. H., and Duysters, G. (2007) Alliance capability as a mediator between experience and alliance performance: An empirical investigation into the alliance capability development process. Journal of Management Studies, 44(1), 25–49.

https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2006.00639.x

Heimeriks, K. H., Duysters, G. M., & Vanhaverbeke, W. P. M. (2007). Learning mechanisms and differential performance in alliance portfolios. Strategic Organization, 5(4), 373–408.

https://doi.org/10.1177/1476127007083347

Hennart, J. F. (2006), Alliance research: Less is more. Journal of Management Studies 43(1), 1621-1628. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2006.00654.x

Hermalin, B. E. & Weisbach, M. S. (2003). Boards of directors as an endogenously determined institution: A survey of the economic evidence. Economic Policy Review 9, 7-26.

48 Hoang, H., Rothaermel, F., T. (2005). The effect of general and partner-specific alliance experience on joint R&D project performance. Academy of Management Journal, 48(2), 332–

345.

Hoetker, G. & Mellewigt, T. (2009). Choice and performance of governance mechanisms:

Matching alliance governance to asset type. Strategic Management Journal, 30(10), 1025-1044. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.775

Hoffmann, W. H. (2005). How to manage a portfolio of alliances. Long Range Planning, 38(1), 121-143.

https://doi:10.1016/j.lrp.2005.03.001

Jensen, M. C. (1993). The modern industrial revolution, exit, and the failure of internal control systems. Journal of Finance, 48(3), 831-880.

Joskow, P. L. (1987). Contract duration and relationship-specific imvestments: Empricial evidence from coal markets. American Economic Review, (77), 168-185.

Judge, W. Q., & Talaulicar, T. (2017). Board involvement in the strategic decision-making process: A comprehensive review. Annals of Corporate Governance, 2(2). 51-169.

Kale, P., & Singh, H. (2007) Building firm capabilities through learning. The role of the alliance learning process in alliance capability and firm-level alliance success. Strategic Management Journal, 28(10), 981-1000. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.616

Kale, P., & Singh, H. (2009) Managing strategic alliances: What do we know now and where do we go from here? Academy of Management Perspective, 23.

https://doi.org/10.5465/amp.2009.43479263

Keating, C., Shadwick, W., F. (2002). A universal performance measure. The Finance Development Centre. 1-42.

Kim, J., & Wu, A. (2019). Extending the role of headquarters beyond the firm boundary:

entrepreneurial alliance innovation. Journal of Organization Design, 8(15), 1-35.

hhtps://doi.org/10.1186/s41469-019-0054-9

Killing, J. P. (1983). Strategies for Joint Venture Success (1st ed). Praeger: New York.

ISBN:978-0203077757.

Klijn, E., Olie, R., Reuer, J. J., Lumineau, F. (2021). A configurational analysis of joint venture governance mechanisms: The value of contractual agreements, boards of directors, and relational governance. 1-42.

Klijn, E., Reuer, JJ.,. Van den Bosch, F.A., & Volberda, H.W. (2013). Performance implications of IJV Boards: A contingency perspective. Journal of Management Studies, 50(7), 1245-1266.

Kogut, B. (1988). A study of the life cycle of joint ventures. Management International Review, 28, 169-186.

Krause, R., & Bruton, G. (2014). Agency and monitoring clarity on venture boards of directors.

Academy of Management Review, 39(1). 111-114.

49 Kumar S., & Seth, A. (1998). The design of coordination and control mechanisms for management joint venture-parent relationships. Strategic Management Journal, 19(6), 579-599.

Lee, Y., Cavusgil, T. (2006). Enhancing alliance performance: The effects of contractual-based versus relational-based governance. Journal of Business Research, 59. 896-905.

Linck, J. S., Netter, J. M., & Yang, T. (2008). The determinants of board structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 87(2), 308-328.

Lipton, M., & Lorsch, J.W. 1992. A modest proposal for improved corporate governance. The Business Lawyer, 48(1), 59-77.

Liu, Y., & Ravichandran, T. (2011). A dedicated alliance function, information technology, and the integration of alliance experience. ICIS 2011 Proceedings, 2

Lumineau, F. (2014). Revisiting the interplay between contractual and relational governance:

A qualitative and meta-analytic investigation. Journal of Operations Management, 33-34(1), 15-42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jom.2014.09.009

Lumineau, F., Frechet, M., Puthod, D. (2011). An organizational learning perspective on the contracting process. Strategic Organization, 9(1), 8-32.

Luo, Y., Nyaw, M., Gong, Y., Shenkar, O. (2007). Do multiple partners help or hinder international joint venture performance? The mediating roles of contract completeness and partner cooperation. Strategic Management Journal, 28, 1021-1034.

https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.626

Luo, Y. (2002). Contract, cooperation, and performance in international joint ventures.

Strategic Management Journal, 23(10), 903-919.

Luo, Y. (2005). Transactional characteristics, institutional environment and joint venture contracts. Journal of International Business Studies, 36(2), 209-230.

Lyons, B., Mehta, J. (1997). Contracts, opportunism and trust: self-interest and social orientation. Cambridge Journal of Economics 21(2), 239-257.

https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.cje.a013668

Markham, W. T., Bonjean C. M., Corder, J. (1984). Measuring organizational control: the reliability and validity of the control graph approach. Human Relations, 37(4), 263-294.

Mayer, K. J., Argyres, N. S. (2004). Learning to contract: Evidence from the personal computer industry. Organization Science 15(4), 394-410.

Mellewigt, T., Madhok, A., & Weibel, A. (2007). Trust and formal contracts in interorganizational relationships – substitutes and complements. Managerial & Decision Economics, 28(8), 833-847. https://doi.org/10.1002/mde.1321

Misangyi, V .F. & Acharya, A. G. (2014). Substitutes or complements? A configurational examination of corporate governance mechanisms. Academy of Management Journal, 57(6), 1681-1705.

50 Mitchell, W. (1999). Alliances: Achieving long-term value and short-term goals. Mastering Strategy Series. Financial Times: London.

Mintzberg, H. (1979), The Structuring of organizations: A synthesis of the research. Prentice-Hall, ISBN:0138552703

Mjoen, H., Tallman, S. (1997). Control and performance in international joint ventures.

Organization Science, 8(3). 257-274.

Mohr, A. T., & Puck, J. F. (2005). Managing functional diversity to improve the performance of international Joint Ventures. Long Range Planning, 33(2), 163-182.

http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.1016/j.lrp.2005.02.004

Niesten, E., & Jolink, A. (2015) The impact of alliance management capabilities on alliance attributes and performance: A literature review. International Journal of Management Reviews, 17(1), 69–100. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijmr.12037

Parkhe, A. (1993). Strategic alliance structuring: a game theoretic and transaction cost examination of interfirm cooperation. Academy of Management Journal, 36(4), 794–829.

Pfeffer, J. (1972). Size and composition of corporate boards of directors: The organization and its environment. Administrative Science Quarterly, 218-228. https://doi.org/12393956

Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2012). Sources of method bias in social science research and recommendations on how to control it. Annual Review of Psychology, 63(1), 539-569.

Poppo. L., & Zenger, T. (2002). Do formal contracts and relational governance function as substitutes or complements? Strategic Management Journal, 23(1), 707-725.

Poppo, L., Zhou, K.Z., Zenger, T. R. (2008). Examining the conditional limits of relational governance: specialized assets, performance ambiguity, and long-standing ties. Journal of Management Study, 45(7), 1195–1216. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2008.00779.x Raheja, C. G. (2005). Determinants of board size and composition: A theory of corporate boards. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 283-306.

Ravasi, D., & Zattoni, T. (2006). Exploring the political side of board involvement in strategy:

A study of mixed-ownership institutions. Journal of Management Studies, 43(8), 1671-1702.

Reuer, J. J., Klijn, E., & Lioukas, C. S. (2014). Board involvement in international joint ventures. Strategic Management Journal, 35(11), 1626-1644.

Ryall, M. D., & Sampson, R. C., (2009). Formal contracts in the presence of relational enforcement mechanisms: Evidence from technology development projects. Management Science 55(6), 206-216.

Russo, A., & Vurro, C. (2019). Alliance management knowledge and alliance performance:

unveiling the moderating role of the dedicating alliance function. Industrial and Corporate Change, 28(4), 725-752. https://doi.org/10.1093/ICC/DTY037

Rothaermel, F. T., & Deeds, D. L. 2006. Alliance type, alliance experience and alliance management capability in high-technology ventures. Journal of Business Venturing, 21, 429-460. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2005.02.006

51 Schildt, H. A., Maula, M. V. J., & Keil, T. (2005). Explorative and exploitative learning from external corporate ventures. Entrepreneurship: Theory & Practice, 29(4), 493-515.

https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2005.00085.x

Schilke, O. & Goerzen, A. (2010) Alliance management capability: An investigation of the construct and its measurement. Journal of Management 36, 1192–1219.

https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206310362102

Schreiner, M., Kale, P., & Corsten, D. (2009) What really is alliance management capability and how does it impact alliance outcomes and success? Strategic Management Journal, 30, 1395–1419. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.790

Vandaele, D., Rangarajan, D., Gemmel, P., & Lievens, A. (2007). How to govern business services exchanges: Contractual and relational issues. International Journal of Management Reviews, 9(3), 237-258. https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2370.2007.00212.x

Vanneste, B.S., Punaram, P. (2010). Repeated interactions and contractual detail: identifying the learning effect. Organization Science, 21(1), 186-201.

Wang, L., Song, M., Zhang, M., Wang, L. (2021). How does contract completeness affect tacit knowledge acquisition? Journal of Knowledge Management, 25(5), 989-1005.

Williamson, O. E. (1985). The economic institutions of capitalism. Free Press, ISBN:978-0029348208

Whitelock, J. & Rees, M. (1993). Trends in mergers and acquisitions and Joint Ventures in the Single European Market. European Business Review, 93(4).

https://doi.org/10.1108/EUM0000000001919

Yermack, D. (1996). Higher market valuation of companies with a small board of directors.

Journal of Financial Economics, 40(2). 185-211.

Zajac, E. J. (1998). Commentary on “Alliances and networks” by R. Gulati. Strategic Management Journal, Special Issue 9(4), 319-32. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199804)19:4<293::AID-SMJ982>3.0.CO;2-M

Zollo, M. (2009). Superstitious learning with rare strategic decisions: theory and evidence from corporate acquisitions. Organization Science, 20(5), 894–908.

52

GERELATEERDE DOCUMENTEN